Corporate Banner
Satellite Banner
Scientific Community
Become a Member | Sign in
Home>News>This Article

Is There a Role for Vitamins in Cancer Prevention?

Published: Monday, August 12, 2013
Last Updated: Monday, August 12, 2013
Bookmark and Share
According to recent national surveys, approximately 40 percent of U.S. adults take multivitamins/multiminerals.

People take dietary supplements for multiple reasons: to prevent diseases, manage diseases, extend life, and promote general health. Some take supplements with the goal of preventing cancer occurrence or recurrence and of prolonging life after a cancer diagnosis.

The question that people want answered is: Do these supplements work?

Historically, there has always been a quest to find an elixir or “magic bullet” that will stave off disease and promote long life, and in times when nutrient deficiencies were common, vitamin supplementation may have been a valuable public health strategy. However, now that the U.S. food supply is largely fortified with folic acid, iodine, niacin, and vitamin D, this rationale may be less appropriate.

If some of these supplements are effective, which ones are they? What is the appropriate/ necessary dose? And how long must you  take the vitamin to see an effect?

Unfortunately, for vitamin/mineral proponents, if we look at data from human studies, we see limited support for the use of vitamins/minerals to broadly prevent cancer.

No Clear Benefit, Some Evidence of Harm

Numerous observational studies (studies in which the study participants were not asked to change their behavior) and clinical trials have shown limited or no benefits from supplemental vitamins and minerals.

In the past, these results provided sufficient evidence to say that at least the supplements were not harmful, even if they provided no specific benefit. However, more recent reports have suggested that some forms of vitamins and minerals may be harmful.

Investigators from the Iowa Women’s Health Study, an observational study of more than 38,000 older women, found that several commonly used vitamin and mineral supplements (multivitamins, vitamin B6, folic acid, iron, magnesium, zinc, and copper) were associated with increased total mortality. This was surprising, as there was little prior evidence suggesting harm.

Our group recently reported on data from the observational Life After Cancer Epidemiology (LACE) study, which suggested that among women with breast cancer who were primarily recruited at Kaiser-Permanente of Northern California, the use of dietary supplements with carotenoids may increase overall mortality, whereas the use of other forms of antioxidants (vitamin C, vitamin E) may be associated with a protective effect (though this may not be real and could be explained by the “healthy user” bias). The most important implication of these results was that different types of antioxidant supplements may have effects.

None of these results stands on its own; all of them need to be replicated in other studies. We must interpret study results and infer causation in light of other data. If, for example, we look at the literature on the use of carotenoid supplements for cancer prevention, we see that there are other trials that have shown harm and that few, if any, have shown any benefit related to cancer prevention.

No Magic Bullet

Clinical trials are our gold standard for testing agents of interest. The SELECT trial was a randomized controlled trial of vitamin E and selenium for prostate cancer prevention among healthy men. While neither supplement prevented prostate cancer, the results suggested that vitamin E increased the risk of prostate cancer.

The most recent vitamin trial to receive attention was the Physicians’ Health Study II, a randomized controlled trial that included more than 14,000 male U.S. physicians 50 years or older. The men were randomized to take either a daily multivitamin or a placebo. The study found that for men taking the multivitamin, there was an 8 percent reduction in total cancer incidence, excluding nonmelanoma skin cancer.

However, there was no difference in overall deaths between the two groups. These results raise the question: From the public health perspective, if multivitamin use decreased cancer incidence but did not decrease overall deaths, what would be the benefit to encourage men to take multivitamins?

These studies are just a few among the many observational and clinical trials that have failed to reveal the magic bullet that will prevent cancer and extend life among the general population. The studies also show the potential for harm with these agents. Additional ongoing studies of supplemental vitamin D, fish oils, and other agents  will reveal whether they would be beneficial on the population level.

Focus on Diet, Exercise, Not Supplements

A current approach to cancer prevention trials is to ask whether specific populations may benefit from dietary supplements. For example, vitamin D may be of benefit to individuals with low levels of vitamin D due to darker skin pigmentation or low sun exposure. From a global perspective, individuals with environmental exposures, such as arsenic in groundwater wells in Bangladesh, may benefit from folic acid supplementation to decrease the carcinogenic effects of arsenic. But such supplementation is beneficial to targeted populations—not broadly applicable to all people.

Where does that leave us? Both the American Cancer Society (ACS) and the American Institute for Cancer Research (AICR) clearly state in their clinical guidelines that current evidence does not support the use of any dietary supplements for primary cancer prevention or for the prevention of cancer recurrence.

What should we do? Until we have evidence to suggest otherwise, we can follow the other cancer prevention recommendations from both the ACS and AICR. 1) Eat a diet rich in vegetables and fruits, high in whole grains, and low in processed and energy-dense foods; if your diet is nutritionally balanced, you probably don’t need a multivitamin. 2) Be physically active every day. 3) Maintain a lean body.

If you do feel compelled to take dietary supplements, understand what  you are taking, why you think it may be beneficial, and what risks may be involved. Finally, understand that a supplement should never be viewed as a sole means of cancer prevention.

Further Information
Access to this exclusive content is for Technology Networks Premium members only.

Join Technology Networks Premium for free access to:

  • Exclusive articles
  • Presentations from international conferences
  • Over 2,600+ scientific posters on ePosters
  • More than 3,800+ scientific videos on LabTube
  • 35 community eNewsletters

Sign In

Forgotten your details? Click Here
If you are not a member you can join here

*Please note: By logging into you agree to accept the use of cookies. To find out more about the cookies we use and how to delete them, see our privacy policy.

Related Content

New Link Between Obesity and Diabetes Found
Targeting a single enzyme that raises both sugar and insulin levels in the obese could prevent and treat diabetes.
Monday, November 25, 2013
Study Reveals Genes That Drive Brain Cancer
About 15 percent of glioblastoma patients could receive personalized treatment with drugs currently used in other cancers.
Tuesday, August 06, 2013
Key Molecular Pathways Leading to Alzheimer’s Identified
Research approach highlights potential therapeutic targets.
Thursday, July 25, 2013
New Genetic Cause of Pulmonary Hypertension Identified
Study finds druggable target for rare fatal lung disease.
Thursday, July 25, 2013
Mutation Linked to Congenital Urinary Tract Defects
Findings point to new diagnostic category.
Thursday, July 18, 2013
Mouse Study Suggests Lead May Trigger Schizophrenia
Behavioral and MRI study in mice points to a synergistic relationship between lead exposure and schizophrenia gene.
Monday, June 10, 2013
Many Birth Defects in Heart Caused by Spontaneous Mutations
A study has found that at least 10 percent of cases stem from genetic mutations that occur spontaneously early in development.
Thursday, May 30, 2013
Common Childhood Asthma Not Rooted in Allergens, Inflammation
Discovery of origins of a unique form of asthma may lead to a precision medicine approach to treatment.
Friday, May 24, 2013
Looking for the Telltale Gene
A new genetic test allows parents to peer into their unborn children's medical future.
Friday, May 24, 2013
Hundreds of Alterations and Potential Drug Targets to Starve Tumors Identified
A massive study analyzing gene expression data from 22 tumor types has identified multiple metabolic expression changes associated with cancer.
Monday, April 22, 2013
New Gene Associated with Almost Doubled Alzheimer’s Risk in African-Americans
ABCA7, a minor gene variant in whites, is major player in African-Americans.
Wednesday, April 10, 2013
Schizophrenia Gene Networks Found, and a Link to Autism
Although schizophrenia is highly genetic in origin, the genes involved in the disorder have been difficult to identify.
Thursday, November 15, 2012
New de novo Genetic Mutations in Schizophrenia Identified
Columbia University Medical Center (CUMC) researchers have identified dozens of new spontaneous genetic mutations that play a significant role in the development of schizophrenia, adding to the growing list of genetic variants that can contribute to the disease.
Thursday, October 04, 2012
New de novo Genetic Mutations in Schizophrenia Identified
Columbia University Medical Center (CUMC) researchers have identified dozens of new spontaneous genetic mutations that play a significant role in the development of schizophrenia, adding to the growing list of genetic variants that can contribute to the disease.
Thursday, October 04, 2012
Tom Maniatis: A Deep Sense that Science Must Be Shared
History books are filled with the technical advances that made genetic engineering possible, from the discovery of enzymes that cut and paste DNA to the development of techniques for reading the sequence of genes.
Tuesday, September 11, 2012
Scientific News
New Gene Therapy for Vision Loss From a Mitochondrial Disease
NIH-funded study shows success in targeting mitochondrial DNA in mice.
Five New Genetic Variants Linked to Brain Cancer Identified
The biggest ever study of DNA from people with glioma – the most common form of brain cancer – has discovered five new genetic variants associated with the disease.
Predictive Model for Breast Cancer Progression
Biomedical engineers have demonstrated a proof-of-principle technique that could give women and their oncologists more personalized information to help them choose options for treating breast cancer.
Fatty Liver Disease and Scarring Have Strong Genetic Component
Researchers say that hepatic fibrosis, which involves scarring of the liver that can result in dysfunction and, in severe cases, cirrhosis and cancer, may be as much a consequence of genetics as environmental factors.
Specific Variations in RNA Splicing Linked to Breast Cancer
Researchers have identified cellular changes that may play a role in converting normal breast cells into tumors. Targeting these changes could potentially lead to therapies for some forms of breast cancer.
Finding Links and Missing Genes
A catalogue of large-scale genetic changes around the world.
Scientists Test New Gene Therapy for Vision Loss from a Mitochondrial Disease
NIH-funded study shows success in targeting mitochondrial DNA in mice.
Gene Expression: A Snapshot of Stem Cell Development
New genes found that regulate development of stem cells.
Assessing Cancer Patient Survival and Drug Sensitivity
RNA editing events another way to investigate biomarkers and therapy targets.
A Natural History of Neurons
Diverse mutations reveal lineage of brain cells.
Skyscraper Banner

Skyscraper Banner
Go to LabTube
Go to eposters
Access to the latest scientific news
Exclusive articles
Upload and share your posters on ePosters
Latest presentations and webinars
View a library of 1,800+ scientific and medical posters
2,600+ scientific and medical posters
A library of 2,500+ scientific videos on LabTube
3,800+ scientific videos