Corporate Banner
Satellite Banner
Scientific Community
Become a Member | Sign in
Home>News>This Article

NMR Advance Brings Proteins into the Open

Published: Wednesday, June 26, 2013
Last Updated: Wednesday, June 26, 2013
Bookmark and Share
A key protein interaction had eluded scientists’ observation until a team of researchers cracked the case by combining data from four different techniques of NMR.

When working a cold case, smart investigators try something new. By taking a novel approach to nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy — a blending of four techniques — scientists have been able to resolve a key interaction between two proteins that could never be observed before. They report on their findings the week of June 24, 2013, in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS).

The interaction, which the team first described, is nearly universal across all of life. A protein machine called a chaperone takes hold of a disordered smaller protein to help it find its proper folded conformation. In this case, the team set up test-tube experiments where they hoped to watch the capsule-shaped bacterial chaperone GroEL capture a disordered amyloid β (Aβ) protein, a molecule that in humans is central in Alzheimer’s disease.

The two proteins are well studied, but the motions they go through when they first meet — when the open GroEL capsule captures its target — have been invisible to scientists. Electron microscopy and X-ray crystallography are only good for taking snapshots of easily frozen moments in time. NMR is capable of sensing the interactions and kinetics of protein handshakes as they occur, but in some cases any single technique can provide only hints and whispers of what’s going on.

Brown University biologist Nicolas Fawzi, who was a postdoctoral researcher in the group of Marius Clore at the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK) within the National Institutes of Health (NIH), worked with co-authors and NIDDK researchers David Libich, Jinfa Yang and Marius Clore to piece together the story of the proteins by combining four different NMR techniques. They figured out what each one could tell them about the interaction and built the case presented in PNAS.

“None of the four techniques alone gave us sufficient information,” said Fawzi, assistant professor of medical science in Brown’s Department of Molecular Pharmacology, Physiology, and Biotechnology. “Only by using them all together would we be able to figure out the structure and motions of Aβ when it was bound to GroEL. By having four indirect measurements together, that was able to give us a complete picture.”

The researchers acted like a team of detectives working on a case in which no single witness saw everything. Instead they found three witnesses, each with something different to contribute, and then one more that could corroborate some of what the others revealed and rule out other possibilities. The NMR techniques they used were lifetime line broadening, Carr-Purcell-Meinboom-Gill (CPMG) relaxation dispersion spectroscopy, and exchange-induced chemical shifts.

“The fourth technique we employed was Dark-state Exchange Saturation Transfer (DEST) spectroscopy, which we had developed in my lab at the NIH in 2011,” said Clore, also the paper’s corresponding author. “We were able to more effectively conduct our research by using that tool to corroborate and extend the information afforded by the other three measurements.”

Bouncing with the chaperone

The mystery debated among molecular biologists was what the GroEL chaperone requires of its captives at the moment they engage. Does it force them into a particular conformation? Does it hold on tightly while it closes its capsule lid around the smaller protein, or does the captive stay in motion at all?

What the team observed is that the GroEL is a permissive captor. It bound Aβ at just two “hydrophobic” sites, leaving the smaller protein to otherwise dangle in a variety of conformations. It also didn’t keep it bound the entire time, letting it instead detach and re-bind. Essentially Aβ would bounce off and on within GroEL’s binding cavity.

“By using these four techniques together we were able to extract information about the structure of the protein while it binds as well as how fast it comes on and off and what it’s doing at each position,” Fawzi said. “Instead of forming more particular structure upon binding it appears to retain great conformational heterogeneity.”

The lifetime line broadening technique, for example, told them that the Aβ was interacting with something big (GroEL), while the CPMG and chemical shift observations combined to show the length of time Aβ spent on GroEL before unbinding, as well as the structural details of Aβ when it was bound to GroEL. DEST provided information that could confirm much of the story of the other techniques.

Fawzi said GroEL’s laid-back approach could be a matter of being able to bind many different proteins in disordered conformations, but also of saving energy. Forcing proteins into a specific conformation just to make and sustain the initial capture would require more energy than it’s worth.

Eventually, in moments after those the team resolved in this study, GroEL closes its lid and encapsulates its target proteins fully, Fawzi said. That’s when it invests in forcing them to fold the right way.

For molecular and structural biologists, the newly proven blend of NMR techniques could open a number of other cold cases of elusive interactions.

“We can now look at how these big machines can do their job while they are working,” Fawzi said. “This is not just limited to this GroEL machine.”

The research was supported by NIDDK Intramural Research Program and supplemented by the NIH Intramural AIDS Targeted Antiviral Program of the NIH Director.

Further Information
Access to this exclusive content is for Technology Networks Premium members only.

Join Technology Networks Premium for free access to:

  • Exclusive articles
  • Presentations from international conferences
  • Over 2,800+ scientific posters on ePosters
  • More than 4,000+ scientific videos on LabTube
  • 35 community eNewsletters

Sign In

Forgotten your details? Click Here
If you are not a member you can join here

*Please note: By logging into you agree to accept the use of cookies. To find out more about the cookies we use and how to delete them, see our privacy policy.

Related Content

Proteins with ALS, Cancer Role Do Not Assume a Regular Shape
Our cells contain proteins, essential to functions like protein creation and DNA repair but also involved in forms of ALS and cancer, that never take a characteristic shape, a new study shows.
Monday, October 12, 2015
Study Proposes New Ovarian Cancer Targets
Researchers from Brown University propose that TAFs may be important suspects in the progression of ovarian cancer.
Friday, March 14, 2014
Newly Found CLAMP Protein Regulates Genes
Protein turns out to be the missing link that allows a key regulatory complex to find and operate on the lone X chromosome of male fruit flies.
Tuesday, July 23, 2013
Magnet Sends Lab Capacity ‘Through the Roof’ at Laboratories for Molecular Medicine
As a crane lowered a powerful 3.8-ton magnet through the roof, Brown began work on deploying a powerful new tool for molecular biology research.
Tuesday, February 05, 2013
Brown Researchers Create Novel Technique to Sequence Human Genome
Physicists report in the journal Nanotechnology the first experiment to move a DNA chain through a nanopore using magnets.
Thursday, April 30, 2009
Scientific News
NIH Supports New Studies to Find Alzheimer’s Biomarkers in Down Syndrome
Initiative will track dementia onset, progress in Down syndrome volunteers.
Dementia Linked to Deficient DNA Repair
Mutant forms of breast cancer factor 1 (BRCA1) are associated with breast and ovarian cancers but according to new findings, in the brain the normal BRCA1 gene product may also be linked to Alzheimer’s disease.
How Cells ‘Climb’ to Build Fruit Fly Tracheas
Mipp1 protein helps cells sprout “fingers” for gripping.
A Cellular Symphony Responsible for Autoimmune Disease
Broad Institute researchers have used a novel approach to increase our understanding of the immune system as a whole.
Non-Disease Proteins Kill Brain Cells
Scientists at the forefront of cutting-edge research into neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s have shown that the mere presence of protein aggregates may be as important as their form and identity in inducing cell death in brain tissue.
Closing the Loop on an HIV Escape Mechanism
Research team finds that protein motions regulate virus infectivity.
New Class of RNA Tumor Suppressors Identified
Two short, “housekeeping” RNA molecules block cancer growth by binding to an important cancer-associated protein called KRAS. More than a quarter of all human cancers are missing these RNAs.
Gut Microbes Signal to the Brain When They're Full
Don't have room for dessert? The bacteria in your gut may be telling you something.
Turning up the Tap on Microbes Leads to Better Protein Patenting
Mining millions of proteins could become faster and easier with a new technique that may also transform the enzyme-catalyst industry, according to University of California, Davis, researchers.
Exploring the Causes of Cancer
Queen's research to understand the regulation of a cell surface protein involved in cancer.
Scroll Up
Scroll Down
Skyscraper Banner

SELECTBIO Market Reports
Go to LabTube
Go to eposters
Access to the latest scientific news
Exclusive articles
Upload and share your posters on ePosters
Latest presentations and webinars
View a library of 1,800+ scientific and medical posters
2,800+ scientific and medical posters
A library of 2,500+ scientific videos on LabTube
4,000+ scientific videos