Satellite Banner
Technology
Networks
Scientific Communities
 
Become a Member | Sign in
Home>News>This Article
  News
Return

Genetically Modified Food Labeling Through the Lens of Public Health

Published: Tuesday, November 06, 2012
Last Updated: Tuesday, November 06, 2012
Bookmark and Share
A UCSF scientist and a physician weigh in on the heated debate over the safety of GMOs.

As Californians prepare to vote on Proposition 37, which would require labeling of food that’s been genetically modified, debate continues on the health implications of eating such foods.

Genetically modified organisms, or GMOs, generally refer to crop plants in which a gene has been introduced from another plant in a technique called gene-splicing to get the plant to express desirable traits, such as herbicide tolerance or insect resistance. Traditionally, getting plants to express desirable traits was done through plant breeding, but that can be time-consuming and produce results that aren’t always accurate.

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved the first GMO crops in 1994, and as of 2011, about 88 percent of all corn and 94 percent of all soybeans produced in the country were grown from genetically engineered seeds, according to the U.S. Department of Agriculture. Other common genetically engineered crops include alfalfa, canola, cotton, papaya, zucchini and sugar beets, which are used to make sugar.

California’s Proposition 37 would require the labeling of raw or processed foods produced with the help of genetic engineering, and it would prohibit those foods from being marketed as “natural,” with some exemptions, including restaurant food, pet food, alcohol and meat from animals that ate GMO plants.

Supporters of Proposition 37 pose it as a consumer “right to know” issue, while opponents say the labeling would be alarmist because there’s no conclusive evidence of health risks associated with GMO foods.

In a heated campaign funded by millions of dollars from agribusiness, grocery retailers and environmental groups — more than $46 million on the No side and nearly $9 million on the Yes side — there’s only one thing both sides can agree on: The science on GMO health effects is inconclusive.

“It’s really a value-laden decision. How do you act in the face of scientific uncertainty?” said Patrice Sutton, MPH, a researcher with UCSF’s Program on Reproductive Health and the Environment (PRHE), which works through research, clinical care and public policy to prevent exposures of harmful chemicals in the environment. “From a public health perspective, there’s a general principle that you would have people be able to decide for themselves.”

Robert Gould, MD, an associate adjunct professor in the UCSF Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences and PRHE’s director of health professional outreach, was a delegate to the California Medical Association’s (CMA) annual meeting last month, at which they renewed a 2002 policy supporting the labeling of GMO foods. The American Public Health Association, the nation’s largest organization of public health professionals, also endorses GMO labeling.

“As much as patients have a right to know what is in their food, physicians also need to know what their patients are eating,” said Gould, also president of the San Francisco Bay Area chapter of Physicians for Social Responsibility, which has endorsed GMO labeling. “So if you’re following your patient and something comes up and there’s a question about food allergenicity or side effects from substances — absent labeling, it is very difficult to track potential health impacts.”

CMA’s 10-year-old policy differs from that of the American Medical Association, which does not support labeling but has called for mandatory pre-market safety testing for all GMO foods. Currently all pre-market testing is voluntary.

No Confirmed Health Risk

The World Health Organization (WHO) — which issued a 2005 report touting the benefits of GMOs while urging further safety assessments — outlines three main health concerns with GMO food:

•    Allegenicity — When genes are transferred from one plant into another, there is potential to also transfer allergens. GMO crops do undergo extensive testing for allergenic effects, according to the WHO.

•    Gene Transfer — GMO foods potentially could introduce genetic material to cells of the body that could have adverse health effects, such as antibiotic resistance. The WHO says the probability of such a transfer is low, and it encourages the use of technology without antibiotic resistance genes.

•    Outcrossing — When GMO crops are located near conventional crops or crop species in the wild, there’s a potential for seeds to mix by wind or insect pollination, having an effect on food safety and security. For example, the WHO cited an instance when traces of a maize approved only for animal feed use appeared in maize products for human consumption.

The European Union has taken the lead in researching the biosafety of GMOs, and so far, studies have shown no confirmed risk to humans who eat GMOs. However, more than 40 countries already label GMO foods, including those in the European Union, as well as India and China.

The American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS), the nation’s largest general scientific society, pointed to the EU studies when its board issued a statement last month opposing GMO labeling measures. The statement pointed to “misconceptions” that such foods are somehow unnatural and untested, and argued that the biotechnology used for GMOs has been beneficial to humans “much as immunizations protect people from disease.”

The AAAS noted that biotechnology has allowed growers to produce food that’s even more nutritious, such as lycopene-rich Rio Star grapefruit. Another crop, called Golden Rice, was genetically engineered to have beta-carotene, which the body converts into vitamin A, and is aimed toward populations in Asia to combat vitamin deficiencies.

“The FDA does not require labeling of a food based on the specific genetic modification procedure used in the development of its input crops. Legally mandating such a label can only serve to mislead and falsely alarm consumers,” the AAAS statement said.

A controversial French study recently reported that rats that ate genetically modified corn sprayed with the weed killer Roundup were more likely to develop tumors, organ damage and die early. The study, however, has been heavily criticized by many scientists for its use of rats that are known for their propensity to develop tumors, and for producing inconsistent findings showing that some rat groups that ate more GMO corn didn’t get as sick as those who ate less.

Kathy Fairbanks, spokeswoman for the No on 37 Coalition, noted in a statement that “after just a cursory review, unbiased scientists have called into question the study’s controls, its data and its findings. Additional problems will likely be found as they have time to comb through it more carefully.”

A number of scientists have endorsed the No on 37 campaign, including UCSF Chancellor Emeritus J. Michael Bishop, who won the 1989 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine for his research on the role of genes in cancer.

Sutton and Gould agree that there hasn’t been any indication that GMOs are harmful, but they say longer-term studies are needed to examine possible chronic effects.

“Many people could rightly look at the existing science and see that it’s extremely weak,” Sutton said. “However, weak science does not prove safety, it just demonstrates that the public health impacts of GMOs are uncertain. It’s an overall public health principle that in the face of scientific uncertainty to expose everybody to something is a legitimate concern that should give us pause.”

Despite the risk of unnecessarily alarming the public about GMOs, Sutton and Gould believe there’s more value in patients being fully engaged in their own health.

“There’s empirical evidence that demonstrates that you can responsibly give people information about health risks. There’s also an ethical obligation as health providers to give people full information,” Sutton said.

Increase of Pesticide Use

Sutton and Gould also raised the issue of pesticide use, which has increased with the proliferation of GMO crops. For instance, Monsanto created Roundup Ready seeds to produce plants that can thrive even when the powerful Roundup weed killer is applied to the fields. Environmentalists and farmers have sounded alarms about the sprouting of so-called “superweeds” that have developed resistance to Roundup and its active ingredient glyphosate.

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency sets safety limits on pesticide residue on crops, and the FDA maintains a pesticide residue monitoring program.

PRHE has extensively reviewed the reproductive health impacts of pesticide exposure on pregnant women and children, finding that exposure to certain pesticides has been linked in human studies to childhood leukemia, neurological and other adverse developmental effects.

Sutton says the use of pesticides with GMO crops is a slippery slope. “You’re always chasing the next chemical because organisms develop resistance,” she said. “Really from a public health perspective, the direction is to have less toxic pesticides in the food supply.”


Further Information
Access to this exclusive content is for Technology Networks Premium members only.

Join Technology Networks Premium for free access to:

  • Exclusive articles
  • Presentations from international conferences
  • Over 2,400+ scientific posters on ePosters
  • More Than 3,700+ scientific videos on LabTube
  • 35 community eNewsletters


Sign In



Forgotten your details? Click Here
If you are not a member you can join here

*Please note: By logging into TechnologyNetworks.com you agree to accept the use of cookies. To find out more about the cookies we use and how to delete them, see our privacy policy.

Related Content

Scientists Create CRISPR/Cas9 Knock-In Mutations in Human T Cells
In a project spearheaded by investigators at UC San Francisco, scientists have devised a new strategy to precisely modify human T cells using the genome-editing system known as CRISPR/Cas9.
Tuesday, July 28, 2015
Simple Technology Makes CRISPR Gene Editing Cheaper
University of California, Berkeley, researchers have discovered a much cheaper and easier way to target a hot new gene editing tool, CRISPR-Cas9, to cut or label DNA.
Friday, July 24, 2015
Printed "Smart Cap" Detects Spoiled Food
It might not be long before consumers can just hit “print” to create an electronic circuit or wireless sensor in the comfort of their homes.
Tuesday, July 21, 2015
Growing Spinal Disc Tissue
Scientists develop new method for growing spinal disc tissue in the lab for combating chronic back pain.
Friday, July 03, 2015
Delivering Drugs to the Right Place
Thomas Weimbs has developed a targeted drug delivery method that could potentially slow the progression of polycystic kidney disease.
Monday, June 29, 2015
The Deep Carbon Cycle
Over billions of years, the total carbon content of the outer part of the Earth—in its upper mantle, crust, oceans and atmospheres—has gradually increased, scientists report.
Tuesday, June 23, 2015
Designing New Pain Relief Drugs
Researchers have identified the molecular interactions that allow capsaicin to activate the body’s primary receptor for sensing heat and pain, paving the way for the design of more selective and effective drugs to relieve pain.
Thursday, June 11, 2015
Engineers Crack DNA Code of Autoimmune Disorders
Researchers have identified an unexpectedly general set of rules that determine which molecules can cause the immune system to become vulnerable to the autoimmune disorders lupus and psoriasis.
Wednesday, June 10, 2015
Genetic Markers for Detecting and Treating Ovarian Cancer
Custom bioinformatics algorithm identifies human mRNAs that distinguish ovarian cancer cells from normal cells and provide new therapeutic targets
Wednesday, May 27, 2015
Researchers Reverse Bacterial Resistance to Antibiotics
Evidence continues to surface that supports the premise that antibiotics which have been out of use could still be effective in treating drug-resistant bacteria.
Friday, May 08, 2015
Industry-Sponsored Academic Inventions Spur Increased Innovation
Analysis questions assumption that corporate support skews science toward inventions that are less useful than those funded by the government or non-profit organizations.
Monday, March 24, 2014
May the Cellular Force be With You
Like tiny construction workers, cells sculpt embryonic tissues and organs in 3D space.
Friday, December 13, 2013
Grant Supports Creation of Patient-Derived Stem Cell Lines
Researchers have received a two-year, $600,000 grant from the National Institute on Aging to develop and study patient-derived stem cell lines.
Thursday, December 12, 2013
Prostate Cancer Stem Cells are a Moving Target
Researchers have discovered how prostate cancer stem cells evolve as the disease progresses, a finding that could help point the way to more highly targeted therapies.
Friday, December 06, 2013
International Fruit Pest Targeted by Genomic Research
The spotted wing drosophila is itself being targeted, thanks to groundbreaking genome sequencing.
Friday, December 06, 2013
Scientific News
RNAi Screening Trends
Understand current trends and learn which application areas are expected to gain in popularity over the next few years.
Diagnostic Test Developed for Enterovirus D68
researchers at Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis have developed a diagnostic test to quickly detect enterovirus D68 (EV-D68), a respiratory virus that caused unusually severe illness in children last year.
How a Kernel Got Naked and Corn Became King
Ten thousand years ago, a golden grain got naked, brought people together and grew to become one of the top agricultural commodities on the planet.
Sweet Revenge Against Superbugs
A special type of synthetic sugar could be the latest weapon in the fight against superbugs.
New Material Opens Possibilities for Super-Long-Acting Pills
A pH-responsive polymer gel could create swallow able devices, including capsules for ultra-long drug delivery.
How To Keep Your Rice Arsenic-Free
Researchers at Queen’s University Belfast have made a breakthrough in discovering how to lower worrying levels of arsenic in rice that is eaten all over the world.
New Tool For Investigating RNA Gone Awry
A new technology – called “Sticky-flares” – developed by nanomedicine experts at Northwestern University offers the first real-time method to track and observe the dynamics of RNA distribution as it is transported inside living cells.
Computer Model Could Explain how Simple Molecules Took First Step Toward Life
Two Brookhaven researchers developed theoretical model to explain the origins of self-replicating molecules.
New Tech Enables Epigenomic Analysis with a Mere 100 Cells
A new technology that will dramatically enhance investigations of epigenomes, the machinery that turns on and off genes and a very prominent field of study in diseases such as stem cell differentiation, inflammation and cancer has been developed by researchers at Virginia Tech.
Access Denied: Leukemia Thwarted by Cutting Off Link to Environmental Support
A new study reveals a protein’s critical – and previously unknown -- role in the development and progression of acute myeloid leukemia (AML), a fast-growing and extremely difficult-to-treat blood cancer.
Scroll Up
Scroll Down
Skyscraper Banner

Skyscraper Banner
Go to LabTube
Go to eposters
 
Access to the latest scientific news
Exclusive articles
Upload and share your posters on ePosters
Latest presentations and webinars
View a library of 1,800+ scientific and medical posters
2,400+ scientific and medical posters
A library of 2,500+ scientific videos on LabTube
3,700+ scientific videos
Close
Premium CrownJOIN TECHNOLOGY NETWORKS PREMIUM FREE!