We've updated our Privacy Policy to make it clearer how we use your personal data.

We use cookies to provide you with a better experience. You can read our Cookie Policy here.

Advertisement
Determination of Parent and Substituted Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in High-Fat Salmon
News

Determination of Parent and Substituted Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in High-Fat Salmon

Determination of Parent and Substituted Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in High-Fat Salmon
News

Determination of Parent and Substituted Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in High-Fat Salmon

Read time:
 

Want a FREE PDF version of This News Story?

Complete the form below and we will email you a PDF version of "Determination of Parent and Substituted Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in High-Fat Salmon"

First Name*
Last Name*
Email Address*
Country*
Company Type*
Job Function*
Would you like to receive further email communication from Technology Networks?

Technology Networks Ltd. needs the contact information you provide to us to contact you about our products and services. You may unsubscribe from these communications at any time. For information on how to unsubscribe, as well as our privacy practices and commitment to protecting your privacy, check out our Privacy Policy

Abstract
A fast and easy modified QuEChERS (quick, easy, cheap, rugged and safe) extraction method has been developed and validated for determination of 33 parent and substituted polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in high-fat smoked salmon that greatly enhances analyte recovery compared to traditional QuEChERS procedures. Sample processing includes extraction of PAHs into a solution of ethyl acetate, acetone and isooctane followed by cleanup with dispersive SPE and analysis by GC-MS in SIM mode. Method performance was assessed in spike recovery experiments (500 μg/g wet weight) in three commercially available smoked salmon with 3-11% fat. Recoveries of some 2-, 3- and 5-ring PAHs were improved 50-200% over traditional methods, while average recovery across all PAHs was improved 67%. Method precision was good with replicate extractions typically yielding relative standard deviations <10%, and detection limits were in the low ng/g range. With this method, a single analyst could extract and clean up ≥60 samples for PAH analysis in an 8 h work day.

The article is published online in the Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry and is free to access.

Advertisement