We've updated our Privacy Policy to make it clearer how we use your personal data.

We use cookies to provide you with a better experience. You can read our Cookie Policy here.

Advertisement
Quantitative Mass Spectrometry Reveals the Dynamics of Factor Inhibiting HIF (FIH)-Catalysed Hydroxylation
News

Quantitative Mass Spectrometry Reveals the Dynamics of Factor Inhibiting HIF (FIH)-Catalysed Hydroxylation

Quantitative Mass Spectrometry Reveals the Dynamics of Factor Inhibiting HIF (FIH)-Catalysed Hydroxylation
News

Quantitative Mass Spectrometry Reveals the Dynamics of Factor Inhibiting HIF (FIH)-Catalysed Hydroxylation

Read time:
 

Want a FREE PDF version of This News Story?

Complete the form below and we will email you a PDF version of "Quantitative Mass Spectrometry Reveals the Dynamics of Factor Inhibiting HIF (FIH)-Catalysed Hydroxylation"

First Name*
Last Name*
Email Address*
Country*
Company Type*
Job Function*
Would you like to receive further email communication from Technology Networks?

Technology Networks Ltd. needs the contact information you provide to us to contact you about our products and services. You may unsubscribe from these communications at any time. For information on how to unsubscribe, as well as our privacy practices and commitment to protecting your privacy, check out our Privacy Policy

Abstract
The asparaginyl hydroxylase, factor inhibiting HIF (FIH) is central to the oxygen-sensing pathway that controls the activity of hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF). FIH also catalyses the hydroxylation of a large set of proteins that share a structural motif termed the ankyrin repeat domain (ARD). In vitro studies have defined kinetic properties of FIH with respect to different substrates and have suggested FIH binds more tightly to certain ARD proteins than HIF, and that ARD hydroxylation may have a lower Km for oxygen than HIF hydroxylation. However, regulation of asparaginyl hydroxylation on ARD substrates has not been systematically studied in cells. To address these questions, we employed isotopic labeling and mass spectrometry to monitor the accrual, inhibition and decay of hydroxylation under defined conditions. Under the conditions examined, hydroxylation was not reversed but increased as the protein aged. The extent of hydroxylation on ARD proteins was increased by addition of ascorbate, whilst iron and 2-oxoglutarate supplementation had no significant effect. Despite preferential binding of FIH to ARD substrates in vitro, when expressed as fusion proteins in cells, hydroxylation was found to be more complete on HIF polypeptides compared to sites within the ARD. Furthermore, comparative studies of hydroxylation in graded hypoxia revealed ARD hydroxylation was suppressed in a site-specific manner and was as sensitive as HIF to hypoxic inhibition. These findings suggest that asparaginyl hydroxylation of HIF-1 and ARD proteins is regulated by oxygen over a similar range, potentially tuning the HIF transcriptional response through competition between the two types of substrate.

The article is published online in the Journal of Biological Chemistry and is free to access.

Advertisement