The Impact of MRI on Genitourinary and Gastrointestinal Toxicity after Radiation Therapy
Poster Feb 21, 2017
Kyle Kilinski; Arash Naghavi, MD; Yazan Abuodeh, MD; Michelle Echevarria, MD2; Nainesh Parikh, MD; Kenneth Gage, MD, PhD; Kosj Yamoah, MD, PhD
MRI has several advantages relative to other imaging modalities in evaluating, diagnosing, and planning treatment for prostate cancer. However, it is rarely ordered for localized disease. While the diagnostic abilities have been studied, little has been done to associate clinical outcomes with prostate cancer patients who received MRI. The study evaluates the effect of pre-treatment MRI on genitourinary (GU) and gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity in prostate cancer patients who received definitive radiation treatment.
We retrospectively analyzed all prostate cancer patients who underwent definitive radiation treatment at our facility between January 01, 1999 and July 31, 2014. All patients who underwent MRI of the pelvis or prostate within 5 years prior to treatment were included in the MRI cohort. The American Urological Symptom Score (AUA) and Rectal Assessment Scale (RAS) were used to measure GU and GI toxicity, respectively. We compared the toxicity profile of patients in our MRI cohort to a comparable cohort of patients who did not receive pre-treatment MRI.
1085 patients (211 with MRI) were analyzed. Median follow-up was 30 months. Mean increase from baseline in AUA scores at 6 months was 3.58 for the MRI cohort and 5.04 for the comparison cohort (p = 0.017). RAS scores were not significantly different between the MRI and comparison cohorts at 6 months (mean increase: 0.62 vs. 0.77, p = 0.662). AUA scores returned to baseline after 6 months in the MRI cohort and after 12 months in the comparison cohort. RAS scores returned to baseline after 12 months in the MRI cohort but never returned to baseline in the comparison cohort. Biochemical failure rates were not significantly different between the MRI cohort and comparison cohort (86.3% vs. 91.1%, p = 0.083).
Characterizing GPCR Activation Using Automated Live Cell ImagingPoster
Here we describe a live cell imaging based approach to detect GPCR activation using the Lionheart™ FX Automated Live Cell Imager and Gen5™ Microplate Reader and Imager Software.READ MORE
Is Oxford Nanopore Technology Ready for Clinical Diagnostics?Poster
Our objective is to validate diagnostic services using Oxford Nanopore’s Minion in the first instance and to evaluate the cost and performance compared to existing sequencing technology in areas such as tumour DNA sequencing (and circulating tumour DNA), virology, microbiology, genetics and HLA-typing.READ MORE
Determination of the Fat Content Profile of different Chocolate Products using an Automated Workflow for the Generation of Fatty Acid Methyl Esters (FAME)Poster
The method allows for automated determination of total fat content and quantitative analysis of saturated and unsaturated cis- and trans- fatty acids of different chocolate products.READ MORE