The Forever‑Changing World of PFAS Testing
eBook
Published: April 21, 2026
Credit: iStock.
Global PFAS regulations are tightening across drinking water, environmental samples, food, consumer products, and human exposure pathways. Detection limits are dropping into low ng/L and ppt ranges, while compound lists continue to expand.
Laboratories face persistent challenges with contamination control, matrix complexity, method robustness, and throughput.
This eBook examines the full PFAS lifecycle, connecting regulatory drivers with real‑world analytical performance considerations to help laboratories design resilient, future‑ready testing strategies.
Download this eBook to discover:
- How global PFAS regulations are reshaping testing requirements
- Ways to manage ultra low detection limits and contamination risk
- Practical insights into targeted and non targeted PFAS analysis
The forever changing
world of PFAS testing
The PFAS eBook from SCIEX2 | sciex.com 3
The forever changing world of PFAS testing PFAS the global
headline maker:
regulations from
around the world
The PFAS lifecycle:
an overview
Industry
collaborations:
a customer
success story
Solutions
at every level
PFAS around the
world: regional focus
(MDM) and trends
On-demand:
customer
collaborations
Phenomenex:
your partner in
PFAS-testing
consumables
Addressing the
challenges of
PFAS testing
SCIEX OS software:
when software
compliments
hardware
After-sales,
service, and support:
for all your needs
Technical
materials for each
component of the
PFAS lifecycle
The PFAS lifecycle:
an overview
Craig M. Butt
SCIEX
Jianru Stahl-Zeng
SCIEX
These MCLs cover PFOA and PFOS
(4 ng/L or parts-per-trillion), and
PFHxS, PFNA and HFPO-DA (10 ng/L).
PFBS is also covered by a hazard
index approach in samples containing
PFAS mixtures. The final rule also
requires all public water systems to
complete initial monitoring by 2027
and, if exceedances are found, to
implement reduction solutions by
2029. In addition, several states have
established their MCLs or guidance
levels for PFAS in drinking water.
How do these drinking water regulations
in the United States impact the
PFAS lifecycle? In 2021, the US EPA
established its PFAS Strategic Roadmap,
which ran until 2024. A guiding principle
of this roadmap was the PFAS lifecycle
and understanding the source of PFAS
contamination by driving to the root
cause. As a result, EPA 1633A was
finalized for the analysis of PFAS in
wastewater, surface water, groundwater,
soil biosolids, sediment, landfill leachate,
and fish tissue. These matrices
are more complex and inherently
challenging, placing increasing
demand on instrument performance.
In January 2021, the European Union
began enforcing PFAS drinking water
levels as part of their Drinking Water
Directive. The limits are 100 ng/L for
the sum of 20 PFAS compounds and
500 ug/L for “total PFAS”. In October
2022, the European Commission
proposed a standard for surface and
groundwater for 24 PFAS compounds
at 4.4 ng/L (as PFOA equivalents). The
lower limits will require lower reporting
limits and presumably novel analytical
methods to meet these limits.
Consumer products have also
been subject to recent or proposed
regulations in the United States and
European Union. A wide PFAS ban has
been proposed in the European Union,
although the details have not been
finalized. In February 2025, France
approved banning the manufacture,
import and export of PFAS-containing
consumer products, including
cosmetics, textiles and footwear.
Similar bans have been passed in
several US states, including New York
and California. Some regulations also
cover food packaging. Personal care
products, such as cosmetics, may
accumulate in the body during dermal
absorption, or enter the wastewater
systems after wash-off. Similarly,
textiles may contribute to wastewater
PFAS regulations continue to accelerate
around the globe. Recent years have seen
regulations evolve beyond drinking water and
include other matrices in the PFAS lifecycle
such as food and consumer products.
contamination and may be a source to
landfills during disposal. In addition, the
PFAS used in our consumer products
may end up in our house dust, which can
be ingested by humans and our pets.
The need to protect human health and
the environment has necessitated a full
understanding of the PFAS lifecycle.
As such, regulations on so-called
“upstream” matrices such wastewater,
surface waters and consumer products
are expanding. Researchers will need
to adapt our current methods to study
these novel matrices, presumably
with lower and lower detection limits.
Innovation in our mass spectrometry
will be crucial to meet these demands.
Contents
01 The PFAS lifecycle
an overview
02 PFAS the global
headline maker
regulations from around the world
03 Industry
collaborations
a customer success story
04 Addressing
the challenges
of PFAS testing
05 Solutions
at every level
06 SCIEX OS
when software compliments hardware
07 PFAS around the world
regional trends
08 After-sales,
service, and support
for all your needs
09 On-demand
customer collaborations
10 Technical materials
for each component of the
PFAS lifecycle
11 Phenomenex
your partner in PFAS-testing
consumables
The PFAS lifecycle:
an overview4 | sciex.com 5
The forever changing world of PFAS testing PFAS the global
headline maker:
regulations from
around the world
The PFAS lifecycle:
an overview
Industry
collaborations:
a customer
success story
Solutions
at every level
PFAS around the
world: regional focus
(MDM) and trends
On-demand:
customer
collaborations
Phenomenex:
your partner in
PFAS-testing
consumables
Addressing the
challenges of
PFAS testing
SCIEX OS software:
when software
compliments
hardware
After-sales,
service, and support:
for all your needs
Technical
materials for each
component of the
PFAS lifecycle
PFAS – A global
headline maker
Every day, it seems like there’s a new
headline about Per- and polyfluoroalkyl
substances (PFAS) restrictions being
implemented somewhere. Stories
like “Forever Chemical used on
Jersey’s Potato crops” or “Are PFAS
in everything? What you need to
know about ‘forever chemicals’” grab
attention and raise concerns globally.
After all, most of us consume food and
water or use products that might have
been exposed to PFAS at some point.
PFAS isn’t a new issue; it dates back
to the 1940s when it revolutionized
non-stick, heat-resistant products.
From household items like furniture,
wall paint, and carpets to industrial
uses like electrical wire coatings,
firefighting foams, and cosmetics, PFAS
has been widely adopted. However,
unlike its initial promise, this chemical
group leaves a lasting impact on the
human body and the environment.
Numerous studies have highlighted
the toxicity of PFAS, classifying it as
carcinogenic and an endocrine disruptor.
The dangers of PFAS are welldocumented, prompting regulators
across various industries to impose
strict testing and reporting procedures.
These measures ensure water quality
is safe and PFAS levels are within
acceptable limits. Guidelines are also
issued for PFAS levels in the food chain,
and policies are being developed for
manufactured products and personal
care items like clothing and makeup.
A significant regulatory move came
in 2022 when the US Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) issued
drinking water health advisory levels
(HALs) for four PFAS compounds.
In response, companies like SCIEX,
Eurofins, and Phenomenex developed
detailed methods to detect these
compounds at extremely low levels.
This advisory underscores the
seriousness with which regulators are
addressing PFAS contamination.
Regulatory efforts aren’t limited to
the United States. Around the world,
national standard agencies have been
rigorously governing PFAS in drinking
water, raw waters, and wastewaters
for years. Their focus has now
expanded to include food, produce, and
manufacturing processes. The following
map highlights some of the regulations
being implemented globally to manage
and control PFAS in various regions.
companies are exploring new materials
and technologies that can provide the
same benefits without the harmful
environmental and health impacts.
Public pressure and advocacy are
also playing a crucial role in pushing
for stricter regulations and more
transparency from manufacturers.
In the meantime, individuals can take
steps to reduce their exposure to PFAS
by being mindful of the products they
use and the food they consume. Opting
for PFAS-free products, filtering drinking
water, and staying informed about local
An insight into the various bodies around the
world driving policy, guidelines and regulation.
regulations and advisories can help US EPA regulations EU water framework directive
mitigate the risks associated with these
persistent chemicals. The collective
effort of regulators, industries, and
consumers will be essential in moving
towards a PFAS-free future.
EPA 537 (Micro LC + 6500+):
Analysis for PFAS using microflow
liquid chromatography
EPA 537.1 (4500): Analysis
of PFAS in drinking water
EPA 537 (5500): Quantitation
of PFAS in water samples using
LCMS large-volume injection
and solid phase extraction
EPA 533 (4500): Analysis of PFAS
at low ppt levels in drinking water
An ultra-high sensitivity analysis of PFAS
compounds in multiple water sources
Quantitation of PFAS in
food with parts per trillion
levels of sensitivity
EPA 533 (5500+): PFAS
analysis in drinking water at
low parts-per-trillion levels
p 1
Analysis of PFAS at low ppt levels in drinking water via EPA
method 533
Using the SCIEX Triple Quad 4500 system
Matthew Standland, Craig M. Butt, and Matthew Noestheden
SCIEX, USA
Per- and polyfluorinated alkyl substances (PFAS) are a group of
manmade chemicals that have been used for decades in a large
host of applications. A recent review focused on 1,400 unique
PFAS species1 although current OECD databases have upwards
of 4,500 unique PFAS compounds.2 The resilience of some
PFAS to degradation and their potential for biological harm have
spurred health and environmental concerns amongst regulatory
agencies. The CDC’s national biomonitoring program has found
evidence of widespread presence of certain PFAS residues in
human serum3. One possible route of human exposure is from
PFAS contaminated water.4
PFAS are known to enter the water supply and bioaccumulate in
watershed ecosystems. This can be a health issue for humans
who directly consume contaminated water. The US EPA
published the fifth unregulated contaminant monitoring rule
(UCMR5)5, which proposes maximum residue limits (MRL) for
PFAS residues in EPA method 533. Representative chemical
structures are shown in Figure 1.
This technical note presents data collected in accordance with
EPA method 533 requirements for the initial demonstration of
capability (IDC). Sample preparation was done using
Phenomenex Strata-X-AW Weak Anion solid-phase extraction
(SPE) and data acquisition was performed using the SCIEX
Triple Quad 4500 system coupled to an ExionLC AC system.
Key method features
• MRLs ≤ 3 ng/L reported for all analytes, meeting UCMR5
requirements for EPA method 533 compounds
• Sensitive and robust performance meets all EPA method 533
performance criteria
• SCIEX OS software simplifies data review and report
generation using custom calculations and flagging rules
• Specialized LC setup ensures low systemic contamination
Figure 1. Representative structural diversity among EPA method
533 analytes. Compounds can have either sulfonate (left) or
carboxylate head groups (right). Structure variability can also include
per-/polyfluorinated species, the presence or absence of ether
linkage(s) and alkyl chain length with or without branching.
p 1
For research use only. Not for use in diagnostics procedures.
Confidential - Company Proprietary
An ultra-high sensitivity analysis of PFAS compounds in
multiple water sources
Using the SCIEX 7500 System
Bertram Nieland1, Jack Steed2, Rens-Jan Jaspers3, Kay Hup3, Abdessamad Chahbouni3, Jianru Stahl-Zeng4
1SCIEX, The Netherlands; 2SCIEX, UK; 3Het Waterlaboratorium, 4SCIEX, Germany
In this method sub-parts per trillion (ppt) levels of detection for 26
PFAS compounds was achieved with LOD values of 0.2 ng/L in
diluent and calculated method detection limits in drinking,
ground, and surface water ranging between 0.06 ng/L and 1.12
ng/L.
PFAS compounds are ubiquitous in our environment due to
overuse and their lack of breakdown, ensuring that this will be a
challenge for decades to come.1 Therefore, it is imperative to
provide rigorous and sensitive analytical testing to regulate these
compounds and try to limit their possible effects on human
health.
In December 2020, the European Parliament and Council of the
European Union released a new directive that sets the limit of
PFAS in drinking water to 0.5 µg/L for all PFAS compounds
identified, and 0.1 µg/L for a subset of PFAS compounds that are
particularly concerning for humans. The difference between the
limits is dependent on a list of compounds stated within the
directive. The 0.1 µg/L limit applies to the compounds included in
this list, which contain a perfluoroalkyl moiety with 3 or more
carbons (i.e., –CnF2n–, n ≥ 3) or a perfluoroalkylether moiety
with 2 or more carbons (i.e., –CnF2nOCmF2m−, n and m ≥ 1).
The 0.5 µg/L limit applies to all PFAS compounds in total 2 This
method is suitable for drinking water, surface water and
groundwater. Testing of surface and ground water is important to
ensure that these water sources are not contaminated and that
drinking water sources are not affected.
Key features of PFAS analysis using the
SCIEX 7500 System
• Ultra-high levels of sensitivity with LOQ values between 0.2
ng/L and 2.0 ng/L. See Figures 1 and 2 which highlight the
sensitivity achieved.
• Calculated method detection limits between 0.06 ng/L and
1.12 ng/L in three different water matrices
• Twenty-six relevant PFAS compounds analyzed in LC-MS
grade, drinking, ground and surface water
• The mitigation of equipment which can cause PFAS
contamination to decrease blank contamination and
interference at the analyte retention time
Figure 1. Extracted ion chromatograms (XICs) of three PFAS compounds at their respective LOQs. From left to right: PFBS, PFHxA and PFOS –
all at 0.2 ng/L. The image above shows excellent sensitivity has been achieved with this method at low ng/L levels.
PFBS PFHxA PFOS
Xanthippe Theurillat1, Claudia Mujahid1, Bjorn Eriksen1, Ashley Griffin2, Andrew Savage2, Thierry Delatour1, Pascal Mottier1, Jack
Steed3, Michael Scherer4, Jianru Stahl-Zeng5
1Société des Produits Nestlé, Nestlé Research; 2Société des Produits Nestlé, Nestlé Quality Assurance Center, 3SCIEX, UK; 4SCIEX,
Switzerland; 5SCIEX, Germany
This technical note demonstrates a validated method for the
analysis of 57 per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS)
compounds in a diverse range of food matrices. Using the SCIEX
7500 system and a simplified extrac�on method, the limit of
quan�ta�on (LOQ) levels met the Commission Regula�on EU
2022/2388 for the 4 regulated PFAS compounds, including:
PFOS, PFOA, PFNA and PFHxS. Specifically, LOQs were as low as
0.01 µg/kg for some PFAS in the food matrices (Table 1).1 The low
LOQ levels were due to the sensi�vity of the SCIEX 7500 system
and the extensive contamina�on reduc�on steps that were
implemented to reduce the PFAS background signal. The 7 food
matrices tested included, baby food puree (beef), milk-based
infant formula (as sold), full cream milk powder, fish, whole egg,
soluble coffee and fish oil. The method showed good precision at
the LOQ level for the 4 regulated compounds. The %CV was
<20% for most matrices and <25% for all matrices.
For more informa�on refer to the publica�on on which this
technical note is based.2
Key features of PFAS analysis in multiple foods
when using the SCIEX 7500 system
• Broad PFAS coverage. A method was developed and validated
for 57 PFAS compounds following the EURL POPs guidelines.
• Diverse food matrices. Mul�ple food matrices were tested
including baby food puree (beef), milk-based infant formula (as
sold), full cream milk powder, fish, whole egg, soluble coffee
and fish oil.
• Parts-per-trillion (ppt, µg/kg) sensi�vity. LOQs in food matrices
analysed were as low as 0.01 µg/kg
Quan�ta�on of PFAS in food with parts per trillion levels of
sensi�vity
Table 1. The EU recommended (Rec.) and achieved LOQ in-sample concentra�ons for the 4 regulated PFAS compounds. All
units are in µg/kg. (For more details, please see Tables 2 to 5). a: LOQ; b: indica�ve level. Indica�ve levels specify that further
inves�ga�on needs to be performed however, this does not stop the products from being put on the market.
Matrix PFOS PFOA PFNA PFHxS
Rec. Achieved Rec. Achieved Rec. Achieved Rec. Achieved
Eggs 0.3a 0.3 0.3a 0.3 0.3a 0.3 0.3a 0.3
Fish 0.1a 0.1 0.1a 0.1 0.1a 0.1 0.1a 0.1
Food for
infants and
young children
0.05b 0.01 0.05b 0.01 0.05b 0.01 0.05b 0.01
p 1
EPA method 533 for PFAS analysis in drinking water at low
parts-per-trillion levels
Using the SCIEX Triple Quad™ 5500+ LC-MS/MS System – QTRAP® Ready
Craig M. Butt1, Karl A. Oetjen1, Thep Phomsopha2
1 SCIEX, USA; 2 Eurofins ETA West Sacramento, USA
This application note describes PFAS drinking water analysis by
EPA Method 5331 using the SCIEX Triple Quad 5500+ LCMS/MS System – QTRAP Ready. Excellent sensitivity and
precision were shown. The “in-sample” minimum reporting limits
were 2 ng/L for all analytes except PFHpA (4 ng/L). Figure 1
shows MRM chromatograms for the novel perfluorinated ether
carboxylic and sulfonic acids in the 0.50 ng/mL standard, which
corresponds to 2 ng/L in sample. These values are significantly
below the US EPA drinking water guidelines of 70 ng/L for PFOS
and PFOA. Use of the custom built calculations and flagging
rules within the SCIEX OS Software were used to streamline
data review and report generation.
EPA Method 533 builds upon the previously published EPA
Methods 537 and 537.1, but with notable differences. Several
odd-chain PFSAs, short-chain PFCAs, FTS compounds and
novel perfluoroether carboxylates and sulfonates were added,
whereas the FOSAA acids (NEtFOSAA, NMeFOSAA) and longchain PFCAs (PFTA, PFTrDA) were excluded. Structures of the
novel compounds are shown in Figure 2. Similar to previous EPA
methods, water samples are concentrated using solid-phase
extraction (SPE) cartridges, but the choice of cartridge is flexible
and the sample volume can vary from 100-250 mL. In addition,
Method 533 incorporates the use of stable isotope dilution
standards to minimize matrix effects and improve data quality.
Key features of EPA method 533 on the
SCIEX 5500+ System
• Existing methods were adapted to meet challenges of novel
PFAS compounds
• Minimum reporting limits of 2 ng/L with excellent linear
dynamic range were achieved
• Method showed good peak and chromatographic resolution
of all compounds
• Data review and report generation was simplified through
use of SCIEX OS Software custom calculations and flagging
rules
Figure 1. MRM chromatograms for novel perfluorinated ether acids. MRM XICs for the novel perfluorinated ether acids are shown from the 0.50
ng/mL in-vial standard (2 ng/L in sample equivalent).
p 1
EPA method 533 for PFAS analysis in drinking water at low
parts-per-trillion levels
Using the SCIEX Triple Quad™ 5500+ LC-MS/MS System – QTRAP® Ready
Craig M. Butt1, Karl A. Oetjen1, Thep Phomsopha2
1 SCIEX, USA; 2 Eurofins ETA West Sacramento, USA
This application note describes PFAS drinking water analysis by
EPA Method 5331 using the SCIEX Triple Quad 5500+ LCMS/MS System – QTRAP Ready. Excellent sensitivity and
precision were shown. The “in-sample” minimum reporting limits
were 2 ng/L for all analytes except PFHpA (4 ng/L). Figure 1
shows MRM chromatograms for the novel perfluorinated ether
carboxylic and sulfonic acids in the 0.50 ng/mL standard, which
corresponds to 2 ng/L in sample. These values are significantly
below the US EPA drinking water guidelines of 70 ng/L for PFOS
and PFOA. Use of the custom built calculations and flagging
rules within the SCIEX OS Software were used to streamline
data review and report generation.
EPA Method 533 builds upon the previously published EPA
Methods 537 and 537.1, but with notable differences. Several
odd-chain PFSAs, short-chain PFCAs, FTS compounds and
novel perfluoroether carboxylates and sulfonates were added,
whereas the FOSAA acids (NEtFOSAA, NMeFOSAA) and longchain PFCAs (PFTA, PFTrDA) were excluded. Structures of the
novel compounds are shown in Figure 2. Similar to previous EPA
methods, water samples are concentrated using solid-phase
extraction (SPE) cartridges, but the choice of cartridge is flexible
and the sample volume can vary from 100-250 mL. In addition,
Method 533 incorporates the use of stable isotope dilution
standards to minimize matrix effects and improve data quality.
Key features of EPA method 533 on the
SCIEX 5500+ System
• Existing methods were adapted to meet challenges of novel
PFAS compounds
• Minimum reporting limits of 2 ng/L with excellent linear
dynamic range were achieved
• Method showed good peak and chromatographic resolution
of all compounds
• Data review and report generation was simplified through
use of SCIEX OS Software custom calculations and flagging
rules
Figure 1. MRM chromatograms for novel perfluorinated ether acids. MRM XICs for the novel perfluorinated ether acids are shown from the 0.50
ng/mL in-vial standard (2 ng/L in sample equivalent).
p 1
Analysis of PFAS in drinking water with EPA method 537.1
and the SCIEX QTRAP 4500 system
Achieving 537.1 method requirements in a robust 10-minute method
Simon Roberts1, Craig Butt1, Dan Wright2, Stephen Somerville2, KC Hyland1, Chris Borton1
SCIEX, USA1, EQI, Columbia, SC, USA2
In the United States, EPA method 537.1 describes the sample
preparation, reporting guidelines, and quality control for the
analysis of a suite of 14 per- and polyfluorinated substances
(PFAS) in drinking water. The EPA 537.1 method guidelines
provide some flexibility in the liquid chromatography tandem
mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) analysis. Within these
guidelines, optimization of certain aspects of the method, such
as column chemistry, chromatography, mobile phases, gradient
profile, and MS/MS transitions, was performed. Sample
preservation and preparation guidelines published in EPA 537.1
are prescriptive and were therefore closely followed.
Key features of PFAS analysis on the SCIEX
QTRAP 4500 system
• Robust and reproducible results with qualifying accuracy and
precision for calculated concentrations, asymmetry factor, and
linearity
• Total sample runtime takes only 8-10 min, depending on
autosampler settings and system dead volume
• Sensitive MDLs of 0.08-0.2 ng/L for the entire suite of 14
PFAS compounds
Table 1. PFAS in EPA method 537.1. Names, abbreviations, and
method detection limits (MDLs) for 14 PFAS compounds included in EPA
Method 537.1 along with the reporting limits (MRLs) published by the
UCMR3 guidelines 6 of the PFAS compounds. MDLs and MRLs shown
as ng/L (ppt) here.
Compound Abbreviation
Method
detection
limit (ng/L)
UCRM3
reporting limit
(ng/L)
Perfluorohexane
carboxylate PFHxA 0.09 -
Perfluoroheptane
carboxylate PFHpA 0.1 10
Perfluorooctane
carboxylate PFOA 0.1 20
Perfluorononane
carboxylate PFNA 0.09 20
Perfluorodecane
carboxylate PFDA 0.1 -
Perfluoroundecane
carboxylate PFUnDA 0.1 -
Perfluorododecane
carboxylate PFDoA 0.1 -
Perfluorotridecane
carboxylate PFTrDA 0.2 -
Perfluorotetradecane
carboxylate PFTeDA 0.2 -
Perfluorobutane sulfonate PFBS 0.1 90
Perfluorohexane sulfonate PFHxS 0.08 30
Perfluorooctane sulfonate PFOS 0.1 40
n-ethyl perfluorooctane
sulfonamidoacetic acid n-EtFOSAA 0.1 -
n-methyl perfluorooctane
sulfonamidoacetic acid n-MeFOSAA 0.09 -
p 1
Quantitation of PFASs in water samples using LC-MS/MS
large-volume direct injection and solid phase extraction
Simon Roberts1, KC Hyland1, Craig Butt1, Scott Krepich2, Eric Redman3, and Christopher Borton1
1SCIEX, USA; 2Phenomenex, USA; 3TestAmerica Laboratories, Sacramento, USA
PFASs are unique chemicals whose physicochemical properties
make them important for use in a variety of industrial and
consumer products including carpets, cookware, food packaging,
fire suppressants, and others1. Chemically, PFASs are aliphatic
structures containing one or more C atoms on which H
substituents have been replaced by F atoms. Classification and
naming is typically by the particular functional group present,
such as carboxylic acids, sulfonates, phosphonic acids, etc., as
well as the length of the carbon chain. Desirable in various
industrial applications for their chemical stability and low
reactivity, these properties also make PFASs highly resistant to
degradation in aquatic environments. Typical concentrations of
PFASs found in various environmental water sources range from
pg/L to µg/L levels2.
Human exposure to PFAS residues has been implicated in the
incidence of cancer, obesity, endocrine system disruption, and
other adverse health effects3-4. In recognition of these potential
risks, sources of human exposure to these chemicals (e.g., via
drinking water) are receiving public and scientific attention.
PFASs exhibit relatively high aqueous solubility and can be
transported and bioaccumulated from contaminated water
sources. The US EPA maintains health advisory limits for select
PFASs (e.g., perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) at a limit of 70 ng/L)
in water, but these levels have been exceeded in some areas
experiencing extreme point source inputs of these chemicals5.
Given the tremendous persistence of PFASs in the environment
and their known presence in human populations exposed via
drinking water and other environmental routes, demonstration of
the capability for accurate and precise low-level quantitation is
paramount for research and testing laboratories. Robust
quantitative analytical methods utilize the specificity and
sensitivity of LC-MS/MS with MRM monitoring. However, a
primary analytical challenge to this assay is the prevention and
reduction of background PFASs originating from the LC system
and contamination during sample collection and preparation.
This application note presents two methods for the quantitation
of per- and polyfluorinated alkyl substances (PFASs) in water
samples. While the MS/MS detection method using the SCIEX
Triple Quad™ 5500 System is similar between the two methods,
the sample preparation and injection volume differ significantly.
Key features of PFAS methods
• LC-MS detection using a Shimadzu LC-20ADXR coupled to a
SCIEX Triple Quad™ 5500 System
• Special modifications to the pumps and autosampler are
described to mitigate laboratory-based contamination of
PFASs.
• Use of a delay column for separation of a contamination
PFAS peak from the analytical peak
• The first method presented here utilizes a weak-anion
exchange solid phase extraction (SPE) method to concentrate
water samples for analysis using a 7.5 minute HPLC gradient.
• The second method utilizes dilution of a water sample in
methanol and direct injection of 950 µL of the diluted sample
using a 17.5 minute HPLC gradient.
• Large volume injection of an aqueous sample is intended to
achieve method sensitivity while reducing accumulated
background during sample concentration steps.
• Both methods achieved accurate quantitation at levels of
approximately 1-10 ng/L for more than 17 PFASs.
The PFAS lifecycle:
an overview6 | sciex.com 7
The forever changing world of PFAS testing PFAS the global
headline maker:
regulations from
around the world
The PFAS lifecycle:
an overview
Industry
collaborations:
a customer
success story
Solutions
at every level
PFAS around the
world: regional focus
(MDM) and trends
On-demand:
customer
collaborations
Phenomenex:
your partner in
PFAS-testing
consumables
Addressing the
challenges of
PFAS testing
SCIEX OS software:
when software
compliments
hardware
After-sales,
service, and support:
for all your needs
Technical
materials for each
component of the
PFAS lifecycle
PFAS regulations
around the world
Canada
Driving down from 30ng/L to 25ng/L
A goal of 30 ng/L for 25 PFAS in drinking
water to reduce health risks. This replaces
previous guidelines for PFOS, PFOA, and nine
other PFAS. The target is precautionary and
based on achievable treatment methods.
United States
First ever nationwide
drinking water standards
The EPA’s new regulation limits six
PFAS chemicals in drinking water,
aiming to protect 100 million people
and reduce health risks, with $1 billion
in funding to support compliance.
Brazil
Brazil’s Strides Towards Regulating
PFAS: Uncovering New Regulatory
Initiatives
Brazil’s National PFAS Control Policy Bill No. 2726/2023
aims to regulate PFAS by enforcing environmental
preservation, requiring annual reports from
companies, and promoting public awareness and
research. The bill has passed the first approval stage
and will move to the senate if it clears all stages.
Argentina
Lowest PFAS levels in the world
This study is the first to track human
PFAS exposure in Argentina, finding the
lowest maternal PFAS levels globally.
South Africa
Production and distribution prohibition
South Africa regulates per- and polyfluoroalkyl
substances (PFAS) by prohibiting the production,
distribution, and import of certain PFAS. These
regulations took effect in December 2021.
Australia
Lower limits proposed for drinking water
Australian Governments are managing PFAS contamination
by investigating its extent, breaking exposure pathways,
supporting communities, funding research, reviewing legislation,
and improving coordination across government levels.
China
Chinese government is working
to - reduce PFAS discharge
from industrial sources.
China’s Miniatry of Ecology and Environment
has drafted a pian to Inanage new poliutants.
The plan includes strict ragulationa on new
chamicalrepstrations, bans on harntul
chemicala, and morous standards for
hazardous chemica, content products.
Japan
Ban on 138 Chemicals
The Japanese government
proposed banning 138 PFAS
chemicals on January 10, 2025.
The ban will prohibit the
manufacture, import, and
use of these chemicals.
France
PFAS ban passed
France has passed a new
law banning PFAS (per- and
polyfluorcalky! substances)
in products like clothing and
cosmetics. PFAS are known as
“forever chemicals” due to their
persistence in the environment
and links to health issues such
as cancer and reduced fertility.
Despite some opposition and
the exclusion of cookware from
the ban, this law is a significant
step towards protecting public
health and the environment.
United Kingdom
A precautionary approach to regulation
In August 2024, the DWi updated guidelines for PFAS in drinking water. Water
companies in England and Wales must monitor more PFAS and update risk
assessments. The limit is 0.1 micrograms per litro for 48 specified.
PFAS the global
headline maker:
regulations from
around the world8 | sciex.com 9
The forever changing world of PFAS testing PFAS the global
headline maker:
regulations from
around the world
The PFAS lifecycle:
an overview
Industry
collaborations:
a customer
success story
Solutions
at every level
PFAS around the
world: regional focus
(MDM) and trends
On-demand:
customer
collaborations
Phenomenex:
your partner in
PFAS-testing
consumables
Addressing the
challenges of
PFAS testing
SCIEX OS software:
when software
compliments
hardware
After-sales,
service, and support:
for all your needs
Technical
materials for each
component of the
PFAS lifecycle
Industry
collaborations
0310 | sciex.com 11
The forever changing world of PFAS testing PFAS the global
headline maker:
regulations from
around the world
The PFAS lifecycle:
an overview
Industry
collaborations:
a customer
success story
Solutions
at every level
PFAS around the
world: regional focus
(MDM) and trends
On-demand:
customer
collaborations
Phenomenex:
your partner in
PFAS-testing
consumables
Addressing the
challenges of
PFAS testing
SCIEX OS software:
when software
compliments
hardware
After-sales,
service, and support:
for all your needs
Technical
materials for each
component of the
PFAS lifecycle
Industry collaborations:
a customer success story
S: Can you tell us a little
bit about OCWD?
LS: Here at Orange County Water District,
we have over 225 employees and our
lab consists of 35 team members
including five to six student interns. I’ve
worked here over 30 years, so having
spent more than half of my life here, I
look at OCWD as my second home! Our
main goal is to follow and adhere to
EPA standard methods for monitoring
drinking water quality, groundwater
surface water, and recycled water. We
conduct routine analysis on a daily
basis for results reporting. We test
approximately 1500 locations throughout
the central and northern Orange County,
including about 200 drinking wells, while
serving over 2.5 million residents.
S: What do your day-to-day
responsibilities look like?
LS: I stand as the working supervisor,
and I love being hands-on with the
method development process. When a
new PFAS testing method surfaces, I
am the one who sets up and develops
the method. On completion, the
method is certified online, then my
responsibility shifts to training our
staff. I and another co-supervisor
oversee the daily operation of our lab.
Our instrument portfolio includes
GC, GCMS, LC, HPLC, LC-MS/MS, and
each team member is responsible
for certain methods. For methods
like 524.2, we would have a team of
three staff members on samples
as it’s a heavy workload compared
to other automated methods.
Every morning, we have a group meeting:
So what needs to be done? Who’s doing
what? Each analyst would decide who
is processing and running which sets of
samples, and be prepared for any reruns,
retracts, or resampling. Once complete,
then the process moves to date analysis
and reporting. Sometimes, it can be
1-2 hours a day as my job also includes
trouble shooting and problem solving!
Even though it’s a workplace, it’s
always like a big family with everyone.
I try to make as a better place, and I
always enjoy being here every day.
S: Many of our users want to know
how you tackle the common problems
other labs face: contamination,
sample prep, the usuals!
LS: We are very good as a lab to handle,
and control, PFAS background. If we
had a background problem, we would
troubleshoot and determine if it’s
coming from the extraction, or from the
instrument, or from sample collection.
Step 1 – if the sample blank passes,
then that confirms the instrument is
fine and we eliminate that potential and
re-evaluate the extraction process. Is
it the filtration plate? Are there other
potential sources? Our protocol ensures
this is a rare occurrence though.
S: How do you ensure data
quality? Do you participate in any
Proficiency Testing programs?
LS: We perform PT every year between
April and May, when we do PT for both
533 and 537 and all other methods
within our lab. Our staff is great for
this because we always get 100%!
S: What has been your biggest challenge
and how did you overcome that?
LS: That has to be when I first started
setting up methods back in 2011, when
there were not too many people testing
for PFAS at the time. I had to figure
out myself. Background contamination
was the biggest challenge, for PFOA,
as well as LC separation. This is where
the community, and SCIEX, helped by
suggesting tweaks like delay columns.
Carryover was also a concern, but
eventually solved by automation. So my
advice for anyone out there is to connect
with your community and vendor.
S: We are always here to help and
provide an educational platform for
all interested users. How do you think
is the best way for us to deliver this?
LS:For me, it is technical support and
application notes: if the person have
never done the method or have no
experience with LCMS, I think it would
be good for a vendor to provide the
application note, guide them through
the process, and develop the method
with them. So I think the best way is
help the customer with PFAS testing,
is start with the basic method, and
they can improve from there.
For us internally, the most important
thing the analyst needs to learn is: how
to troubleshoot a problem. This is to
minimize downtime. We go through data
review regularly to make sure that they
know what to look for, like PFAS peaks.
I personally set out two or three solid
days with each analyst, to make sure
they understand everything, and go
through initial demonstration capability.
They have to demonstrate the capability
of three-day MDL and calculate the
PIR. We have very extensive training:
What does good look like?
A sneak-peek into Orange County Water District. We
had the privilege of interviewing Dr Lily Sanchez,
Supervising Chemist at OCWD, a collaborating lab,
to gain an insight of how an industry leading water
testing facility is run to the highest standards.
SCIEX (S), Dr Lily Sanchez (LS)
SCIEX provides us with
a lot of support. SCIEX is
always my number 1 go-to,
so it is the combination of
community collaboration
and vendor contacts.
We analyze PFAS daily, with
two 6500s, running up to
120 samples across both
Even though it’s a systems routinely.
workplace, it’s always like a
big family with everyone. I
try to make it a better place
and I always enjoy being
here every day.
Dr Lily Sanchez
Supervising
Chemist at
Orange County
Water District
(OCWD)
Industry
collaborations:
a customer
success story12 | sciex.com 13
The forever changing world of PFAS testing PFAS the global
headline maker:
regulations from
around the world
The PFAS lifecycle:
an overview
Industry
collaborations:
a customer
success story
Solutions
at every level
PFAS around the
world: regional focus
(MDM) and trends
On-demand:
customer
collaborations
Phenomenex:
your partner in
PFAS-testing
consumables
Addressing the
challenges of
PFAS testing
SCIEX OS software:
when software
compliments
hardware
After-sales,
service, and support:
for all your needs
Technical
materials for each
component of the
PFAS lifecycle
checklists of what needs to be done
at each stage, and once they pass all
of that, only then can they can report
the data. They are then considered
qualified analysts for date reporting for
the method they are assigned, as PFAS
testing is a constant training course!
S: What about the future? What do
you see if the next trend in testing
for PFAS in drinking water?
LS:From what I’m seeing lately, it’ll
be direct injection methods. I’m on
the standard method committee, and
we’re trying to develop that too. So
for the future, I think that we’ll need
more sensitive and faster methods,
which means more advanced LCMS
instruments. I want a 7500 for our lab!
So direct injections will be more common.
Reduced time means money saving
and shorter turnaround times: results
within 1 hour is ideal. Attention is also
shifting to non-targeted analysis,
and total organic fluorene. I expect to
see more compounds required on the
regulatory list, groundwater analysis, and
additional responsibilities for government
agencies like us to clean up those wells.
So for PFAS testing, it will depend on
how we adapt, develop methods to be
faster and more reliable, so we can
meet those growing PFAS demands.
S: As we close this insightful interview,
anything you’d like to add?
LS: The SCIEX and Phenomenex staff that
I’ve worked with, I feel like I can always
go ask them whenever I have questions
or problems. I come to them and they’re
always a good resource for me. They’re
always helping me, whenever I have a
This technical note demonstrates the
use of the PromoChrom automated
solid-phase extraction (SPE) system
for the analysis of PFAS in drinking
water following EPA Method 533.
Using the SCIEX QTRAP 6500+ system,
negligible background contamination
was observed as well as excellent
method performance in spikes into
reagent water and raw untreated
groundwater samples. Milli-Q water
blank spikes at 2, 40 and 70 ng/L showed
mean recovery ranging from 96% to
115% with the mean precision <10%
coefficient of variation (CV). Sample
matrix and duplicate spikes at 2 and 40
ng/L showed mean recovery between
95% and 122% with <13%CV. Analysis
of raw untreated groundwater samples
showed the detection of 5 out of the
6 EPA-regulated PFAS compounds.
Industry collaborations:
a customer success story
Automated solid-phase
extraction system for the
analysis of PFAS in drinking water
problem, they provide suggestions, and
t’s always worked out. And if not, they will
send me to somebody else. So I really
appreciate all of that. The support.
S: Well that is great to hear, and our
internal PFAS is always happy to
help any way we can. Thank you Lily,
for providing us your perspective
into your world of PFAS testing!
To learn more about what
Orange County Water County
does, check out this video:
Industry
collaborations:
a customer
success story14 | sciex.com 15
The forever changing world of PFAS testing PFAS the global
headline maker:
regulations from
around the world
The PFAS lifecycle:
an overview
Industry
collaborations:
a customer
success story
Solutions
at every level
PFAS around the
world: regional focus
(MDM) and trends
On-demand:
customer
collaborations
Phenomenex:
your partner in
PFAS-testing
consumables
Addressing the
challenges of
PFAS testing
SCIEX OS software:
when software
compliments
hardware
After-sales,
service, and support:
for all your needs
Technical
materials for each
component of the
PFAS lifecycle
Industry insights
In the dynamic field of water testing,
laboratories are facing an everincreasing sample load. More than
ever, the robustness of testing
systems has become a crucial factor
in delivering reliable results.
Hup and Abdessamad Chahbouni
from HET Waterlaboratorium in The
Netherlands, in collaboration with the
SCIEX European support team and Jianru
Stahl-Zeng, have developed a method
that stands out for its robustness.
This refined method is now running as
a routine application with unmatched
reliability, becoming a significant
asset to their laboratory’s offerings.
At HET Waterlaboratorium, 26 PFAS
compounds of interest can be measured
in diverse water samples, ranging
from drinking water to ground
and surface water. This broad and
reliable offering sets the lab apart in
the industry. In 2020 the European
Dring Water Directive set the limit
of PFAS in drinking water to 0.5 µg/L
for all identified PFAS compounds.
To ensure the safety of drinking
water the analysis of ground water
sources for contamination is vital to
protect drinking water sources.
The robustness of the method
developed by HET Waterlaboratorium
is demonstrated over a 15-month
period, during which preventive
maintenance was required only once.
Prior to this maintenance, calibration
specifications were consistently met
with only front-end cleaning needed.
This level of robustness is unmatched
in the industry, providing confidence
and reliability in the testing process.
The labs work includes collaborations
with Japanese research institutions
and involvement in PFAS-related
research beyond laboratory analysis,
such as tracking PFAS trends and
exploring PFAS remediation strategies.
The officially recognized methods
currently adopted in Japan mainly target
PFOA, PFOS, and PFHxS in drinking
water and environmental water.
Looking ahead, we expect there will be
increasing demand for regulations on
longer-chain PFAS, leading to a greater
focus on analytical methods that cover
a wider range of PFAS compounds.’
Among environmental samples,
water samples account for 60–70%,
while soil makes up about 30%. In
addition, exhaust gas from factories
and waste are also analyzed.’
A European case study of 15 months of robustness
A look to The Netherlands - HET Waterlaboratorium’s
PFAS testing methodA look to The Netherlands -
HET Waterlaboratorium’s 15 months of robustness.
Eurofins Japan
We have spoken to Ms Megumi Monden-san,
Mr. Hayao Ogata-san, Mr. Tomoya Nojima-san and
Miss Rosamond-san, and Ms. Machida-san from the
environment testing group at Eurofins Nihon Kankyo.
Having a reliable partner for method
development is crucial. The collaboration
between HET Waterlaboratorium
and the SCIEX European support
team exemplifies the importance
of teamwork in achieving scientific
excellence. Their combined expertise
has resulted in a method that not only
meets but exceeds industry standards,
ensuring that HET Waterlaboratorium
can continue to deliver high-quality
results to their customers.
Technical notes
An ultra-high sensitivity analysis of PFAS
compounds in multiple water sources
PFAS analysis on the SCIEX 7500
system: 15 months of robustness data
Megumi Monden
Manager
Hayao Ogata
Associate Manager
Eurofins Nihon Kankyo K.K.
Environment testing Japan POPs
(PFAS PCB) team
Industry
collaborations:
a customer
success story16 | sciex.com 17
The forever changing world of PFAS testing PFAS the global
headline maker:
regulations from
around the world
The PFAS lifecycle:
an overview
Industry
collaborations:
a customer
success story
Solutions
at every level
PFAS around the
world: regional focus
(MDM) and trends
On-demand:
customer
collaborations
Phenomenex:
your partner in
PFAS-testing
consumables
Addressing the
challenges of
PFAS testing
SCIEX OS software:
when software
compliments
hardware
After-sales,
service, and support:
for all your needs
Technical
materials for each
component of the
PFAS lifecycle
Adressing the
challenges of
PFAS testing
0418 | sciex.com 19
The forever changing world of PFAS testing PFAS the global
headline maker:
regulations from
around the world
The PFAS lifecycle:
an overview
Industry
collaborations:
a customer
success story
Solutions
at every level
PFAS around the
world: regional focus
(MDM) and trends
On-demand:
customer
collaborations
Phenomenex:
your partner in
PFAS-testing
consumables
Addressing the
challenges of
PFAS testing
SCIEX OS software:
when software
compliments
hardware
After-sales,
service, and support:
for all your needs
Technical
materials for each
component of the
PFAS lifecycle
Addressing the challenges
of PFAS testing
The
challenges
Addressing the
challenges of
PFAS testing20 | sciex.com 21
The forever changing world of PFAS testing PFAS the global
headline maker:
regulations from
around the world
The PFAS lifecycle:
an overview
Industry
collaborations:
a customer
success story
Solutions
at every level
PFAS around the
world: regional focus
(MDM) and trends
On-demand:
customer
collaborations
Phenomenex:
your partner in
PFAS-testing
consumables
Addressing the
challenges of
PFAS testing
SCIEX OS software:
when software
compliments
hardware
After-sales,
service, and support:
for all your needs
Technical
materials for each
component of the
PFAS lifecycle
Solutions
at every level
0522 | sciex.com 23
The forever changing world of PFAS testing PFAS the global
headline maker:
regulations from
around the world
The PFAS lifecycle:
an overview
Industry
collaborations:
a customer
success story
Solutions
at every level
PFAS around the
world: regional focus
(MDM) and trends
On-demand:
customer
collaborations
Phenomenex:
your partner in
PFAS-testing
consumables
Addressing the
challenges of
PFAS testing
SCIEX OS software:
when software
compliments
hardware
After-sales,
service, and support:
for all your needs
Technical
materials for each
component of the
PFAS lifecycle
The complete
solution guide
Software
An easy to learn software
system ensures fast result
interpretation that is
consistent and doesn’t create
a bottleneck for your sample
turnover. SCIEX OS qualitative
rules (“traffic lights”) are
used to quickly identify PFAS
detections. Custom calculated
columns tailored to EPA
requirements are available to
get you up and running fast.
LC
Built from the same legacy of innovation as all SCIEX products, these systems
deliver precision and robustness with the assurance of quality and support
you would expect from the leader in the quantification of molecules.
Service
Setting up PFAS testing from
scratch requires a bit of tweaking
in the beginning. When you are just
starting out a reliable support team
is as important as the system you
purchase. SCIEX support specialists
have years of PFAS experience
under their belt and get your lab
up to speed fast and for good.
SCIEX 4500 system
Sensitive and robust performance
meets all EPA method 533
performance criteria but is mainly
used in other environmental matrices
than drinking water where the
focus is on robust performance.
ZenoTOF 7600 system
Traditional fragmentation methods
using collision-induced dissociation
(CID) can be too aggressive to form
diagnostic MS/MS spectra. The
ZenoTOF 7600 system, electron
activated dissociation (EAD) has
shown potential as a form of
fragmentation to produce more
robust spectra for PFAS analysis.
X500R QTOF system
The greater selectivity from highresolution fragments provided
cleaner chromatograms with
lower background noise for
more sensitive quantitation and
increased analyte specificity for
more confident identification.
SCIEX 7500+ system
For ultimate quantitation of
trace level PFAS compounds,
the SCIEX 7500+ system is
the instrument of choice.
SCIEX 6500+ system
The LOQS of the European
Drinking Water Directive are easily
achievable with the QTRAP 6500+
system for all required PFAS
compounds and without SPE.
SCIEX 5500+ system
Excellent sensitivity and precision
to easily meet minimum reporting
limits of EPA method 533 with
excellent linear dynamic range.24 | sciex.com 25
The forever changing world of PFAS testing PFAS the global
headline maker:
regulations from
around the world
The PFAS lifecycle:
an overview
Industry
collaborations:
a customer
success story
Solutions
at every level
PFAS around the
world: regional focus
(MDM) and trends
On-demand:
customer
collaborations
Phenomenex:
your partner in
PFAS-testing
consumables
Addressing the
challenges of
PFAS testing
SCIEX OS software:
when software
compliments
hardware
After-sales,
service, and support:
for all your needs
Technical
materials for each
component of the
PFAS lifecycle
SCIEX 7500+ system
Enter the SCIEX 7500+ system, the mass
spectrometer providing the highest
sensitivity delivered by our instrument
fleet to-date. Combined with reliable
sample preparation steps and robust LC
chromatography methods, the 7500+
not only delivers trace-level quantitation
to meet the most demanding
needs, but also tackles challenging
matrices that were once thought to
be impossible to test by LC-MS/MS.
A few highlights before your download:
• Mass Guard technology actively
removed contaminating ions
in complex matrices, which
imparted exceptional robustness
to the SCIEX 7500+ system
• The SCIEX 7500+ system maintained
quantitative performance after
>7000 injections of food extracts
and solvent QC samples with most
PFAS analytes retaining >70% of
the initial peak area sensitivity
• The combination of SCIEX OS
software enhancements for
system performance tracking and
the extractable DJet+ assembly
offers increased flexibility for
user-initiated management of
system maintenance and uptime
• Equipped with the renowned
sensitivity of the SCIEX 7500 system,
the exceptional data stability and
robustness demonstrated by the
SCIEX 7500+ system deliver a
powerful and efficient platform
for PFAS analysis in food
Achieving exceptional robustness for
PFAS analysis in food with the nextgeneration SCIEX 7500+ system.
This technical note demonstrates
>2x robustness improvement for the
analysis of PFAS food extracts on the
SCIEX 7500+ system. At the end of
the study, comprising over 6400 food
matrix injections, the majority of PFAS
compounds (10 out 13) maintained
>70% of the initial sensitivity. Residue
analysis in food matrices is challenged
by the presence of interfering coextractables which can result in
instrument contamination and system
downtime. Here, the robustness of the
SCIEX 7500+ system and SCIEX 7500
system was evaluated in an accelerated
manner through an aggressive
sample preparation procedure and
by omitting the diverter valve. The
SCIEX 7500+ system features new
Mass Guard technology designed to
improve instrument robustness while
maintaining optimal sensitivity longer.
In the beginning of this eBook, we first asked the question:
How low can we go? Regardless of where you are in the world,
trace-level PFAS testing levels seem to be a pre-requisite for
an application to be deemed suitable for challenging assays.
26 | sciex.com 27
The forever changing world of PFAS testing PFAS the global
headline maker:
regulations from
around the world
The PFAS lifecycle:
an overview
Industry
collaborations:
a customer
success story
Solutions
at every level
PFAS around the
world: regional focus
(MDM) and trends
On-demand:
customer
collaborations
Phenomenex:
your partner in
PFAS-testing
consumables
Addressing the
challenges of
PFAS testing
SCIEX OS software:
when software
compliments
hardware
After-sales,
service, and support:
for all your needs
Technical
materials for each
component of the
PFAS lifecycle
Reporting out on concentrations
and amounts of analytes present
in a given matrix is the basis
of a targeted approach.
However, as we are all aware, there are
roughly 8000 to 12,000 potential PFAS
compounds in existence, depending on
how a family of analytes are classified
based on their fluorinated state. A
targeted MRM method simply cannot
accommodate such a large number
of compounds, especially when a
large number of them have not even
been identified. This is where a nontargeted approach, by the accurate
mass route, becomes a valuable method
of both discovery, identification,
and ultimately quantitation.
We present two applications that
addresses different components of the
PFAS lifecycle: PFAS characterization
in cosmetic products, and then a
demonstration of the power of EAD
technology on the ZenoTOF 7600
system to decipher specific structures
of PFAS molecules. Although these
are non-targeted approached for
analysis of PFAS from a discovery and
structural analysis point of view, there
remains a common goal of possessing
the ability to quantify concentrations
per unit of matrix for understanding
various levels of PFAS contamination.
Why do we need this when there is
no current government regulations
requirement for unknown PFAS
discovery, you ask? The answer lies
in the future of PFAS applications,
we should prepare and be ready for
anything coming our way, so allow
SCIEX to help you achieve that goal.
Characterizing PFAS in cosmetic
products using non-targeted
acquisition and Molecular
Profiler Software
- Leverage Data-Dependent
Acquisition (DDA) with the
ZenoTOF 7600 system to
characterize PFAS compounds
- Suspect screening and confirmation
by library matching against the
SCIEX Fluorochemical HR-MS/MS
Spectral Library can produce good
initial compound identification data
- Molecular Profiler, the software,
identifies PAPs-like properties with
diagnostic fragment ion screening
results in significant time-savings
Use of electron activated dissociation
(EAD) to elucidate PFAS structures
- The EAD approach collecting
MS/MS spectra generally can
generate more fragments to
help confirm compound identity
during a non-targeted analysis
- Ramping energy ranges over
a set time can product unique
fragments exclusive to a
particular class of compounds,
providing additional spectral
information for the identification
of nontargeted PFAS structures
So far, we have spent a large amount of time discussing the merits of
quantitation, and trace-level testing of PFAS compounds driven by sensitivity
and accuracy. These advantages are provided by a targeted approach
where the mass spec user is fully aware of the specific list of compounds
and analytes they are targeting for both identification and quantitation.
SCIEX ZenoTOF
7600 system
28 | sciex.com 29
The forever changing world of PFAS testing PFAS the global
headline maker:
regulations from
around the world
The PFAS lifecycle:
an overview
Industry
collaborations:
a customer
success story
Solutions
at every level
PFAS around the
world: regional focus
(MDM) and trends
On-demand:
customer
collaborations
Phenomenex:
your partner in
PFAS-testing
consumables
Addressing the
challenges of
PFAS testing
SCIEX OS software:
when software
compliments
hardware
After-sales,
service, and support:
for all your needs
Technical
materials for each
component of the
PFAS lifecycle
SCIEX 6500+
system
If certain regional regulations
of PFAS-testing do not require
the absolute trace-levels of low
sensitivity quantitation, then this
is an ideal and proven platform
to bestow your trust upon.
Here we highlight a PFAS application in
drinking water, employing the technique
of direct injection and detection by LCMS/MS. Baseline PFAS contamination
can be reduced to a minimum to
ensure the capture of high quality
MSMS spectra, while the power and
flexibility of the SCIEX OS software will
enable your lab to adhere to regional
requirements such as the European
Union (EU)’s Directive 2020/2184.
Automated solid-phase
extraction system for the
analysis of PFAS in drinking water.
This technical note demonstrates the
use of the PromoChrom automated
solid-phase extraction (SPE) system
for the analysis of PFAS in drinking
water following EPA Method 533.
Using the SCIEX QTRAP 6500+ system,
negligible background contamination
was observed as well as excellent
method performance in spikes into
reagent water and raw untreated
groundwater samples. Milli-Q water
blank spikes at 2, 40 and 70 ng/L showed
mean recovery ranging from 96% to
115% with the mean precision <10%
coefficient of variation (CV). Sample
matrix and duplicate spikes at 2 and 40
ng/L showed mean recovery between
95% and 122% with <13%CV. Analysis
of raw untreated groundwater samples
showed the detection of 5 out of the
6 EPA-regulated PFAS compounds.
One of our most popular ‘workhorse’
instruments ever built, the QTRAP 6500+
system continues to perform – handling large
numbers of injections with ease and reliability.
1
Craig M. Butt1, Lily Sanchez2, Prem Parmar2, Sam Lodge3
1 SCIEX, USA; 2 Orange County Water District, Fountain Valley, CA;
3 Phenomenex, USA
This technical note demonstrates the use of the PromoChrom
automated solid-phase extraction (SPE) system for the analysis
of PFAS in drinking water following EPA Method 533. Using the
SCIEX QTRAP 6500+ system, negligible background
contamination was observed as well as excellent method
performance in spikes into reagent water and raw untreated
groundwater samples. Milli-Q water blank spikes at 2, 40 and 70
ng/L showed mean recovery ranging from 96% to 115% with the
mean precision <10% coefficient of variation (CV). Sample
matrix and duplicate spikes at 2 and 40 ng/L showed mean
recovery between 95% and 122% with <13%CV (representative
chromatograms shown in Figure 1). Analysis of raw untreated
groundwater samples showed the detection of 5 out of the 6
EPA-regulated PFAS compounds.
Key benefits of the PromoChrom automated SPE
system for the analysis of PFAS in drinking water
• Automated sample extraction. Reduced sample preparation
time through the fast, reproducible extraction and clean-up
of drinking water samples
• Low system background contamination. Quality control
blanks predominantly showed non-detectable PFAS levels
• Excellent method performance in quality control spikes.
Method performance was evaluated with spikes into Milli-Q
water and raw untreated groundwater samples
• Real-world water samples. 10 raw untreated groundwater
samples analyzed to demonstrate method applicability
Automated solid-phase extraction system for the analysis of
PFAS in drinking water
Figure 1. Representative extracted ion chromatograms (XICs) in a 2 ng/L laboratory fortified sample matrix (LFSM) sample for the 6 EPA-regulated PFAS
compounds. Raw, untreated groundwater was used for the LFSM sample.
30 | sciex.com 31
The forever changing world of PFAS testing PFAS the global
headline maker:
regulations from
around the world
The PFAS lifecycle:
an overview
Industry
collaborations:
a customer
success story
Solutions
at every level
PFAS around the
world: regional focus
(MDM) and trends
On-demand:
customer
collaborations
Phenomenex:
your partner in
PFAS-testing
consumables
Addressing the
challenges of
PFAS testing
SCIEX OS software:
when software
compliments
hardware
After-sales,
service, and support:
for all your needs
Technical
materials for each
component of the
PFAS lifecycle
Our 5500+ suite of mass spectrometers
are capable for meeting two of the
guidelines set out by the institution.
Here we present how both the EPA
533 and EPA 1633 method are
delivered using the 5500+ system.
Key Features:
• Existing methods were
adapted to meet challenges
of novel PFAS compounds
• Minimum reporting limits of
2 ng/L with excellent linear
dynamic range were achieved
• Method showed good peak and
chromatographic resolution
of all compounds
The combination of sample preparation,
and well-designed LC chromatography,
opens up some possibilities around the
type of hardware needed for some specific
requirements set out by the EPA.
SCIEX 5500+
system
p 1
EPA method 533 for PFAS analysis in drinking water at low
parts-per-trillion levels
Using the SCIEX Triple Quad™ 5500+ LC-MS/MS System – QTRAP® Ready
Craig M. Butt1, Karl A. Oetjen1, Thep Phomsopha2
1 SCIEX, USA; 2 Eurofins ETA West Sacramento, USA
This application note describes PFAS drinking water analysis by
EPA Method 5331 using the SCIEX Triple Quad 5500+ LCMS/MS System – QTRAP Ready. Excellent sensitivity and
precision were shown. The “in-sample” minimum reporting limits
were 2 ng/L for all analytes except PFHpA (4 ng/L). Figure 1
shows MRM chromatograms for the novel perfluorinated ether
carboxylic and sulfonic acids in the 0.50 ng/mL standard, which
corresponds to 2 ng/L in sample. These values are significantly
below the US EPA drinking water guidelines of 70 ng/L for PFOS
and PFOA. Use of the custom built calculations and flagging
rules within the SCIEX OS Software were used to streamline
data review and report generation.
EPA Method 533 builds upon the previously published EPA
Methods 537 and 537.1, but with notable differences. Several
odd-chain PFSAs, short-chain PFCAs, FTS compounds and
novel perfluoroether carboxylates and sulfonates were added,
whereas the FOSAA acids (NEtFOSAA, NMeFOSAA) and longchain PFCAs (PFTA, PFTrDA) were excluded. Structures of the
novel compounds are shown in Figure 2. Similar to previous EPA
methods, water samples are concentrated using solid-phase
extraction (SPE) cartridges, but the choice of cartridge is flexible
and the sample volume can vary from 100-250 mL. In addition,
Method 533 incorporates the use of stable isotope dilution
standards to minimize matrix effects and improve data quality.
Key features of EPA method 533 on the
SCIEX 5500+ System
• Existing methods were adapted to meet challenges of novel
PFAS compounds
• Minimum reporting limits of 2 ng/L with excellent linear
dynamic range were achieved
• Method showed good peak and chromatographic resolution
of all compounds
• Data review and report generation was simplified through
use of SCIEX OS Software custom calculations and flagging
rules
Figure 1. MRM chromatograms for novel perfluorinated ether acids. MRM XICs for the novel perfluorinated ether acids are shown from the 0.50
ng/mL in-vial standard (2 ng/L in sample equivalent).
EPA method 533 for PFAS
analysis in drinking water at
low parts-per-trillion levels
PFAS drinking water analysis by EPA
Method 5331 using the SCIEX 5500+
System. Excellent sensitivity and
precision were as shown; the “insample” minimum reporting limits
were 2 ng/L for all analytes except
PFHpA which was 4 ng/L. Novel
perfluorinated ether carboxylic and
sulfonic acids were detected in 0.50
ng/mL standard, which corresponds to
2 ng/L in sample, significantly below
the US EPA drinking water guidelines
of 70 ng/L for PFOS and PFOA. Custom
built calculations and flagging rules
in SCIEX OS Software streamlined
data review and report generation.
32 | sciex.com 33
The forever changing world of PFAS testing PFAS the global
headline maker:
regulations from
around the world
The PFAS lifecycle:
an overview
Industry
collaborations:
a customer
success story
Solutions
at every level
PFAS around the
world: regional focus
(MDM) and trends
On-demand:
customer
collaborations
Phenomenex:
your partner in
PFAS-testing
consumables
Addressing the
challenges of
PFAS testing
SCIEX OS software:
when software
compliments
hardware
After-sales,
service, and support:
for all your needs
Technical
materials for each
component of the
PFAS lifecycle
The EPA method 537.1 was one of
the first EPA regulation specifically
identifying a certain number of PFAS
compounds needing to be tested in a
single mass spectrometry method.
SCIEX 4500
system
Compound Abbreviation Method detection
limit (ng/mL)
UCRM3 reporting
limit (ng/mL)
Perfluorohexane carboxylate PFHxA 0.09 -
Perfluoroheptane carboxylate PFHpA 0.1 10
Perfluorooctane carboxylate PFOA 0.1 20
Perfluorononane carboxylate PFNA 0.09 20
Perfluorodecane carboxylate PFDA 0.1 -
Perfluoroundecanecarboxylate PFUnDA 0.1 -
Perfluorododecane carboxylate PFDoA 0.1 -
Perfluorotridecane carboxylate PFTrDA 0.2 -
Perfluorotetradecane carboxylate PFTeDA 0.2 -
Perfluorobutane sulfonate PFBS 0.1 90
Perfluorohexane sulfonate PFHxS 0.08 30
Perfluorooctane sulfonate PFOS 0.1 40
n-ethyl perfluorooctane sulfonamidoacetic acid n-EtFOSAA 0.1 -
n-methyl perfluorooctane sulfonamidoacetic acid n-MeFOSAA 0.09 -
In this case, the QTRAP 4500 system,
was used and proved to be sufficient to
quantify 14 PFAS compounds in drinking
water, rounding out the entire SCIEX
mass spectrometer suite to highlight
that there is a different solution for
any requirement you might need.
Key Features:
• Robust and reproducible results with
qualifying accuracy and precision
for calculated concentrations,
asymmetry factor, and linearity
• Total sample runtime takes only
8-10 min, depending on autosampler
settings and system dead volume
• Sensitive MDLs of 0.08-0.2
ng/L for the entire suite of
14 PFAS compounds
Analysis of PFAS in drinking
water with EPA method 537.1
In order to protect the safety of drinking
water and human health, the EPA
releases methods for the detection of
contaminants. The EPA method 537.1
describes the detection of selected perand polyfluorinated alkyl substances in
drinking water. Here a robust LC-MRM
assay was developed using the QTRAP
4500 system for PFAS detection.
Sensitive MDLs of 0.08-0.2 ng/L for all
of 14 PFAS compounds in EPA method
537 were achieved, all of which meet
or exceed the requirements of the US
EPA’s UCMR3 list in a 10-minute run.
34 | sciex.com 35
The forever changing world of PFAS testing PFAS the global
headline maker:
regulations from
around the world
The PFAS lifecycle:
an overview
Industry
collaborations:
a customer
success story
Solutions
at every level
PFAS around the
world: regional focus
(MDM) and trends
On-demand:
customer
collaborations
Phenomenex:
your partner in
PFAS-testing
consumables
Addressing the
challenges of
PFAS testing
SCIEX OS software:
when software
compliments
hardware
After-sales,
service, and support:
for all your needs
Technical
materials for each
component of the
PFAS lifecycle
Controlling carryover
with the ExionLC
AE system
Background levels for PFAS were less
and 1/3 of the lower concentration
standard (1ppt or 1pg/mL), less than
1% variation for mean CVs, and much
more. Check out how the ExionLC AE
system can enable you to do just that:
Key Features:
• Low system carryover:
Limit carryover using the
ExionLC AE system to <1/3 of
the calculated maximum residue
limit (MRL) for PFAS testing
• Negligible system background:
Attain background blank samples
consistently <1/3 of the lowest
concentration standard (1 ppt)
• Repeatability across injections:
Obtain consistent results across 55
injections with an average %CV value
of 3.1% across all compounds tested
While the solutions presented here so far are hardware
driven from the mass spectrometer perspective, there
are some distinct advantages available through the liquid
chromatography system that provide an extra level of analysis,
especially when it comes to minimizing carryover from sample
to sample, and reducing background contamination.
Controlling carryover and background
contamination in PFAS analysis
using the ExionLC AE system
In this technical note, the combined
use of the ExionLC AE system and the
ExionLC AE PFAS kit demonstrated
negligible system background and
low system carryover, which enabled
sensitive and precise quantitation of
per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances.
Having an HPLC system that contains
minimal PFAS contamination is crucial
for ensuring the accuracy and reliability
of analytical results. PFAS, known for
their persistence and environmental
concerns, can contaminate HPLC
equipment, leading to inaccurate data
and potential misinterpretation of
results. An HPLC system with limited
PFAS contamination and low background
levels helps prevent inaccurate
results, aids detection and ensures
compliance with increasingly stringent
regulations related to PFAS use.
36 | sciex.com 37
The forever changing world of PFAS testing PFAS the global
headline maker:
regulations from
around the world
The PFAS lifecycle:
an overview
Industry
collaborations:
a customer
success story
Solutions
at every level
PFAS around the
world: regional focus
(MDM) and trends
On-demand:
customer
collaborations
Phenomenex:
your partner in
PFAS-testing
consumables
Addressing the
challenges of
PFAS testing
SCIEX OS software:
when software
compliments
hardware
After-sales,
service, and support:
for all your needs
Technical
materials for each
component of the
PFAS lifecycle
SCIEX OS
software:
when software
compliments hardware
0638 | sciex.com 39
The forever changing world of PFAS testing PFAS the global
headline maker:
regulations from
around the world
The PFAS lifecycle:
an overview
Industry
collaborations:
a customer
success story
Solutions
at every level
PFAS around the
world: regional focus
(MDM) and trends
On-demand:
customer
collaborations
Phenomenex:
your partner in
PFAS-testing
consumables
Addressing the
challenges of
PFAS testing
SCIEX OS software:
when software
compliments
hardware
After-sales,
service, and support:
for all your needs
Technical
materials for each
component of the
PFAS lifecycle
SCIEX OS: when software
compliments hardware
Users want to load their samples and
push a button—without the need to
monitor the system until data are
acquired, processed and ready for
review—and during data review, they
want to be able to easily identify
outliers and failed samples. SCIEX OS
software brings this vision to life with an
easy-to-use interface and automated
batch-building tools. It also provides
automated customizable decision
rules that immediately determine
what to do with a sample that fails
acceptance criteria and automated data
processing and sample flagging rules.
While Analyst software was the flagship
data acquisition and processing
software for SCIEX triple quadrupole
and QTRAP systems, SCIEX OS software
is the platform of the future, bringing
all SCIEX mass spectrometers under
a single software for acquisition
and processing. With advanced
tools that streamline and automate
workflows like never before, and data
security with built-in 21 CFR Part 11
compliance tools, SCIEX OS software
can transform the way you work.
The technical debt incurred by not
maintaining up-to-date software
can be detrimental to the overall
efficiency of the lab. With regular
cadence updates to SCIEX OS software,
driven by the feedback we gain from
our users through various channels,
we strive to continue to serve our
customers in the best way possible.
Mass spectrometry has become the gold standard
solution for quantitative analytical assays in many
applications, from PFAS testing to pharmaceutical drug
research and development. Software plays a key role in
all these applications, because without it, we can’t drive
the instrument or process the data it generates.
SCIEX OS calculated columns and
custom flagging for PFAS applications:
EPA methods 533 and 1633
Engineered to do more. Faster.
The integrated software platform
solution for all SCIEX innovations, SCIEX
OS software delivers data integrity,
seamless usability and efficiency
gains for your mass spectrometry
workflows throughout your laboratory.
Built on advanced and sophisticated
algorithms, SCIEX OS software
facilitates instrument control and
automated data processing, simplifying
your workflows and empowering swift,
well informed decision-making.
This technical note demonstrates the
formulation of several quality control
(QC) calculations and flagging rules
directly within the SCIEX OS software for
EPA PFAS Methods 533 and 1633. Using
the Calculated Columns feature in the
processing method, SCIEX OS eliminates
the need to export the data to a thirdparty software platform, minimizing
data processing and review time. In
addition, the development of Custom
Flagging rules within SCIEX OS allows
for the quick review of data outside of
the EPA criteria. The flexibility of SCIEX
OS is shown, highlighting the ability to
adapt to changing QC requirements.
1
Craig M. Butt1, Megumi Shimizu1, Karl Oetjen1
SCIEX, USA
This technical note demonstrates the formulation of several
quality control (QC) calculations and flagging rules directly
within the SCIEX OS software for EPA PFAS Methods 533 and
1633. Using the Calculated Columns feature in the processing
method, SCIEX OS eliminates the need to export the data to a
third-party software platform, minimizing data processing and
review time (Figure 1). In addition, the development of Custom
Flagging rules within SCIEX OS allows for the quick review of
data outside of the EPA criteria. The flexibility of SCIEX OS is
shown, highlighting the ability to adapt to changing QC
requirements.
Key benefits of using SCIEX OS calculated columns
and custom flagging for EPA PFAS methods 533
and 1633
• Flexibility to build QC calculations for EPA PFAS methods.
Calculated Columns feature in SCIEX OS was used to build
extensive QC equations for EPA methods 533 and 1633;
calculation output directly within Results Table
• Rapidly identify out-of-range QC samples. Custom
Flagging rules were developed in SCIEX OS to flag QC
samples that were outside of acceptance criteria range
• Data processing and review time saved. Ability to formulate
QC calculations and flagging rules directly in SCIEX OS
reduces the time spent on data processing and review
SCIEX OS calculated columns and custom flagging for PFAS
applications: EPA methods 533 and 1633
Figure 1. Screenshots of the Calculated Columns and Flagging Rules features in SCIEX OS
April Quinn-Paquet
Global Marketing Product
Manager, Software
40 | sciex.com 41
The forever changing world of PFAS testing PFAS the global
headline maker:
regulations from
around the world
The PFAS lifecycle:
an overview
Industry
collaborations:
a customer
success story
Solutions
at every level
PFAS around the
world: regional focus
(MDM) and trends
On-demand:
customer
collaborations
Phenomenex:
your partner in
PFAS-testing
consumables
Addressing the
challenges of
PFAS testing
SCIEX OS software:
when software
compliments
hardware
After-sales,
service, and support:
for all your needs
Technical
materials for each
component of the
PFAS lifecycle
07
PFAS around
the world:
regional focus and trends42 | sciex.com 43
The forever changing world of PFAS testing PFAS the global
headline maker:
regulations from
around the world
The PFAS lifecycle:
an overview
Industry
collaborations:
a customer
success story
Solutions
at every level
PFAS around the
world: regional focus
(MDM) and trends
On-demand:
customer
collaborations
Phenomenex:
your partner in
PFAS-testing
consumables
Addressing the
challenges of
PFAS testing
SCIEX OS software:
when software
compliments
hardware
After-sales,
service, and support:
for all your needs
Technical
materials for each
component of the
PFAS lifecycle
PFAS around the world:
regional focus and trends
North America
PFAS around the world
Europe
Karl Oetjen
Market development
Manager, Americas
This rule marks a significant milestone
in the U.S. and has major implications
for the Americas, as other countries
continue to address PFAS and
develop their own regulations.
In response, there is now a heightened
urgency among U.S. public water
systems to align with these new
standards. It’s estimated that 6-10%
of the 66,000 public drinking water
systems nationwide may need to
take action to reduce PFAS levels
to comply with these regulations.
They are preparing to undertake
comprehensive monitoring over the
next three years and developing
strategies to mitigate any exceedances
of PFAS compounds within five years.
Additionally, we have observed a
notable increase in PFAS soil testing
in our region. As awareness of PFAS
contamination grows, stakeholders
are not only focusing on drinking water
but also on the broader environmental
impact of these chemicals. Soil testing
has become a critical component
in identifying and mitigating PFAS
contamination at its source, helping
to prevent further spread to water
supplies and agricultural products.
This comprehensive approach is
essential for effectively managing
PFAS pollution and protecting both
public health and the environment.
The scope of analytes to be quantified
includes compounds listed in the EU
Commission Recommendation, EU
2022/1431. The Commission Regulation
EU 2022/2388 was followed to ensure
that enforced limits are met for the
relevant PFAS compounds mentioned.
These regulations have been driving the
demand for testing with high sensitivity,
selectivity and reliability. SCIEX experts,
in collaboration with users and thought
leaders, have been able to continuously
improve our solutions and provide
optimized support for our customers.
Besides tap water and environmental
water, there are individual needs
such as the development of PFAS
purification systems and the
measurement of PFAS in wastewater.
Given the anticipated strengthening
of regulations worldwide and the
extensive variety of PFAS, estimated
to be around 5000 types, there could
be a demand for both targeted and
non-targeted PFAS measurements.
Confident quantification of per - and
polyfluoroalkyl substances in water
intended for human consumption.
The recent announcement of the EPA’s final testing
limits for PFAS marks the introduction of the United
States’ first-ever national, legally enforceable drinking
water standard aimed at protecting communities
from exposure to these harmful substances.
PFAS compounds are now considered to be of major
concern due to their inherent bio-accumulation
potential. This concern has become apparent to
regulators who are increasingly extending testing
requirements for these compounds, which is
impacting food manufacturers and producers.
Dan McMillian
Senior Market
Development
Manager, EMEAI
44 | sciex.com 45
The forever changing world of PFAS testing PFAS the global
headline maker:
regulations from
around the world
The PFAS lifecycle:
an overview
Industry
collaborations:
a customer
success story
Solutions
at every level
PFAS around the
world: regional focus
(MDM) and trends
On-demand:
customer
collaborations
Phenomenex:
your partner in
PFAS-testing
consumables
Addressing the
challenges of
PFAS testing
SCIEX OS software:
when software
compliments
hardware
After-sales,
service, and support:
for all your needs
Technical
materials for each
component of the
PFAS lifecycle
PFAS around the world
China
PFAS around the world
Japan
PFOA, PFOS, and PFHxS have been listed
as the key controlled new pollutants,
which prohibits their production,
processing, use, import, and export.
China’s new Standards for Drinking
Water Quality (GB 5749-2022) set
limits for PFOA and PFOS in tap water
at <80 ng/L and 40 ng/L, respectively.
This regulation represents the first
Chinese guideline of PFAS in drinking
water employing LC-MS/MS. Meanwhile,
the government will strengthen PFAS
source prevention and control, with a
particular focus on construction projects
in key industries such as petrochemicals,
coatings, textile printing and dyeing,
rubber, pesticides, pharmaceuticals,
electroplating, and tanning. With the
continuous improvement of technology
and policies, China strives to effectively
control PFAS pollution and promote
the sustained improvement of
ecological and environmental quality.
However, in June 2024, the Food Safety
Commission of Japan conducted
a health impact assessment of
perfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) and
determined that a TDI (tolerable daily
intake) of 20 ng/kg body weight/day
for both PFOS and PFOA is appropriate.
As a result, this is now considered the
standard for monitoring PFAS in food.
Additionally, investigations involving the
collection of concentration distribution
data for PFAS in drinking water, food, and
other potential exposure sources are
expected to be conducted in the future.
Besides tap water and environmental
water, there are individual needs
such as the development of PFAS
purification systems and the
measurement of PFAS in wastewater.
Given the anticipated strengthening
of regulations worldwide and the
extensive variety of PFAS, estimated
to be around 5000 types, there could
be a demand for both targeted and
non-targeted PFAS measurements.
The Chinese government has released
the “Action Plan for the Treatment of New
Pollutants,” aiming to address PFAS pollution
through investigation, monitoring, risk
assessment, and whole-process control.
Currently in Japan, provisional target values
for PFOA and PFOS have been established
for tap water and environmental water, but
the measurement is not mandatory.
Haiyan Cheng
Senior Market
Development
Manager, China
Kai Uchiumi
Market Development
Manager, Japan
46 | sciex.com 47
The forever changing world of PFAS testing PFAS the global
headline maker:
regulations from
around the world
The PFAS lifecycle:
an overview
Industry
collaborations:
a customer
success story
Solutions
at every level
PFAS around the
world: regional focus
(MDM) and trends
On-demand:
customer
collaborations
Phenomenex:
your partner in
PFAS-testing
consumables
Addressing the
challenges of
PFAS testing
SCIEX OS software:
when software
compliments
hardware
After-sales,
service, and support:
for all your needs
Technical
materials for each
component of the
PFAS lifecycle
PFAS around the world
Southeast Asia
PFAS around the world
Australia and New Zealand
Despite lacking strict regulations
in most nations, Singapore stands
out for its proactive approach. The
Singapore Food Agency (SFA) diligently
monitors PFAS levels, setting stringent
limits aligned with global standards.
Employing cutting-edge technology like
liquid chromatography-tandem mass
spectrometry (LC-MS/MS), SFA ensures
accurate and sensitive detection
of PFAS compounds in diverse food
samples. Their findings, particularly in
seafood, underscore their commitment
to consumer safety. While current levels
pose minimal risk, ongoing surveillance
and alignment with international
standards remain paramount.
For the broader ASEAN region, SeeChung Yip and his SEA application team
from SCIEX offer invaluable support
and consultation for PFAS testing in
food, ensuring a concerted effort to
address this critical health concern.
Asia Summit: PFAS testing in the East
There are now PFAS-contaminated
sites around Australia resulting from
these various uses. Over time, the
chemicals have worked their way across
and through the soil to contaminate
surface and ground water, and have
migrated into adjoining land areas.
PFAS are also present in waste streams,
including at landfills and wastewater
treatment facilities, and more broadly
in the environment. The PFAS National
Environmental Management Plan (PFAS
NEMP), developed by all state, territory
and the Australian Governments, as
well as the New Zealand Government,
through HEPA’s National Chemicals
Working Group, provides nationally
agreed guidance and standards on
the investigation, assessment and
management of PFAS wastes and
contamination in the environment,
including prevention of the spread of
contamination. The final PFAS NEMP
2.0 was agreed by Heads of EPAs in
October 2019 and published in May
2020. A NEMP 3.0 has been drafted and
the Nation Chemical Working Group has
received feedback from the public, which
is expected to be finalised in 2024.
The new guidance focuses on
the following SIX areas:
1. PFAS family - international
approaches to grouping of PFASs
2. Environmental data and monitoring
guidance on ambient monitoring
data collection and land use
classifications to enable comparability
3. Water-risk-based criteria
and guidance for beneficial
reuse of biosolids
4. Soil - guidance and standards around
PFAS behaviour in soil, including
leaching and associated ecological
and human health guidance. It
finalises and reviews two guideline
values already in the NEMP and
proposes two new guideline values
for soil and one for wildlife diet
5. Resource recovery and waste
guidance on management of
risks associated with PFASin
resource recovery products
6. Site specific guidance - guidance
on principles and approaches to
remediation and management;
guidance on construction water;
and guidance on estuarine,
coastal and marine sediment
PFAS Testing in food: Safeguarding
consumer health in the wider Asia region.
The presence of PFAS chemicals in
food is an emerging concern across
ASEAN countries, with recent studies
revealing varied contamination levels.
In Australia and New Zealand, PFAS
have been used for a long time in a
wide range of consumer products and
industrial applications, including certain
firefighting foams. The Australian
Industrial Chemicals Introduction Scheme
(AICIS) provides information on PFASs.
See Chung Yip
Field Application and
Market Development
Manager
Charlie Liu
Field Applications and Market
Development Specialist
48 | sciex.com 49
The forever changing world of PFAS testing PFAS the global
headline maker:
regulations from
around the world
The PFAS lifecycle:
an overview
Industry
collaborations:
a customer
success story
Solutions
at every level
PFAS around the
world: regional focus
(MDM) and trends
On-demand:
customer
collaborations
Phenomenex:
your partner in
PFAS-testing
consumables
Addressing the
challenges of
PFAS testing
SCIEX OS software:
when software
compliments
hardware
After-sales,
service, and support:
for all your needs
Technical
materials for each
component of the
PFAS lifecycle
After sales,
service, and
support: for all
your needs
0850 | sciex.com 51
The forever changing world of PFAS testing PFAS the global
headline maker:
regulations from
around the world
The PFAS lifecycle:
an overview
Industry
collaborations:
a customer
success story
Solutions
at every level
PFAS around the
world: regional focus
(MDM) and trends
On-demand:
customer
collaborations
Phenomenex:
your partner in
PFAS-testing
consumables
Addressing the
challenges of
PFAS testing
SCIEX OS software:
when software
compliments
hardware
After-sales,
service, and support:
for all your needs
Technical
materials for each
component of the
PFAS lifecycle
Why choose
SCIEX service?
After sales, service, and
support: for all your needs
Ensure peak performance
with SCIEX servicing
and support
• Maximize Uptime: Keep your lab
productive with guaranteed onsite
response, parts delivery, and remote
monitoring services for a swift
return to full operational status
• Full SCIEX Coverage: Benefit from
unparalleled expertise, parts
availability, and training across the
entire SCIEX portfolio of instruments,
workflows, and software
• Total Workflow Support: From
instrument installations to
relocations, software training,
workflow validations, and more,
SCIEX provides comprehensive
support for your entire workflow
Ensure your lab’s success with SCIEX’s
dedicated servicing and support,
designed to keep your PFAS testing
system at peak performance. Discover
a service package that meets your
needs and budget by visiting SCIEX
Instrument Service and Support
Regular maintenance of both hardware
and software is crucial for efficient
laboratory operations. A well-serviced
mass spectrometer system can
achieve up to 18% higher productivity
compared to one without a service plan.
SCIEX offers a range of service plans and
packages to support your SCIEX LC-MS/
MS systems throughout their lifespan.
These plans include genuine parts,
software, and expert assistance to meet
your workflow needs. Whether you have
a legacy instrument or the latest model,
SCIEX service plans ensure consistent
service, support, and satisfaction.
For more information,
visit SCIEX service.
SCIEX Now
• Manage your instruments.
• Submit and manage support cases,
track status and view history.
• Access online training courses and articles.
• Manage software licenses linked
to your registered instruments.
• View and report critical instrument
statistics when connected to StatusScope
remote monitoring service.
• Be a part of the SCIEX community by
submitting questions and comments.
• Receive notifications from SCIEX with
content based on your preferences.
SCIEX Now learning hub
• SCIEX Now learning hub success
programs provide LC-MS and CE training
customized to meet your exact needs.
• With a selection of training methods and
certifications available, you can build
a mass spectrometry program that is
most suited to your lab and users.
• Starting with a clear understanding of
your desired learning outcomes, we aim
to help you improve lab productivity
and consistency by designing and
delivering a program that is focused on
knowledge advancement and retention.
SCIEX Now support network
Maintaining and servicing
your PFAS testing system
Ensure peak performance with
SCIEX servicing and support
The success of your laboratory depends
on several critical factors: the expertise
of your staff, robust methodologies, and
the reliability of your PFAS testing LCMS/MS system. In a constantly changing
regulatory environment, it’s essential
to keep your system running at its best.
SCIEX servicing and support offer a
comprehensive range of preventative
maintenance services designed
to minimize downtime, preventing
costly sample backlogs and delays.
52 | sciex.com 53
The forever changing world of PFAS testing PFAS the global
headline maker:
regulations from
around the world
The PFAS lifecycle:
an overview
Industry
collaborations:
a customer
success story
Solutions
at every level
PFAS around the
world: regional focus
(MDM) and trends
On-demand:
customer
collaborations
Phenomenex:
your partner in
PFAS-testing
consumables
Addressing the
challenges of
PFAS testing
SCIEX OS software:
when software
compliments
hardware
After-sales,
service, and support:
for all your needs
Technical
materials for each
component of the
PFAS lifecycle
After sales,
service, and support:
for all your needs
Upskilling, refreshing
and advancing your
Team’s Knowledge
SCIEX provides a comprehensive
learning hub designed to enhance
your team’s skills and knowledge. This
hub offers a variety of free courses to
help your team upskill immediately.
Additionally, there are several paid
options for onsite training with a SCIEX
expert or hands-on experience in a
SCIEX classroom at a regional location.
Exclusive features of the
SCIEX Learning hub:
• Tailored technology:
Enhance training retention with
a personalized mix of online,
in-person courses, and
hands-on experience
• Flexible training options:
Learn at your own pace online,
receive training at one of SCIEX’s
global facilities or at your site
• Unlimited course access:
Enroll to gain unlimited access to over
300 courses, with no time restrictions
or additional commitments
• Centralized training management:
Easily browse the course catalog,
enroll in courses, track your
progress, and print transcripts and
certificates—all from a single login
Additional benefits
of upskilling for PFAS
testing using LC-MS/
MS with SCIEX:
• Unmatched analytical precision:
With SCIEX’s cutting-edge LC-MS/
MS technology, your team will achieve
unparalleled accuracy and reliability
in PFAS quantitation, setting new
standards in analytical performance.
• Enhanced contamination control:
Our training programs include
best practices to help minimize
background PFAS contamination,
ensuring your results are
consistently precise.
• Regulatory mastery:
Stay ahead of the curve with the
latest techniques and regulatory
updates. SCIEX training ensures
your team meets and exceeds
stringent environmental and health
standards for PFAS testing.
• Operational excellence:
Empower your team to optimize
workflows and troubleshoot with
ease. SCIEX-trained personnel work
more efficiently, delivering faster
and more effective PFAS analysis.
• Professional growth:
SCIEX’s commitment to continuous
learning fosters professional
development, keeping your
team motivated, engaged, and
at the forefront of their field.
54 | sciex.com 55
The forever changing world of PFAS testing PFAS the global
headline maker:
regulations from
around the world
The PFAS lifecycle:
an overview
Industry
collaborations:
a customer
success story
Solutions
at every level
PFAS around the
world: regional focus
(MDM) and trends
On-demand:
customer
collaborations
Phenomenex:
your partner in
PFAS-testing
consumables
Addressing the
challenges of
PFAS testing
SCIEX OS software:
when software
compliments
hardware
After-sales,
service, and support:
for all your needs
Technical
materials for each
component of the
PFAS lifecycle
09
On-demand:
customer
collaborations56 | sciex.com 57
The forever changing world of PFAS testing PFAS the global
headline maker:
regulations from
around the world
The PFAS lifecycle:
an overview
Industry
collaborations:
a customer
success story
Solutions
at every level
PFAS around the
world: regional focus
(MDM) and trends
On-demand:
customer
collaborations
Phenomenex:
your partner in
PFAS-testing
consumables
Addressing the
challenges of
PFAS testing
SCIEX OS software:
when software
compliments
hardware
After-sales,
service, and support:
for all your needs
Technical
materials for each
component of the
PFAS lifecycle
On-demand:
customer collaborations
Phase I: PFAS testing:
A scientific series
Our inaugural event kicked off the
scientific series soon after the
4ppq announcement from the EPA.
Not only was SCIEX first to market
with an application and technical
presentation with Eurofins California,
we also gathered 3 additional industry
experts, complemented by our internal
applications team, to deliver a userled roundtable. Click on the link to
access all the on-demand materials!
Phase II: PFAS in
food testing with
SCIEX OS software
As the conversation of PFAS-testing
gradually expands beyond drinking
water, the next component with
the PFAS lifecycle began to include
PFAS in food, and food packaging
materials. From farming, production,
to consumption, food encompasses
may aspects of our everyday lives,
and information is needed at all levels
to improve our understanding of its
presence. By extension, human exposure
is another area where we can start
to evaluate the impact and effects of
long-term PFAS exposure. All this, along
with the advantages of SCIEX OS for your
PFAS-testing needs, can be uncovered
here in our second PFAS Summit.
SCIEX PFAS summits:
Throughout the last few years, SCIEX have hosted our very own
PFAS Summits – Scientific Series. One of our goals was to provide
an educational channel for all mass spec users to come to an online
forum and exchange scientific ideas and technical knowledge,
while providing a platform for our industry-leading collaborators to
present their work in the PFAS-testing world to a global audience.
Amy Rand
Assistant Professor
Carleton University
Andrew Patterson
Technical Director,
Eurofins Specialty
Services
Cora Young
Associate Professor
and Guy Warwick Rogers
Chair York University
Christopher Higgins
PhD, University
University Distinguished Professor,
Colorado School of Mines
Pradeep Dewapriya
Postdoctoral Research Fellow,
The University of Queensland, Australia
Xanthippe Theurillat
R&D Specialist, Nestle,
Switzerland
Kevin Stroski
PhD candidate,
Baylor University
Cheryl Murphy
Professor and Director,
Center for PFAS Research,
Michigan State University, USA
Christian Lindh
Associate Professor and
Senior University Lecturer,
Lund University, Sweden
Anthony Williams
Scientist, Center of Computational
Toxicology and Exposure, US
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
Andrew Savage
Expert Chemist, NQAC,
Dublin, OH, USA
Yelena Sapozhn
Expert Chemist, USDA,
ARS, Wyndmoor, PA, USA
Christel Nielsen
Occupational and
Environmental Medicine,
Lund University, Sweden
58 | sciex.com 59
The forever changing world of PFAS testing PFAS the global
headline maker:
regulations from
around the world
The PFAS lifecycle:
an overview
Industry
collaborations:
a customer
success story
Solutions
at every level
PFAS around the
world: regional focus
(MDM) and trends
On-demand:
customer
collaborations
Phenomenex:
your partner in
PFAS-testing
consumables
Addressing the
challenges of
PFAS testing
SCIEX OS software:
when software
compliments
hardware
After-sales,
service, and support:
for all your needs
Technical
materials for each
component of the
PFAS lifecycle
On-demand:
customer collaborations
Phase III: A day in the life
of the PFAS lifecycle
After Phase II of our PFAS Summit,
our users were specifically requesting
addition topics to be discussed
around the PFAS lifecycle, as well
as specific examples of ‘what good
looks like’. For this event, we invited
industry leaders from NIST, the FDA,
post-doctoral researchers, to provide
yet another unique perspective into
other aspects of the detection and
quantitation of forever chemicals.
Amy Rand
Assistant Professor,
Charleton University, Canada
Annelise Blomberg
Postdoctoral Researcher,
Lund University, Sweden
Christian Lindh
Associate Professor and
Senior University Lecturer,
Lund University, Sweden
Larry Zintek
Organic Methods
Group Leader,
US EPA
Ben Place
Research Chemist, National Institute
of Standards and Technology (NIST)
Jeremy Gauthier
Postdoctoral Fellow,
University of Toronto, Canada
Pradeep Dewapriya
Postdoctoral Research Fellow,
Queensland Alliance of Environmental
Health Sciences (QAEHS)
Susie Genualdi
Research Chemist, Food and
Drug Administration (FDA)
Yuki Liang
Laboratory Technician, University
of British Columbia, Canada
60 | sciex.com 61
The forever changing world of PFAS testing PFAS the global
headline maker:
regulations from
around the world
The PFAS lifecycle:
an overview
Industry
collaborations:
a customer
success story
Solutions
at every level
PFAS around the
world: regional focus
(MDM) and trends
On-demand:
customer
collaborations
Phenomenex:
your partner in
PFAS-testing
consumables
Addressing the
challenges of
PFAS testing
SCIEX OS software:
when software
compliments
hardware
After-sales,
service, and support:
for all your needs
Technical
materials for each
component of the
PFAS lifecycle
Technical
materials
1062 | sciex.com 63
The forever changing world of PFAS testing PFAS the global
headline maker:
regulations from
around the world
The PFAS lifecycle:
an overview
Industry
collaborations:
a customer
success story
Solutions
at every level
PFAS around the
world: regional focus
(MDM) and trends
On-demand:
customer
collaborations
Phenomenex:
your partner in
PFAS-testing
consumables
Addressing the
challenges of
PFAS testing
SCIEX OS software:
when software
compliments
hardware
After-sales,
service, and support:
for all your needs
Technical
materials for each
component of the
PFAS lifecycle
Drinking water has been
identified as a significant
source of PFAS exposure.
Contamination can be through
nearby industrial plants –
from AFFF-impacted soils
and water – or from runoff
from agricultural fields.
A robust and sensitive routine
analysis method of 40 PFAS
compounds in surface water
using the SCIEX 7500 system
This technical note describes a
sensitive and robust method for the
analysis of per- and polyfluoroalkyl
substances (PFAS) in surface water
which is based on EU Directive
2020/2184 and WAC/IV/A/025 and
is accredited under the ISO 17025.
Automated solid-phase extraction
system for the analysis of
PFAS in drinking waters
This technical note demonstrates the
use of the PromoChrom automated
solid-phase extraction (SPE) system
for the analysis of PFAS in drinking
water following EPA Method 533.
1
Craig M. Butt1, Lily Sanchez2, Prem Parmar2, Sam Lodge3
1 SCIEX, USA; 2 Orange County Water District, Fountain Valley, CA;
3 Phenomenex, USA
This technical note demonstrates the use of the PromoChrom
automated solid-phase extraction (SPE) system for the analysis
of PFAS in drinking water following EPA Method 533. Using the
SCIEX QTRAP 6500+ system, negligible background
contamination was observed as well as excellent method
performance in spikes into reagent water and raw untreated
groundwater samples. Milli-Q water blank spikes at 2, 40 and 70
ng/L showed mean recovery ranging from 96% to 115% with the
mean precision <10% coefficient of variation (CV). Sample
matrix and duplicate spikes at 2 and 40 ng/L showed mean
recovery between 95% and 122% with <13%CV (representative
chromatograms shown in Figure 1). Analysis of raw untreated
groundwater samples showed the detection of 5 out of the 6
EPA-regulated PFAS compounds.
Key benefits of the PromoChrom automated SPE
system for the analysis of PFAS in drinking water
• Automated sample extraction. Reduced sample preparation
time through the fast, reproducible extraction and clean-up
of drinking water samples
• Low system background contamination. Quality control
blanks predominantly showed non-detectable PFAS levels
• Excellent method performance in quality control spikes.
Method performance was evaluated with spikes into Milli-Q
water and raw untreated groundwater samples
• Real-world water samples. 10 raw untreated groundwater
samples analyzed to demonstrate method applicability
Automated solid-phase extraction system for the analysis of
PFAS in drinking water
Figure 1. Representative extracted ion chromatograms (XICs) in a 2 ng/L laboratory fortified sample matrix (LFSM) sample for the 6 EPA-regulated PFAS
1 compounds. Raw, untreated groundwater was used for the LFSM sample.
Liesel Claeys1, Fred van Geenen2, Kevin Privat3, Fien Van Daele1,
Leen Vandekerckhove1, Said El Ouadi2, and Jianru Stahl-Zeng4
1VMM, Belgium, 2SCIEX, Netherlands, 3SCIEX, France, 4SCIEX,
Germany
This technical note describes a sensitive and robust method for
the analysis of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in
surface water which is based on EU Directive 2020/2184 and
WAC/IV/A/025 and is accredited under the ISO 17025. Using the
SCIEX 7500 system, a comprehensive method for 40 PFAS
compounds was developed with limits of detection (LODs)
ranging from 0.5 to 5 ng/L and limits of quantitation (LOQs)
ranging from 1 to 10 ng/L in surface water. The validation study
showed good accuracy, precision and 4-week shelf life for all
PFAS compounds. A thorough quality control program was
implemented to ensure consistent data quality during the routine
analysis. For example, the Shewhart chart for PFBS showed good
accuracy and instrument stability for the 60 ng/L standard (see
Figure 1). The use of the calculated columns and custom
flagging rules in the SCIEX OS software resulted in fast, efficient
data processing and review.
Key benefits for PFAS analysis in surface water
using the 7500 system
• Accreditation achieved with the flexible scope of ISO
17025: The method was based on EU directive 2020/2184
and WAC/IV/A/025
• Comprehensive method for PFAS in surface water: The
analyte panel covered 40 PFAS compounds, including 6
compounds that were reported as their total (branched +
linear) and linear isomers
• High levels of sensitivity: Surface water LODw values
between 0.5 – 5 ng/L and LOQw values between 1 – 10 ng/L
• Efficient data processing and review: SCIEX OS software
calculated columns and automated flagging rules were
integrated into the comprehensive quality control program
to streamline data analysis, achieving a 50% reduction in
data analysis time
A robust and sensitive routine analysis method of 40 PFAS
compounds in surface water using the SCIEX 7500 system
Figure 1: Shewhart control chart of 60 ng/L PFBS in surface water.
PFAS analysis on the SCIEX 7500
system: 15 months of robustness data
Demonstrates the robustness of
the SCIEX 7500 system over 15
months of routine PFAS analysis
with various water samples.
EPA method 533 for PFAS
analysis in drinking water at
low parts-per-trillion levels
Excellent sensitivity and precision
were as shown; the “in-sample”
minimum reporting limits were
2 ng/L for all analytes except
PFHpA which was 4 ng/L.
Simultaneous quantitation of
ultrashort-, short- and long-chain
PFAS in water by a single direct
injection LC-MS/MS method
This technical note describes a direct
injection LC-MS/MS method for the
simultaneous quantitation of ultrashort-,
short-and long-chain per- and
polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS).
p 1
For research use only. Not for use in diagnostics procedures.
PFAS analysis on the SCIEX 7500 system: 15 months of
robustness data
Kay Hup1, Abdessamad Chahbouni1, Jack Steed2, Bertram Nieland3, Said El Ouadi3, Daniel McMillan2 and
Jianru Stahl-Zeng4
1Het Waterlaboratorium; 2SCIEX, UK; 3SCIEX, The Netherlands; 4SCIEX, Germany
This technical note demonstrates the robustness of the SCIEX
7500 system over 15 months of routine PFAS analysis with
various water samples. Quality control (QC) samples, spiked at
10 ng/L with L-PFHxS, L-PFOS, L-PFOA and L-PFNA, showed
accuracies generally within ±1 standard deviation of the mean
and all QC samples were with 30% of the mean values (Figure
1). Only 1 preventative maintenance (PM) service was
performed during the 15-month timeframe. During the analysis,
approximately 100–200 injections were performed per week and
other non-PFAS applications were also run. These results
highlight the strong robustness of both the analysis method and
the SCIEX 7500 system.
A robust analysis is paramount to the long-term viability of
routine PFAS analysis. In this technical note, the developed
method was validated for 26 PFAS compounds of interest in LCMS-grade, drinking, ground and surface water samples.1
Modifications were made to the LC system to reduce background
contamination, including replacing or bypassing any components
of the system that contribute to PFAS contamination.
Specifically, system components containing fluorinated ethylene
propylene (FEP) and Teflon were bypassed or replaced with
polyether ether ketone (PEEK), when possible.
Key benefits of long-term PFAS analysis
using the SCIEX 7500 system
• Long-term stability of QC samples with no loss in
sensitivity: Robustness demonstrated by all QC samples
within ±30% of the mean over 15 months
• Minimal maintenance: Preventive maintenance was only
performed once during the 15-month period. Prior to the
preventive maintenance, the calibration specifications were
met with only front-end cleaning required.
• Diversity of water samples analyzed: Several different
water matrices were analyzed, including ground, surface and
drinking water
Figure 1. Percent accuracy plots of 4 regulated PFAS compounds at multiple timepoints. The plots highlight the robustness observed. The grey dotted
lines show ±1 standard deviation and the green dotted lines show ±3 standard deviations. During this period, no value fell outside of ±30% of the mean. The
QC samples were spiked into matrix and were representative of multiple different water samples.
10 ng/L L-PFOA
10 ng/L L-PFHxS
10 ng/L L-PFNA
10 ng/L L-PFOS
p 1
EPA method 533 for PFAS analysis in drinking water at low
parts-per-trillion levels
Using the SCIEX Triple Quad™ 5500+ LC-MS/MS System – QTRAP® Ready
Craig M. Butt1, Karl A. Oetjen1, Thep Phomsopha2
1 SCIEX, USA; 2 Eurofins ETA West Sacramento, USA
This application note describes PFAS drinking water analysis by
EPA Method 5331 using the SCIEX Triple Quad 5500+ LCMS/MS System – QTRAP Ready. Excellent sensitivity and
precision were shown. The “in-sample” minimum reporting limits
were 2 ng/L for all analytes except PFHpA (4 ng/L). Figure 1
shows MRM chromatograms for the novel perfluorinated ether
carboxylic and sulfonic acids in the 0.50 ng/mL standard, which
corresponds to 2 ng/L in sample. These values are significantly
below the US EPA drinking water guidelines of 70 ng/L for PFOS
and PFOA. Use of the custom built calculations and flagging
rules within the SCIEX OS Software were used to streamline
data review and report generation.
EPA Method 533 builds upon the previously published EPA
Methods 537 and 537.1, but with notable differences. Several
odd-chain PFSAs, short-chain PFCAs, FTS compounds and
novel perfluoroether carboxylates and sulfonates were added,
whereas the FOSAA acids (NEtFOSAA, NMeFOSAA) and longchain PFCAs (PFTA, PFTrDA) were excluded. Structures of the
novel compounds are shown in Figure 2. Similar to previous EPA
methods, water samples are concentrated using solid-phase
extraction (SPE) cartridges, but the choice of cartridge is flexible
and the sample volume can vary from 100-250 mL. In addition,
Method 533 incorporates the use of stable isotope dilution
standards to minimize matrix effects and improve data quality.
Key features of EPA method 533 on the
SCIEX 5500+ System
• Existing methods were adapted to meet challenges of novel
PFAS compounds
• Minimum reporting limits of 2 ng/L with excellent linear
dynamic range were achieved
• Method showed good peak and chromatographic resolution
of all compounds
• Data review and report generation was simplified through
use of SCIEX OS Software custom calculations and flagging
rules
Figure 1. MRM chromatograms for novel perfluorinated ether acids. MRM XICs for the novel perfluorinated ether acids are shown from the 0.50
ng/mL in-vial standard (2 ng/L in sample equivalent).
Holly Lee1, Simon Roberts2, Craig M. Butt2, Sam Lodge3, RenXi
Ye4, Cora Young4 and Trevor VandenBoer4
1SCIEX, Canada; 2SCIEX, USA; 3Phenomenex, USA; 4York
University, Canada
This technical note describes a direct injection LC-MS/MS
method for the simultaneous quantitation of ultrashort-, shortand long-chain per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS). in
water. Mixed-mode chromatography demonstrated robust
retention and separation for the wide range of PFAS chain
lengths tested. The sensitivity of the SCIEX 7500 system
enabled in-sample limits of quantitation (LOQs) of 0.2–10 ng/L
and method detection limits (MDLs) of 0.1–13 ng/L for most
target analytes. TFA, PFBA, 5:3 and 7:3 FTCAs, and 6:2 and 8:2
diPAP required higher LOQs (10–100 ng/L) due to background
contamination. Application of the method to tap water, rainwater
and lake water revealed the predominance of TFA at sub-to-low
µg/L levels (Figure 1).
Key benefits of the SCIEX 7500 system for
analyzing ultrashort-, short- and long-chain PFAS
• Robust retention and separation for a wide range of PFAS
chain lengths: Extensive chromatographic optimization
enabled stable retention times (RTs) for the ultrashort-chain
PFAAs and excellent separation from the void region.
• Accurate and reproducible quantitation at the LOQ: Mean
accuracy (±25%) and precision (%CV <25%) were achieved at
sub-to-low ng/L LOQs for most target PFAS.
• Good quantitative performance in tap water spikes:
Recoveries of 80–120% and precision %CV <20% for most of
the target PFAS were achieved in tap water spiked at 3
different concentrations.
• Detection in different aqueous matrices: Sub-ng/L to µg/L
levels of PFAAs were detected in real-world tap water,
rainwater and lake water.
Simultaneous quantitation of ultrashort-, short- and long-chain
PFAS in water by a single direct injection LC-MS/MS method
Figure 1. Quantitation of TFA in real-world aqueous matrices. Representative extracted ion chromatograms (XICs) of TFA demonstrate its ubiquity at sub-µg/L
levels in tap water, surface water and rainwater.
Water64 | sciex.com 65
The forever changing world of PFAS testing PFAS the global
headline maker:
regulations from
around the world
The PFAS lifecycle:
an overview
Industry
collaborations:
a customer
success story
Solutions
at every level
PFAS around the
world: regional focus
(MDM) and trends
On-demand:
customer
collaborations
Phenomenex:
your partner in
PFAS-testing
consumables
Addressing the
challenges of
PFAS testing
SCIEX OS software:
when software
compliments
hardware
After-sales,
service, and support:
for all your needs
Technical
materials for each
component of the
PFAS lifecycle
PFAS are used in many of our
consumer goods, such as food
packaging papers, cosmetics,
personal care products,
nonstick cookware, textiles,
furniture, stain repellant sprays
and cleaning products.
Quantitation of per- and
polyfluoroalkyl substances
(PFAS) in textiles
This technical note describes the
analysis of per- and polyfluoroalkyl
substances (PFAS) in textiles
using the SCIEX 6500+ system.
Leveraging high-resolution
mass spectrometry (HRMS) for
PFAS quantitation and resolving
interferences in food matrices
This technical note describes
a LC-MS/MS method for the
simultaneous quantitation and
identification of PFAS in food on
the ZenoTOF 7600 system.
Holly Lee1 and Craig M. Butt2
1SCIEX, Canada; 2SCIEX, USA
This technical note describes an LC-HRMS method for the
simultaneous quantitation and identification of PFAS in food
using the ZenoTOF 7600 system. The selectivity from HRMS
acquisition mass-resolved PFAS from their interferences,
resulting in more confident compound confirmation in complex
food matrices (Figure 1). Matrix spikes demonstrated acceptable
method performance for most analytes at target LOQs set by
food testing authorities and below the regulated maximum
residue limits (MRLs). The instrument sensitivity from
ZenoMRMHR acquisition also enabled a small injection volume of
3 µL and solvent-based calibration to minimize matrix effects,
while still achieving sub-ppb limits of quantitation (LOQs).
Key benefits of the ZenoTOF 7600 system for
analyzing PFAS in food matrices
• Mass-resolving matrix interferences: HRMS selectivity enabled
more confident PFAS detection by mass-resolving co-eluting
interferences in food matrices.
• Matrix recoveries meeting target criteria: >85% of the
analyte/matrix combinations tested met the recovery and
repeatability performance requirements established by food
testing authorities
• Leveraging ZenoMRMHR sensitivity for quantitation: Reduced
matrix effects from smaller injections enabled the use of
solvent-based calibration, while achieving sub-ppb LOQs for
quantitation.
Leveraging high-resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS) for
resolving PFAS interferences and quantitation in food matrices
Figure 1. The power of high-resolution mass spectrometry for removing matrix interferences in food. Comparison of representative extracted ion chromatograms
(XICs) acquired on a nominal (top) and accurate (bottom) mass spectrometer demonstrates how the higher selectivity from the latter can be used to significantly
improve the detection of PFBA and PFPeA by removing co-eluting matrix interferences in a 0.15 µg/kg corn snaplage spiked extract.
Sabarinathan1, Sashank Pillai1, Craig M. Butt2
1SCIEX, India; 2SCIEX, USA
This technical note describes the analysis of per- and
polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in textiles using the SCIEX
6500+ system. In-sample equivalent limits of quantitation
(LOQs) ranged between 25 pg/g and 125 pg/g except for PFBA
(5000 pg/g) and NFDHA (1250 pg/g). Matrix spikes were
performed at 0.25, 5 and 25 ng/g using a cotton shirt that did
not contain background PFAS levels, Overall, the matrix spikes
showed excellent recovery (95.4–131%) and precision (%CV 3.1–
28%) at the 0.25 ng/g spiking level. The method was applied to
four locally purchased clothing pieces. PFPeA, PFHxA, 4:2 FTS,
and 6:2 FTS were detected in the clothing at low ng/g levels.
Key benefits of the SCIEX 6500+ system for PFAS
quantitation in textiles
• Mid-range pg/g sensitivity using the SCIEX 6500+ system:
In-sample equivalent LOQs ranged from 25 to 125 pg/g for all
target PFAS, except for PFBA (5000 pg/g) and NFDHA (1250
pg/g).
• Good quantitative performance in matrix spikes: Matrix
spikes at 5 and 25 ng/g demonstrated recoveries of 100±10%
and precision %CV <10%. The 0.25 ng/g spike showed
accuracy from 95% to 131% and precision %CV <28%.
• Method applicability in purchased clothing: Low ng/g levels
of PFPeA, PFHxA, 4:2 FTS, and 6:2 FTS were detected.
Quantitation of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in
textiles
Figure 1. Extracted ion chromatograms (XICs) of PFPeA, PFHxA, 4:2 FTS and 6:2 FTS detected in clothing sample #1.
Characterizing PFAS in cosmetic
products using non-target acquisition
and Molecule Profiler software.
This technical note outlines the analysis
of PFAS in cosmetics using non-targeted
acquisition (NTA) with compound
identification through suspect screening
and diagnostic fragment ion confirmation.
Achieving exceptional
robustness for PFAS analysis in
food with the next-generation
SCIEX 7500+ system
This technical note demonstrates
>2x robustness improvement for
the analysis of PFAS food extracts
on the SCIEX 7500+ system.
Quantitation of per- and polyfluoroalkyl
substances (PFAS) in foodstuffs
This technical note describes a simple
and sensitive method using the SCIEX
7500 system for the quantitation of
per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances
(PFAS) in different foodstuffs.
1
Craig M. Butt1, Mikyanny Reyes1, Holly Lee2, Keegan Harris3 and
Amy Rand3
1SCIEX, USA; 2SCIEX, Canada; 3Carleton University, Canada
This technical note outlines the analysis of PFAS in cosmetics
using non-targeted acquisition (NTA) with compound
identification through suspect screening and diagnostic
fragment ion confirmation (Figure 1). The ZenoTOF 7600 system
used data-dependent acquisition (DDA) to obtain TOFMS
precursor and TOFMSMS fragmentation spectra. SCIEX OS
software was used for initial compound identification through
library matching suspect analytes with the SCIEX
Fluorochemical HR-MS/MS Spectral Library. Additional manual
screening showed the presence of several PAPs-like
compounds, known ingredients in certain cosmetic products.
The Molecule Profiler software was employed to rapidly find
precursor compounds that shared a diagnostic PAPs fragment
ion, reducing the time to detect structurally similar novel PFAS
in the cosmetics samples.
Key benefits of PFAS characterization in
cosmetics using the ZenoTOF 7600 system
• Rapid filtering of non-targeted acquisition results for
positive detections. SCIEX OS qualitative rules (“traffic
lights”) are used to quickly identify PFAS detections
• Improved confidence in PFAS identification through MS/MS
library matching. SCIEX Fluorochemical HR-MS/MS Spectral
Library was used to confirm identification by comparison to
the library database
• Detection of novel PFAS compounds through diagnostic
fragment ion screening in Molecule Profiler. Rapid screening
of non-targeted data sets to discover new PFAS
Characterizing PFAS in cosmetic products using non-targeted
acquisition and Molecule Profiler software
Figure 1. Instrumental and data processing workflow for the characterization of PFAS in cosmetics.
Holly Lee, Ian Moore, Craig M. Butt and Elliott Jones
SCIEX, Canada; SCIEX, USA
This technical note demonstrates >2x robustness improvement
for the analysis of PFAS food extracts on the SCIEX 7500+ system.
At the end of the study, comprising over 6400 food matrix
injections, the majority of PFAS compounds (10 out 13)
maintained >70% of the initial sensitivity. Residue analysis in
food matrices is challenged by the presence of interfering coextractables which can result in instrument contamination and
system downtime. Here, the robustness of the SCIEX 7500+
system and SCIEX 7500 system was evaluated in an accelerated
manner through an aggressive sample preparation procedure
and by omitting the diverter valve. The SCIEX 7500+ system
features new Mass Guard technology1 designed to improve
instrument robustness while maintaining optimal sensitivity
longer.
Key benefits of high-throughput PFAS analysis in
food using the SCIEX 7500+ system
• Enhanced robustness from Mass Guard technology: Improved
hardware components to reduce downstream instrument
contamination, maintaining instrument uptime
• Exceptional instrument stability: The SCIEX 7500+ system
achieved >2x improvement in robustness, as demonstrated by
>6400 injections of food matrices, compared to >3000
injections on the SCIEX 7500 system
• User-accessibility via an extractable DJet+ assembly:
Increased flexibility for user cleaning when required
Achieving exceptional robustness for PFAS analysis in food with the
next-generation SCIEX 7500+ system
Figure 1. Raw peak areas normalized to initial response (A) and internal standard (IS)-corrected peak area ratios (B) for perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) in
solvent quality control (QC) samples on the SCIEX 7500 (blue) and on the SCIEX 7500+ (green) systems. Each datapoint represents the mean with standard
error bars. In panel A, the dotted lines represent the 100% and 50% raw peak areas relative to the initial response. Robustness was compared based on the
total number of injections before the instrument sensitivity declined to 50% of the maxima. In panel B, the dotted lines represent the overall mean and %CV
for each experiment. Food extracts were injected between each solvent QC datapoint.
1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
0.25
1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
IS-corrected area ratio
PFOS 1
Normalized raw peak areas
Injections
1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
0.25
1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
IS-corrected area ratio
PFOS 1
Normalized raw peak areas
Injections
3054 matrix injections on 7500
6480 matrix injections on 7500+
A B
8.0 %CV
11 %CV
SCIEX 7500+ system
SCIEX 7500 system F
F F
F F
F F
F F
F F
F F
F F
F F
SO3H
Injections
p 1
For research use only. Not for use in diagnostics procedures.
Quantitation of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS)
in foodstuffs
Michael Scherer1, Jessica Smith2, Jack Steed2, Daniel McMillan2, Jianru Stahl-Zeng1
1SCIEX, Germany; 2SCIEX, UK
This technical note describes a simple and sensitive method
using the SCIEX 7500 system for the quantitation of per- and
polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in different foodstuffs. The
method is in response to the new maximum residue levels
(MRLs) outlined in the Commission Regulation (EU) 2022/2388
of 7 December 2022.1 The high sensitivity of the SCIEX 7500
system2 enabled the development of an LC-MS/MS method that
requires only a 2 µL food extract injection volume, while still
achieving good quantitative performance in the sub µg/kg range.
Application of this method to the analysis of pork liver, honey and
egg extracts provided by Fera Science Ltd. resulted in excellent
agreement with the previously measured reference levels.
PFAS compounds can enter the food chain either through
environmental contamination or migration from food packaging.
Based on a risk assessment of PFAS contamination in food on
human health, the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA)
established a group tolerable weekly intake (TWI) of 4.4 ng/kg
body weight for the sum of PFOS, PFOA, PFNA and PFHxS. As
a result, MRLs and total limits of the four PFAS were set, to
regulate their presence in certain foodstuffs of animal origin as a
protective measure against dietary exposure.1 Due to the lack of
data for many foods, the Commission also recommended
continued PFAS monitoring in a broad range of foodstuffs to
assess the need for further regulatory actions.3
PFAS measurements in foods require low limits of quantitation
(LOQs),4 which necessitate robust analytical performance and
increased instrument sensitivity. Here, the sensitivity of the
SCIEX 7500 system was leveraged to allow small sample
injection volumes to reduce matrix interferences and to allow the
use of solvent-based calibration to simplify quantitation for a
wide variety of different food matrices.
Key features of PFAS analysis in foodstuffs
using the SCIEX 7500 system
• The sensitivity of the SCIEX 7500 system allowed for a
small injection volume of 2 µL to reduce matrix interferences
in food extracts, while still achieving sub µg/kg LOQs based
on signal-to-noise (S/N).
• Acceptable precision (%CV <15%), linearity (r2 >0.995) and
ion ratio tolerance (±30%) were achieved using the external
solvent-based standard calibration curve.
• Calculated concentrations for PFAS compounds in an EURL
proficiency test sample (pork liver) were found to be within
the satisfactory range (±2 z-score)
• Positive detection of PFAS was achieved in the unspiked
blank food extracts, although the levels were all below their
corresponding MRLs
Figure 1. Extracted ion chromatograms (XICs) of the 4 regulated PFAS compounds (PFOS, PFOA, PFNA and PFHxS) with their
concentrations measured in an unspiked pork liver extract. Using the SCIEX 7500 system, LOQs of 0.01 ng/mL were achieved for PFOS
and PFNA, and 0.02 ng/mL for PFHxS and PFOA, in diluent. This was based on an ion ratio tolerance of ±30% for the quantifier and qualifier
transitions and S/N >10. Because of the small injection volume of 2 µL, the reduction of matrix effects in food enabled the use of solvent-based
calibration to derive these low LOQs, which in turn allowed for positive detections of PFAS in even the unspiked food extracts.
PFOS PFOA PFNA PFHxS
1. Sample
preparation
2. Small volume
direct injection
3. Sensitive and
reproducible
quantitation
0.38 µg/kg 0.06 µg/kg 0.09 µg/kg <LOQ
Food and consumer goods
66 | sciex.com 67
The forever changing world of PFAS testing PFAS the global
headline maker:
regulations from
around the world
The PFAS lifecycle:
an overview
Industry
collaborations:
a customer
success story
Solutions
at every level
PFAS around the
world: regional focus
(MDM) and trends
On-demand:
customer
collaborations
Phenomenex:
your partner in
PFAS-testing
consumables
Addressing the
challenges of
PFAS testing
SCIEX OS software:
when software
compliments
hardware
After-sales,
service, and support:
for all your needs
Technical
materials for each
component of the
PFAS lifecycle
Human
exposure
Human exposure to PFAS
occurs through multiple
exposure pathways, including
the ingestion of contaminated
drinking water and food.
Inhalation of indoor air and
household dust, and dermal
uptake from cosmetics and
personal care products.
People & PFAS: Quantitation of
PFASs in human serum and blood
using volumetric absorptive
microsamplers (VAMS)
This technical note describes the
trace level analysis of per- and
polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS)
using only 60 µL of whole blood
collected with VAMS devices.
Analysis of per- and polyfluoroalkyl
substances (PFAS) in aqueous,
solid, biosolid and tissue samples
following EPA Method 1633.
This technical note demonstrates
the performance of EPA Method
1633 for the analysis 40 PFAS in
surface water, soil and fish tissue.
p 1
For research use only. Not for use in diagnostics procedures.
People and PFAS: Quantitation in human serum and blood
using volumetric absorptive microsampling (VAMS)
Courtney C. Carignan,1 Rachel A. Bauer,1 Andrew Patterson,2 Thep Phomsopha,2 Eric Redman,2 Heather M.
Stapleton3 and Christopher P. Higgins4
1Michigan State University, USA; 2Eurofins Environment Testing Northern California, USA; 3Duke University, USA;
4Colorado School of Mines, USA
This technical note describes the trace level analysis of per- and
polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) using only 60 µL of whole
blood collected with volumetric absorptive microsampling (VAMS)
devices (Figure 1). The sensitivity of the SCIEX 7500 system was
used to achieve serum detection limits ranging from 0.1 to 1.0
ng/mL, which are sufficient for PFAS biomonitoring in the general
population. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST)
SRM 1957 samples that were collected using different sampling
techniques were analyzed. These results demonstrated that
samples collected with the VAMS method can be analyzed
accurately and produce comparable results to samples collected
by traditional PFAS serum sampling techniques. The use of VAMS
for PFAS blood analysis overcomes many of the logistical
obstacles common for traditional methods, such as the need for a
trained phlebotomist for sample collection, sample storage and
shipping costs.
Key features of the method for PFAS analysis
of blood and serum samples
• Elevated sensitivity of the SCIEX 7500 system allowed for 100
pg/mL minimum detection levels, which are aligned with
concentrations that are relevant for human health
• Excellent recovery for both serum and VAMS sample
preparation approaches, with average recoveries of 88% and
99%, respectively
• The accuracy of the VAMS approach demonstrates an ability
to support large-scale PFAS biomonitoring programs
Figure 1. Graphical abstract (left) and comparison of PFOS content (right) in the method blank sample (MB, purple) and laboratory control
sample (LCS, green).
p 1
For research use only. Not for use in diagnostics procedures.
Analysis of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in
aqueous, solid, biosolid and tissue samples following EPA
Method 1633
Megumi Shimizu1, Craig M. Butt1, Matt Noestheden1, Karl A. Oetjen1, Sam Lodge2 and Phil Bassignani3
1SCIEX, USA; 2Phenomenex, USA; 3Alpha Analytical, Inc, USA
This technical note demonstrates the performance of EPA
Method 1633 for the analysis 40 PFAS in surface water, soil and
fish tissue. Using the SCIEX 5500+ system, initial demonstration
of capability (IDC) experiments yielded experimental method
detection limit (MDL) concentrations lower than the finalized,
pooled values for aqueous matrices. Method robustness was
demonstrated across 40 hours of extracted matrix and solvent
standard injections. Mean accuracy ranged from 88% to 111%
and the mean %CV was 4.9%. Further, the method achieved ~3
min resolution of TDCA from PFOS and PFHxS, which is a
critical requirement of EPA Method 1633. Finally, analysis of
sludge and soil standard reference materials (SRMs) showed
comparable concentrations to their certified values,
demonstrating good method accuracy.
EPA Method 1633 method is an isotope dilution method that is
comparable to drinking water PFAS methods (EPA Methods 533
and 537.1). In addition to the compounds in EPA Methods 533
and 537.1, EPA Method 1633 includes long chain perfluorinated
sulfonic acids (PFNS, PFDS, PFDoS), fluorooctanesulfonamides
(FOSAs), fluorooctanesulfonamidoethanols (FOSEs) and x:3,
fluorotelomer carboxylic acids (FTCAs). Unlike the previous EPA
PFAS methods, EPA Method 1633 requires monitoring 2
fragment ions for most analytes.
Key benefits of the analysis following EPA
Method 1633 on the SCIEX 5500+ system
• The observed limits of quantitation (LOQ) were 0.1x to 0.5x of
the EPA level 1 standard (Figure 1), except for PFOSA
• The method showed chromatographic separation of
taurodeoxycholic acid (TDCA) from PFOS (>2 min) and other
PFAS analytes
• The method showed excellent robustness across ~40 hours of
125 continuous injections of solvent standards and matrix
samples. The mean accuracy of the continuing calibration
verification (CCV) standard (n=10) was 98%.
• The accurate quantitation with real-world samples was
demonstrated using SRMs
Figure 1. LOQ chromatograms for representative PFAS compounds. In-vial LOQ concentrations were 0.1x to 0.5x lower than the level 1 EPA
standard, demonstrating the high sensitivity of the method. The chromatograms shown cover the diverse range of PFAS classes included in EPA
Method 1633.
68 | sciex.com 69
The forever changing world of PFAS testing PFAS the global
headline maker:
regulations from
around the world
The PFAS lifecycle:
an overview
Industry
collaborations:
a customer
success story
Solutions
at every level
PFAS around the
world: regional focus
(MDM) and trends
On-demand:
customer
collaborations
Phenomenex:
your partner in
PFAS-testing
consumables
Addressing the
challenges of
PFAS testing
SCIEX OS software:
when software
compliments
hardware
After-sales,
service, and support:
for all your needs
Technical
materials for each
component of the
PFAS lifecycle
11
Phenomenex:
your partner in PFAS
testing consumables70 | sciex.com 71
The forever changing world of PFAS testing PFAS the global
headline maker:
regulations from
around the world
The PFAS lifecycle:
an overview
Industry
collaborations:
a customer
success story
Solutions
at every level
PFAS around the
world: regional focus
(MDM) and trends
On-demand:
customer
collaborations
Phenomenex:
your partner in
PFAS-testing
consumables
Addressing the
challenges of
PFAS testing
SCIEX OS software:
when software
compliments
hardware
After-sales,
service, and support:
for all your needs
Technical
materials for each
component of the
PFAS lifecycle
Phenomenex: your
partner in PFAS
testing consumables
Our list of solutions include:
• Standardization and Calibration
• Sample preparation
• Analytical columns
• Testing Applications
• Complimentary full-time support from experts
Bringing robustness,
efficiency, and quality data
to your PFAS analysis
Phenomenex is our sister
company within Danaher that
provides high-quality and costeffective chromatography PFAS
analytical tools, PFAS testing
methods, and resources to
help you and your lab achieve
quality analysis in a wide
range of PFAS matrices.
New! “Designed for PFAS”
Complete product portfolio
Phenomenex now provides
new QC tested SPE plus a vast
selection of consumables
verified for PFAS analysis,
reduce potential risk of
false positives due to
background contamination.
To order PFAS products and learn more, visit
www.phenomenex.com/PFAS
Designed for PFAS
Complete product portfolio aiming to reduce
or eliminate background interferences
• PFAS QC tested SPE media
• Sub-components verified for the absence of PFAS
• Low background contamination
1501671696_DA0924_w_e1
The “Designed for PFAS” products offer
reproducibility and accuracy in detecting
and quantifying a broad range of PFAS
compounds. From sample preparation
to analysis, the “Designed for PFAS”
portfolio has shown to meet the most
stringent quality standards and maintain
data quality without having to worry
about background contamination.
Click on the tab to find out more.
72 | sciex.com 73
The forever changing world of PFAS testing PFAS the global
headline maker:
regulations from
around the world
The PFAS lifecycle:
an overview
Industry
collaborations:
a customer
success story
Solutions
at every level
PFAS around the
world: regional focus
(MDM) and trends
On-demand:
customer
collaborations
Phenomenex:
your partner in
PFAS-testing
consumables
Addressing the
challenges of
PFAS testing
SCIEX OS software:
when software
compliments
hardware
After-sales,
service, and support:
for all your needs
Technical
materials for each
component of the
PFAS lifecycle
Conclusion
Insustry experts, research leaders, internal
application scientists, we present PFASIndustry experts from all our collaborators with
different perspectives in the hope of enabling
the wider scientific community to find the
methodology and solution that fits their needs.
Here at SCIEX, we understand and empathize the challenges many
laboratories face when it comes to detecting and quantifying
this family of forever chemicals. Whether it is trace-level
detection at the parts-per-quadrillion level, the difference in
matrices and therefore sample preparation steps, or simply
the number of analytes needed to be included in the MRM list,
it can be daunting. We hope you enjoyed our presentation of
this eBook, and follow us online at our various channels to
get the updates on what the SCIEX team is researching.
For all the latest technical
materials and resources
Stay up to date and
join the conversion
The SCIEX clinical diagnostic portfolio is For In Vitro Diagnostic Use. Rx Only. Product(s) not available in all countries. For information on
availability, please contact your local sales representative or refer to https://sciex.com/diagnostics. All other products are For Research Use
Only. Not for use in Diagnostic Procedures. Trademarks and/or registered trademarks mentioned herein, including associated logos, are the property
of AB Sciex Pte. Ltd. or their respective owners in the United States and/or certain other countries. © 2025 DH Tech. Dev. Pte. Ltd MKT-30669-A
Headquarters
500 Old Connecticut Path, Framingham, MA 01701 USA
Phone 508-383-7700
sciex.com
International Sales
For our office locations please call the division
headquarters or refer to our website at
sciex.com/offices
Brought to you by
Download the eBook for FREE Now!
Information you provide will be shared with the sponsors for this content. Technology Networks or its sponsors may contact you to offer you content or products based on your interest in this topic. You may opt-out at any time.