We've updated our Privacy Policy to make it clearer how we use your personal data. We use cookies to provide you with a better experience. You can read our Cookie Policy here.

Advertisement

Active Ingredients in Sunscreen Detrimental to Freshwater Ecosystems

Active Ingredients in Sunscreen Detrimental to Freshwater Ecosystems content piece image
Water flea, Daphnia magna, rougly 5mm across. Study results show that exposure to UV-filters over a 48-hour period prevented the fleas from navigating through their environment. Exposure over a 14-day period--similar to what might occur near popular beach areas--proved lethal for the tiny crustaceans. Credit: Aaron Boyd.
Listen with
Speechify
0:00
Register for free to listen to this article
Thank you. Listen to this article using the player above.

Want to listen to this article for FREE?

Complete the form below to unlock access to ALL audio articles.

Read time: 1 minute

The active ingredients found in sunscreen have detrimental effects on freshwater ecosystems, according to new research by University of Alberta biologists.

The results show that long-term exposure to ultraviolet (UV) filters—including avobenzone, oxybenzone, and octocrylene—is lethal for some organisms living in freshwater environments. One of the largest sources of UV-filter contamination in both marine and freshwater environments is from sunscreen leaching off of the skin while swimming. 


“We do know that UV-filters are particularly devastating to coral reefs and cause bleaching, but there has been almost no research on what the effects are to freshwater animals,” explained Aaron Boyd, graduate student in the Department of Biological Sciences and lead author on the paper. “To address this, we examined the effects of UV-filters in the water flea, Daphnia magna.” 


The results show that exposure to UV-filters over a 48-hour period prevented the fleas from navigating through their environment. Exposure over a 14-day period—similar to what might occur near popular beach areas—proved lethal for the tiny crustaceans. 


“This is particularly bad for a freshwater ecosystem as a whole, as Daphnia are an important part of the food chain for many smaller species of fish,” added Boyd, who completed this research in collaboration with graduate student Connor Stewart, under the supervision of Assistant Professor Tamzin Blewett and Professor Keith Tierney. “Losing a Daphnia population would put all of the species that rely on them at risk of starvation, and in certain conditions could cause the local ecosystem to collapse.” 


The good news, Boyd explained, is that the fleas were able to recover their ability to navigate through the water once the contamination was removed—a good sign for environmental recovery. “These chemicals are short-lived in the environment, so if we remove the sources of pollution, then there is a reasonable chance for the organisms in those environments to recover,” he said. 


Further research is required to better understand the long-term impact of UV-filters—and research continues in the search for non-toxic UV filters.

Reference
Boyd A, Stewart CB, Philibert DA, et al. A burning issue: The effect of organic ultraviolet filter exposure on the behaviour and physiology of Daphnia magna. Science of The Total Environment. 2021;750:141707. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141707

This article has been republished from the following materials. Note: material may have been edited for length and content. For further information, please contact the cited source.