Femur Offers Better Measure of Age at Death
News Jan 26, 2018 | Original Story by Ann Ross for North Carolina State University.

Credit: Matt Shipman.
Forensic researchers at North Carolina State University have found a more accurate way to assess an individual’s age at death, based on the bone mineral density of the femur. The technique could be used to help identify human remains.
“Current techniques for assessing an individual’s age at death rely on reviewing the wear and tear on a skeleton’s joint surfaces,” says Ann Ross, a professor of biological sciences at NC State and corresponding author of a paper on the work. “But there is a lot of variability there, based on an individual’s lifestyle and how a forensic practitioner interprets those skeletal features. Depending on the method being used, current approaches could list a deceased individual in his or her 40s as being anywhere from 27 to 70 years old.
“However, bone mineral content and density increase as we grow, then decline at a fairly steady rate once we reach adulthood – making it a potentially useful way of assessing age,” Ross says.
While using bone mineral density to assess age is a concept that’s been around for several years, the NC State team has found a way to fine-tune the practice.
Specifically, the researchers found that assessing bone mineral density at the neck of the femur provided the best sampling data for determining age.
In a study assessing the remains of 33 men and eight women, the researchers found that bone mineral density could be used to determine age within a 13-year margin of error.
“This, in itself, is a step in the right direction,” Ross says. “But we think the method could be made even more accurate if we were able to significantly increase the sample size, including more women and more representatives from each age group.”
The researchers found no significant difference between men and women based on the bone mineral density of the femur. However, they did find difference between sexes in the density of the skull.
The researchers think the skull is better for assessing sex because it’s not a load-bearing bone, meaning it is subject to fewer outside forces – allowing forensic practitioners to detect bone mineral density differences that result from an individual’s biological sex.
“However, while promising, we didn’t have a large enough sample size to draw firm conclusions about using bone mineral density to determine sex – that would require a larger study,” Ross says.
This article has been republished from materials provided by North Carolina State University. Note: material may have been edited for length and content. For further information, please contact the cited source.
Reference
Anna Paschall, Ann H. Ross. Biological sex variation in bone mineral density in the cranium and femur. Science & Justice, 2018; DOI: 10.1016/j.scijus.2018.01.002.
RELATED ARTICLES
A New Listeria Species From Costa Rica
NewsListeria costaricensis is the official name given to the new bacterial species, discovered in an industrial drainage area in the Costa Rican province of Alajuela.
READ MORERapid Removal of Arsenic From Drinking Water...By Moss!
NewsA moss capable of removing arsenic from contaminated water has been discovered by researchers. And it happens quickly – in just one hour, the arsenic level is so low that the water is no longer harmful for people to drink.
READ MORENew Microscope Captures Detailed 3-D Movies of Cells Deep Within Living Systems
NewsMerging lattice light sheet microscopy with adaptive optics reveals the most detailed picture yet of subcellular dynamics in multicellular organisms.
READ MOREComments | 0 ADD COMMENT
Like what you just read? You can find similar content on the communities below.
Analysis & SeparationsTo personalize the content you see on Technology Networks homepage, Log In or Subscribe for Free
LOGIN SUBSCRIBE FOR FREE
Login
You must be logged in to post a comment.