We've updated our Privacy Policy to make it clearer how we use your personal data.

We use cookies to provide you with a better experience. You can read our Cookie Policy here.

Advertisement
French Ban on Food Additive May Be Premature
News

French Ban on Food Additive May Be Premature

French Ban on Food Additive May Be Premature
News

French Ban on Food Additive May Be Premature

Credit: Pixabay.
Read time:
 

Want a FREE PDF version of This News Story?

Complete the form below and we will email you a PDF version of "French Ban on Food Additive May Be Premature"

First Name*
Last Name*
Email Address*
Country*
Company Type*
Job Function*
Would you like to receive further email communication from Technology Networks?

Technology Networks Ltd. needs the contact information you provide to us to contact you about our products and services. You may unsubscribe from these communications at any time. For information on how to unsubscribe, as well as our privacy practices and commitment to protecting your privacy, check out our Privacy Policy

Michigan State University and University of Nebraska Medical Center researchers are refuting an earlier French government-funded study that claims titanium dioxide, a common food additive used worldwide, causes digestive inflammation and lesions in rats.

Results of the French study have led leaders of the country to prohibit all food products with the additive from being placed on the market starting January 2020. France’s ban could have implications for other countries, including the United States.


Food-grade titanium dioxide, or E171, is a naturally occurring mineral used as a whitener and brightener in foods and medications. A lower-grade version of E171 is also found in cosmetics and sunscreen.


The MSU research, published in Food and Chemical Toxicology, found significant flaws in the French study and more importantly, found no evidence of negative health effects after replicating and correcting testing methods used in the previous research.


One primary flaw was the French scientists didn’t test the rats based on how humans usually are exposed to the food additive.


“We designed our study to investigate E171 exposure through food, the most common way people consume the ingredient,” said Norbert Kaminski, lead author and director of MSU’s Center for Research on Ingredient Safety. “By focusing on real-life exposure, our study provides much needed context and nuance to the food safety conversation.”


According to Kaminski and co-investigator Sam Cohen from UNMC, the French researchers administered E171 in the rat’s drinking water. Since the additive doesn’t dissolve in water, it would be like drinking water with sand in it.


“This type of exposure in humans just isn’t relevant because of its insolubility,” Kaminski said.


The researchers also mentioned that other studies have tested the substance through inhalation and direct injection, which also are uncommon ways people are exposed to the food additive.


While the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and the European Food Safety Authority recognize the ingredient as safe, E171 has come under intense scrutiny by France because of these previous studies.


Another oversight noted by Kaminski and Cohen was that the rats were pretreated with the chemical dimethylhydrazine, or DMH, prior to E171 exposure.


“The problem is there were no experimental control groups in the French study that looked at just the effects of DMH,” Kaminski said.


DMH is a potent genotoxicant, which can alter DNA, and is why the lesions and inflammation occurred, according to Kaminski and the research team.


To remove any possibility of experimental bias and offset any criticism related to the MSU and UNMC study – some funding was obtained through industry partners – the research was conducted in a blinded manner over a seven-day and 100-day period. This means that no one on the investigative team knew which rats were exposed to E171 and which tissues came from the subjects until the analysis of all samples was completed.


“It was important that the study was conducted this way and went through a rigorous peer-review process to take away any doubts,” Kaminski said.


While much of the research was funded by MSU, it partially was funded by the Grocery Manufacturers Association, the Titanium Dioxide Manufacturers Association and the International Association of Color Manufacturers.


Currently, Kaminski has no plans to study the additive further, yet he did mention other studies are being conducted to continue to address the E171 food safety conversation.

Reference
Evaluation of immunologic and intestinal effects in rats administered an E 171-containing diet, a food grade titanium dioxide (TiO2). Lance K.Blevins et al. Food and Chemical Toxicology, Volume 133, November 2019, 110793, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2019.110793.


This article has been republished from the following materials. Note: material may have been edited for length and content. For further information, please contact the cited source.

Advertisement