We've updated our Privacy Policy to make it clearer how we use your personal data.

We use cookies to provide you with a better experience. You can read our Cookie Policy here.

Advertisement
G20 'Neither Revealing Nor Removing' Fossil Fuel Subsidies
News

G20 'Neither Revealing Nor Removing' Fossil Fuel Subsidies

G20 'Neither Revealing Nor Removing' Fossil Fuel Subsidies
News

G20 'Neither Revealing Nor Removing' Fossil Fuel Subsidies

Read time:
 

Want a FREE PDF version of This News Story?

Complete the form below and we will email you a PDF version of "G20 'Neither Revealing Nor Removing' Fossil Fuel Subsidies"

First Name*
Last Name*
Email Address*
Country*
Company Type*
Job Function*
Would you like to receive further email communication from Technology Networks?

Technology Networks Ltd. needs the contact information you provide to us to contact you about our products and services. You may unsubscribe from these communications at any time. For information on how to unsubscribe, as well as our privacy practices and commitment to protecting your privacy, check out our Privacy Policy

Oil Change International and Earth Track jointly prepared the report, entitled "G20 Fossil-Fuel Subsidy Phase Out: A review of current gaps and needed changes to achieve success". In Pittsburgh in September 2009, G20 leaders pledged to "rationalize and phase out over the medium term inefficient fossil fuel subsidies that encourage wasteful consumption."

Reports and country submissions documenting G20 progress were released publicly in August 2010. Oil Change International and Earth Track examined and evaluated these public documents to conduct the study.

"The G20 is neither revealing nor removing fossil fuel subsidies," said Steve Kretzmann of Oil Change International. "Each G20 country has defined 'inefficient fossil fuel subsidy' as they like, reported on what they want, and then listed either no subsidies, or things that they had already said they were doing."

"There is no accountability, no oversight and review, no actual mechanism to hold these leaders to their words. Some of the analysis coming out of the OECD and IEA is quite helpful, but so far, in the process itself, there's just no action behind the words of the G20," said Kretzmann.

The report evaluates the quality of the reporting on subsidies by comparing G20 data with other available sets of data on subsidies. It also analyzes the reasons given for excluding subsidies from phase out and provides recommendations for ways forward on subsidy reform with the G20, or another institution such as the World Trade Organization or the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change.

Download the report here
Advertisement