We've updated our Privacy Policy to make it clearer how we use your personal data. We use cookies to provide you with a better experience. You can read our Cookie Policy here.

Advertisement

If We Go Carbon Neutral Can We Still Have Fun?

Listen with
Speechify
0:00
Register for free to listen to this article
Thank you. Listen to this article using the player above.

Want to listen to this article for FREE?

Complete the form below to unlock access to ALL audio articles.

Read time: 1 minute

Will Britain going carbon neutral mean no more fun? Experts from the University of Surrey have urged local policy makers to put in place infrastructure that will enable people to enjoy recreation and leisure while keeping their carbon footprint down.

Mainstream strategies generally address the challenge of reducing carbon by reviewing consumption, but a complementary approach looks at how people spend their time.

Researchers from Surrey believe that policy-making from a time-use perspective provides facilities for people to be happy while causing less damage to the environment.


A paper published by the Journal of Public Mental Health examines the carbon footprint associated with different types of leisure activities. Researchers found pastimes that generally bring the most gratification involve physical and mental activity as well as socialising, which contributes to personal growth.


By combining information from studies on happiness with those on low carbon lifestyles, researchers found that the ideal activities for both happiness and carbon reduction include goal orientated pastimes such as playing a sport, as well as reading challenging books, singing in a choir and spending time at home with friends and family.


“But many of these activities can be done in low carbon or high carbon ways,” warned Angela Druckman, Professor of Sustainable Consumption and Production at the University of Surrey. “For example, as ambitions in competitive activities rise, people may fly abroad to take part in competitions.”


“We need a two-pronged approach,” explained co-author Dr Birgitta Gatersleben, Reader in Environmental Psychology. “We know that long distance travel should be discouraged and this is tricky due to its international nature. However, it’s easier to make progress at a local level. We need to support investment in local infrastructure, such as sports and community centres, and also provide facilities for safer cycling and walking to support more sustainable local travel.”


“In this way we can make progress towards a carbon neutral UK whilst also maximising happiness,” concluded Druckman.

Reference
Angela Druckman, Birgitta Gatersleben, (2019) "A time-use approach: high subjective wellbeing, low carbon leisure", Journal of Public Mental Health, https://doi.org/10.1108/JPMH-04-2018-0024.


This article has been republished from the following materials. Note: material may have been edited for length and content. For further information, please contact the cited source.