We've updated our Privacy Policy to make it clearer how we use your personal data.

We use cookies to provide you with a better experience. You can read our Cookie Policy here.

Pesticide Tests Look at Impact of Non-lethal Doses

Pesticide Tests Look at Impact of Non-lethal Doses

Pesticide Tests Look at Impact of Non-lethal Doses

Pesticide Tests Look at Impact of Non-lethal Doses

Credit: Pixabay.
Read time:

Want a FREE PDF version of This News Story?

Complete the form below and we will email you a PDF version of "Pesticide Tests Look at Impact of Non-lethal Doses"

First Name*
Last Name*
Email Address*
Company Type*
Job Function*
Would you like to receive further email communication from Technology Networks?

Technology Networks Ltd. needs the contact information you provide to us to contact you about our products and services. You may unsubscribe from these communications at any time. For information on how to unsubscribe, as well as our privacy practices and commitment to protecting your privacy, check out our Privacy Policy

USask biology professor Jack Gray’s research on locusts, published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS), may have implications for understanding the link between these pesticides and mortality in other species such as the “colony collapse disorder” responsible for the deaths of millions of bees worldwide.

“There is controversy over neonicotinoid pesticides,” said Gray. “Their development suggested they were safer than other pesticides, but it is more complicated because their effects at non-lethal doses on insects and other species needed to be investigated further.”

From his previous studies with locusts, Gray designed a virtual flight simulator in which he tested how non-lethal doses of pesticides can affect the insects’ ability to visually detect moving objects such as trees and predators. He and his team found that the newer sulfoxamine pesticide, sulfoxaflor (SFX), does not impair the insects’ motion detection ability, while the current neonicotinoid imidacloprid (IMD) does.

“Even though this suggests that SFX isn’t as toxic as the other pesticide at low dosages, more testing is needed to establish whether it a safer, preferable option for agriculture use,” said Gray.

Gray and his team used an approach that looks at behaviour and neurophysiology, which have seldom been applied together for studying pesticide effects. The results confirmed that IMD had negative effects on the locusts’ ability to jump and escape dangers, while SFX did not. A potential explanation may be that SFX does not bind as strongly to the same receptor that determines the insects’ sensitivity to the pesticides.    

The USask team chose locusts because their nervous system is well-studied, and the neurons that regulate their motion detection are common to a variety of other species including birds, and likely even humans.

“These findings may be applicable to other species to understand how these pesticides affect how fast the nervous system can send information,” said Gray.   

By using small electrodes in the insect’s thorax, former USask PhD student Rachel Parkinson—first author of the paper—measured the electrical signals directly from a neuron in the insect’s nervous system that detects visual motion and controls flight.  

“The reaction time of locusts treated with the IMD pesticide slows down, impairing their ability to avoid objects,” said Parkinson, now post-doctoral fellow at the University of Oxford.

Neonicotinoid and sulfoximine pesticides differentially impair insect escape behavior and motion detection. Rachel H. Parkinson,  Sinan Zhang, and John R. Gray. PNAS,  February 24, 2020 https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1916432117.

This article has been republished from the following materials. Note: material may have been edited for length and content. For further information, please contact the cited source.