We've updated our Privacy Policy to make it clearer how we use your personal data.

We use cookies to provide you with a better experience. You can read our Cookie Policy here.

Advertisement
Prioritizing Air Pollution Control in China
News

Prioritizing Air Pollution Control in China

Prioritizing Air Pollution Control in China
News

Prioritizing Air Pollution Control in China

Read time:
 

Want a FREE PDF version of This News Story?

Complete the form below and we will email you a PDF version of "Prioritizing Air Pollution Control in China"

First Name*
Last Name*
Email Address*
Country*
Company Type*
Job Function*
Would you like to receive further email communication from Technology Networks?

Technology Networks Ltd. needs the contact information you provide to us to contact you about our products and services. You may unsubscribe from these communications at any time. For information on how to unsubscribe, as well as our privacy practices and commitment to protecting your privacy, check out our Privacy Policy

The study is believed to be one of the first risk assessments of a developing country using the Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) modeling system. Although CMAQ is widely used in the United States, most developing countries lack the exhaustive data on emissions, pollutant monitoring, and weather conditions needed to make accurate predictions. The research team capitalized on emissions data from China that NASA estimated using satellite measurements during a 2006 study of intercontinental pollution drift.

The researchers examined emissions of sulfur dioxide (SO2), nitrogen oxides (NOx), volatile organic compounds (VOCs), and PM2.5, focusing on the effect of these pollutants on PM2.5 and ozone concentrations. Ozone is a gas formed when NOx and VOCs in the atmosphere react in sunlight. PM2.5 is linked to heart and respiratory disease, with resulting effects on premature death, and ozone has been associated with respiratory outcomes and premature death. They considered 10 control scenarios among major pollution sources—industry, power plants, motor vehicles, and domestic life—and focused on the health benefits per ton-of-emission reduction across scenarios.

Computer modeling predicted the greatest decline in mortality would come from reducing SO2 emissions from power plants and PM2.5 emissions from industry, with each technology preventing approximately 1,200–24,000 deaths per year among the more than 80 million people living in the delta. This is based on the significant reduction in SO2 emissions from coal-powered plants with the use of fluidized gas desulfurization, as well as the large health benefit per ton of avoided emissions of primary PM2.5 from industry. Measures to reduce NOx and VOCs, including tighter vehicle-emissions standards, would have less impact on public health.

The authors point out that understanding sectoral differences in the ways emission-control strategies affect exposures and health risks can help guide strategies that are both economically and environmentally optimal. They conclude that their findings provide the basis for prioritizing pollution-control strategies in the Yangtze River Delta and provide a template for comparable analyses elsewhere.

Reproduced with permission from Environmental Health Perspectives. Original article can be found on the EHP website.

Advertisement