Transform Process Development Efficiency With Single-Use Bioreactors
App Note / Case Study
Published: September 23, 2025
Credit: Thermo Fisher Scientific
Bioprocessing is evolving rapidly, and traditional glass bioreactors struggle to keep pace with demands for speed, scalability and sustainability. Cleaning and sterilization add delays, while risks of contamination remain high.
A shift is needed toward solutions that streamline workflows and improve consistency.
This application note explores how an advanced 5 L single-use bioreactor enhances productivity, reduces costs and enables scalability from bench to production.
Download this application note to explore:
- How faster turnaround times drive 27% higher productivity
- Why scalable design supports efficient transition to large-scale systems
- Ways to reduce environmental impact and operational costs
Advancing process development with the 5 L DynaDrive
Single-Use Bioreactor: a paradigm shift from glass
benchtop bioreactors
Process development
Technical note | 5 L DynaDrive Single-Use Bioreactor
Introduction
The 5 L Thermo Scientific™ DynaDrive™ Single-Use Bioreactor (S.U.B.) is a transformative
solution for process development laboratories that offers significant advantages over
traditional glass bioreactors. The Thermo Scientific™ DynaDrive™ BioProcess Container
(BPC) for the 5 L DynaDrive S.U.B. is factory-sterilized, which reduces the risk of
contamination and eliminates the need for labor-intensive cleaning and sterilization.
Eliminating these steps can reduce the duration of the process development workflow
by 20% and increase productivity by as much as 27%, enabling higher productivity
with less environmental impact than a glass bioreactor. The 5 L DynaDrive S.U.B.
also has a scalable design to enable an easy transition from benchtop to large-scale
production, making it a cost-effective and environmentally friendly choice for modern
bioprocessing needs.
Keywords
Benchtop bioreactor, process
development, single-use bioreactor
Table 1. Comparison of the 5 L DynaDrive S.U.B. and glass bioreactors.
Area of focus Benefits of the 5 L DynaDrive S.U.B. Benefits of glass bioreactors
Performance and scalability
• Low risk of cross-contamination
• High mass-transfer efficiency
• Consistent design that streamlines scale-up from
the benchtop to large-scale, single-use equipment
• High turndown ratio that provides flexibility to run
different batch sizes
• Better suited for continuous production
Operational efficiency
• No autoclaving required
• Factory-sterilized consumables that enable rapid
setup and turnaround
• Reusable
• Robust and durable
Capital investment and cost
of operation
• Low up-front capital expenditure (CapEx), with no
need for glassware washers or autoclaves
• Low recurring costs for consumables
(OpEx) due to reusability
Sustainability • Lower water and energy consumption with
factory-sterilized BPC
• Comparatively small consumablesrelated carbon footprint
Benchtop bioreactors play a crucial role in the development and
optimization of new bioprocesses by academic and industrial
researchers. Glass benchtop bioreactors have historically been
the standard for cell cultivation and small-scale experiments.
However, glass bioreactors require labor-intensive cleaning and
sterilization because they are susceptible to contamination, and
the associated operating costs are high.
In recent years, the biopharmaceutical industry has shifted
toward using single-use bioreactors in a drive to find more
efficient, scalable, and cost-effective production solutions [1,2].
Single-use bioreactors have factory-sterilized, disposable
components that help minimize the risk of contamination
and reduce downtime in the production phase. However, the
availability of bench-scale single-use bioreactors has been
limited. The 5 L DynaDrive S.U.B. is a benchtop bioreactor that
offers process development laboratories several advantages
over reusable glass bioreactors, including efficient turnaround,
cost‑effectiveness, and sustainability (Table 1).
Performance and scalability
The 5 L DynaDrive S.U.B. has significant advantages over
glass bioreactors in terms of performance and scalability. The
proprietary drilled-hole sparger and novel drivetrain are designed
for high mass-transfer efficiency to support high-density cell
cultures, making the 5 L DynaDrive S.U.B. suitable for both
fed-batch and perfusion processes. When used with Gibco™ cell
culture media and supplements, the 5 L DynaDrive S.U.B. can
significantly improve cell culture performance and consistency in
process development [3,4].
Ergonomically friendly components like the front-loading BPC
and aseptic connectors facilitate installation and further minimize
the risk of contamination. The cubic design of the 5 L DynaDrive
S.U.B., which mirrors the cubic design of the 500 L and 5,000 L
DynaDrive S.U.B.s, gives it a more compact facility footprint than
a cylindrical glass bioreactor.
Lack of scalability is a key challenge with traditional glass
bioreactors. The 5 L DynaDrive S.U.B. has a turndown ratio
of 5:1, which allows scaling of experiments from 1 L to 5 L
without replacing the vessel. The 5 L DynaDrive S.U.B. can also
enable an easy transition from benchtop to production‑scale
operation because its design is similar to that of 500 L and
5,000 L DynaDrive S.U.B.s, which have turndown ratios of 10:1
and higher. This versatility and scalability can help process
development laboratories optimize operations and prepare for
large-scale production, ultimately improving overall scalability.
2 thermofisher.com/dynadrive
Operational efficiency
Even with proper cleaning and sterilization, the contamination rates for reusable
bioreactors can be as high as 17% [5]. The 5 L DynaDrive S.U.B. uses a
factory‑sterilized BPC made with high-quality Thermo Scientific™ Aegis™ 5-14
film, and setting up the 5 L DynaDrive S.U.B. with the BPC takes approximately
5 minutes. The 5 L DynaDrive S.U.B. can thus mitigate contamination risks
and help maximize operational efficiency during process development.
Figure 1 shows a typical timeline for process development with glass bioreactors.
With the 5 L DynaDrive S.U.B., a laboratory can save up to 8 days by eliminating the
pressure testing, assembly, and autoclaving steps that would be required with glass
bioreactors (Figure 2). The time saved typically translates to a 20% reduction in workflow
duration, allowing more experiments to be completed in the same time frame. Up to 141
experiments can be completed per year with the 5 L DynaDrive S.U.B., compared to 111
experiments with a glass bioreactor, representing a 27% increase in productivity.
Jan | Feb
39 days 8 x glass bioreactor
2 days
1 day
2 days
1 day
1 day
1 day
14 days
1 day
1 day
1 day
7 days
7 days Planning
Headplate build
Solution prep
Assembly and pressure testing
Autoclaving
Pressure testing
Setup and fill
Cell culture
Harvest and final data collection
Disassembly and enzymatic cleaning
Dish washer
Data analysis
Figure 1. Experimental timeline with a glass bioreactor.
Jan
31 days 8 x 5 L DynaDrive S.U.B.
1 day
1 day
14 days
1 day
7 days
7 days Planning
Solution prep
Setup and fill
Cell culture
Harvest and final data collection
Data analysis
Figure 2. Experimental timeline with the 5 L DynaDrive S.U.B.
3 thermofisher.com/dynadrive
Capital investment and cost of operation
When the capital investment and operational costs associated
with glass bioreactors are considered, the 5 L DynaDrive S.U.B.
has clear advantages. The initial investment in a glass bioreactor
is not limited to the cost of the bioreactor. It also includes the
cost of associated equipment (i.e., an autoclave and glassware
washer). The 5 L DynaDrive S.U.B. eliminates the need for
autoclaves and glassware washers, allowing significant savings
in initial CapEx. It would cost approximately 20% more to equip
a high‑throughput process development laboratory with 100
glass bioreactors than it would to equip it with 100 5 L DynaDrive
S.U.B.s, including the controllers (Figure 3).
Although the 5 L DynaDrive S.U.B. requires the recurring
purchase of consumables, it is less expensive to operate than a
glass bioreactor when the cost of operating and maintaining the
associated equipment is factored in (Figure 4). It is thus more
efficient and cost-effective for large-scale process development
facilities to switch from reusable glass bioreactors to single-use
technologies (SUTs) like the 5 L DynaDrive S.U.B.
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120%
140%
Benchtop glass bioreactor Benchtop DynaDrive S.U.B.
Relative capital cost
Bioreactor stations Supporting equipment
Figure 3. Capital cost of benchtop glass bioreactors relative to the
5 L DynaDrive S.U.B.
Sustainability
Incorporating the 5 L DynaDrive S.U.B. into the process
development workflow can significantly reduce water and
energy consumption and eliminate the need for harsh cleaning
agents, making it a more environmentally sustainable option
than a glass bioreactor. Autoclaving four or more bioreactors
requires 250–300 L of water per sterilization cycle, and a
laboratory glassware washer consumes 55–65 L per wash
cycle [6,7]. This means 61,000 to 73,000 L of water would be
required annually to sterilize and clean glass bioreactors in a
laboratory that operates an autoclave and washer 200 times
per year. In contrast, the 5 L DynaDrive S.U.B. does not
require cleaning or sterilization, thereby reducing the significant
environmental impact of process development.
Customers can also opt into the Thermo Scientific™
Bioproduction Sustain™ Program to reduce the carbon footprint
of their plastic consumables. The Sustain program provides
customers with high-quality BPCs made with biobased plastic
resins, which help reduce Scope 3 emissions related to BPC
production. This offers facilities a more sustainable option than
using glass bioreactors, and aligns with the growing emphasis on
greener technologies in the biopharmaceutical industry.
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120%
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Total cost of ownership
Years of operation
Benchtop glass bioreactor
Benchtop DynaDrive S.U.B.
Figure 4. Total cost of ownership over the lifetime of equipment.
4 thermofisher.com/dynadrive
For Research Use or Further Manufacturing. Not for diagnostic use or direct administration into humans or animals.
© 2025 Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. All rights reserved. All trademarks are the property of Thermo Fisher Scientific and its
subsidiaries unless otherwise specified. APN-10122337 0425
Learn more at thermofisher.com/dynadrive
Conclusion
The overall performance of the 5 L DynaDrive S.U.B. makes
a compelling case for transitioning from glass benchtop
bioreactors. The combination of higher productivity, lower
costs, scalability, and greater sustainability makes the 5 L
DynaDrive S.U.B. an attractive option for process development
laboratories. The scalability of the DynaDrive S.U.B. product
line enables these benefits to extend easily from development
to large‑scale production, making the 5 L DynaDrive S.U.B. a
valuable investment for future-ready bioprocessing. By adopting
the 5 L DynaDrive S.U.B., process developers can achieve faster
turnaround times and reduce operational costs with a smaller
environmental footprint, all while maintaining high standards for
product quality and consistency.
We offer a comprehensive portfolio of media and other products
for cell culture, product storage, and production. These offerings
can also benefit laboratories in the early development phase.
Gibco media and supplements are designed to support high-yield
cell cultures for both process development and manufacturing,
and Thermo Scientific™ Nalgene™ bottles and carboys are
suitable for a wide range of storage and transfer applications. All
of our BPCs, including the BPC for the 5 L DynaDrive S.U.B., are
made from high-quality bioprocessing films designed to support
healthy cell growth. By incorporating these solutions with the 5 L
DynaDrive S.U.B., process development laboratories can simplify
ordering and optimize their processes from the development
phase to technology transfer for production.
References
1. Solaris Biotech (2025) Choosing the right single use bioreactor system.
solarisbiotechusa.com/choosing-the-right-single-use-bioreactor-system
2. Bioprocess Development Forum (2014) Trends in single-use
bioreactors. processdevelopmentforum.com/resources/articles/
trends-in-single-use-bioreactors
3. Thermo Fisher Scientific (2023) Bioproduction analytics: supporting optimized media
development today and tomorrow. Waltham, MA. assets.thermofisher.com/
TFS-Assets/BPD/Reference-Materials/bioproduction-analytics-supportingoptimized-media-white-paper.pdf
4. Thermo Fisher Scientific (2024) Efficient-Pro Medium and Feed 1 enable rapid
and seamless upstream process development and scale-up for CHO-K1 cells.
Waltham, MA.
5. PharSol Pharmaceutical Solutions (2021) How to control a bioprocess? 6 key
parameters for efficient bioreactor operation. November 11, 2021. pharsol.com/
knowledge-hub/blog/bioreactor-parameters
6. STERIS Life Sciences (2023) Glassware washers and dryers. sterislifesciences.com/
products/equipment/washers-and-dryers
7. STERIS Life Sciences (2023) Steam sterilizers. sterislifesciences.com/products/
steam-sterilizers/steam-sterilizers
Brought to you by
Download the Application Note for FREE Now!
Information you provide will be shared with the sponsors for this content. Technology Networks or its sponsors may contact you to offer you content or products based on your interest in this topic. You may opt-out at any time.
Experiencing issues viewing the form? Click here to access an alternate version