After signing up, you'll start to receive regular news updates from us.
Bayer's GM rice defeat

Complete the form below to unlock access to ALL audio articles.
Nature Biotechnology 29, 473 (2011) doi:10.1038/nbt0611-473c - Published online 07 June 2011
In a lawsuit over genetically modified (GM) modified rice, jury members in an Arkansas circuit court ruled in March in favor of Riceland Foods of Stuttgart, Arkansas, a rice milling and exporting company, and against Bayer CropScience of Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, and Monheim, Germany. The jury recommended that Bayer pay Riceland $136.8 million—$125 million in punitive damages and $11.8 million in compensatory damages—calling Bayer negligent for allowing traces of its genetically engineered Liberty Link, herbicide-tolerant experimental rice to mix with commercial lots of long grain rice in 2006. Back then, Mike Johans, then secretary of the US Department of Agriculture, said: “There are no human health, food safety or environmental concerns associated with this [GM Liberty Link] rice.” Nonetheless, Riceland brought suit, claiming “loss of the European Union market,” which cost it $380 million in potential sales. Bayer counters that rice then destined for Europe “accounted for less than 5% of US-grown rice,” and “quickly was diverted and sold in other markets.” The company, which also points out that the jury-recommended award “exceeds what is permitted by Arkansas law and will therefore be limited to the statutory cap of $1 million,” says it will consider whether to appeal after the court issues its final rulings. Meanwhile, Liberty Link rice, which was not commercialized, is no longer being developed. Jeffrey L Fox