We've updated our Privacy Policy to make it clearer how we use your personal data. We use cookies to provide you with a better experience. You can read our Cookie Policy here.

Advertisement

The Marketplace in Our Brain

The Marketplace in Our Brain content piece image
Credit: Pixabay
Listen with
Speechify
0:00
Register for free to listen to this article
Thank you. Listen to this article using the player above.

Want to listen to this article for FREE?

Complete the form below to unlock access to ALL audio articles.

Read time: 2 minutes

When bidding in a competitive market, our brains use a special type of heuristic to adjust the price depending on the success of previous attempts to buy goods. Moreover, this learning mechanism involves not only the cerebral cortex, but the evolutionary ancient brain area of the striatum. This was the conclusion reached by neuroscientists from the HSE University and the Research Center of Neurology in a study that was published in the European Journal of Neuroscience.


The supply and demand of a certain product affects the price at which we are willing to buy or sell that product. Interestingly market competition influences the exchange of services and resources not only among humans, but among monkeys and even fish. However, the fundamental mechanisms by which we learn to set an appropriate price depending on changes in supply and demand have not yet been fully studied by scientists. In order to learn exactly which processes in our brain are activated when we agree to pay one price or another, scientists from the HSE Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience and the Centre for Neurology conducted a brainimaging experiment.


During the study, subjects participated in an economic game by playing the role of buyers in a double auction. In total, 27 people took part in the experiment. The game simulated three types of double auctions: in the first type, two sellers and one buyer traded in a market with a high supply of goods (with sellers competing); in the second type, one seller and one buyer bargained in a 'noncompetitive' market; and in the third type, two buys bid for a product with one seller in a market with high demand (with buyers competing). In all types of markets, the outcome of the transaction was determined by comparing the highest purchase price with the lowest sale price. During the game, brain activity of subjects (buyers only) was recorded using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).


It turned out that when setting the price, a simple model-based algorithm was used: buyers increased or decreased the price depending on whether this amount was accepted or rejected by sellers at the previous stage of the game. So, if sellers at the previous stage rejected a certain price, then the player reduced it. Such a strategy is called directional learning. Unlike classical value-based reinforcement learning, directional learning presupposes the existence of a priori knowledge of the structure of the problem - this means that people automatically differentiate types of markets and ways to purposefully change prices in a specific market.


An MRI scan of the brain showed that a learning brain signal leading to a price change while bidding occurs in the striatum, an evolutionarily ancient part of the brain involved in the learning process. The results suggest that the brain automatically learn to adjust the price that we are willing to pay for the goods, depending on the behavior of other buyers and sellers.


In addition, the MRI showed that the activity of our parietal cortex encodes the current value of the goods, while the prefrontal cortex 'monitors' the level of competition between sellers and buyers and calculates the preferred price.


For the first time, this study provides insight into the brain mechanisms at work when we determine prices while bidding in competitive market conditions.

Reference: Martinez-Saito, M., Konovalov, R., Piradov, M. A., Shestakova, A., Gutkin, B., & Klucharev, V. (n.d.). Action in auctions: neural and computational mechanisms of bidding behaviour. European Journal of Neuroscience, 0(0). https://doi.org/10.1111/ejn.14492

This article has been republished from the following materials. Note: material may have been edited for length and content. For further information, please contact the cited source.