We've updated our Privacy Policy to make it clearer how we use your personal data.

We use cookies to provide you with a better experience. You can read our Cookie Policy here.

Two-Front Treatment Strategy for Triple-Negative Breast Cancer

Two-Front Treatment Strategy for Triple-Negative Breast Cancer

Two-Front Treatment Strategy for Triple-Negative Breast Cancer

Two-Front Treatment Strategy for Triple-Negative Breast Cancer

Read time:

Want a FREE PDF version of This News Story?

Complete the form below and we will email you a PDF version of "Two-Front Treatment Strategy for Triple-Negative Breast Cancer"

First Name*
Last Name*
Email Address*
Company Type*
Job Function*
Would you like to receive further email communication from Technology Networks?

Technology Networks Ltd. needs the contact information you provide to us to contact you about our products and services. You may unsubscribe from these communications at any time. For information on how to unsubscribe, as well as our privacy practices and commitment to protecting your privacy, check out our Privacy Policy

Researchers at Baylor College of Medicine and collaborating institutions have identified a combination therapy for treating triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) that results in durable tumor regression in an animal model of the condition.

The combination therapy attacked the tumor on two fronts. On one side, the chemotherapy drug cyclophosphamide eliminated tumor cells, while on the other front, another drug inhibited tumor-associated cells called macrophages, which block the body’s immune response against the tumor. This two-front strategy effectively treated several highly aggressive TNBC primary tumors and metastasis. The study appeared in the journal Cancer Research.

“TNBC is an aggressive subtype of breast cancer with an overall poorer prognosis than other breast cancer subtypes,” said co-corresponding author Dr. Jeffrey Rosen, Distinguished Service Professor of molecular and cellular biology and in the Dan L Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center at Baylor.

The team had previously shown in animal models that although treating the tumors with cyclophosphamide eliminated the cancer initially, the disease came back eventually. A closer look into the tumor microenvironment revealed that the tumors that returned typically had many macrophages.

“In this study, we explored the possibility that eliminating both the tumor cells and the macrophages would improve the chances of eliminating the tumor for a longer period of time,” said Swarnima Singh, first author of the paper and a student in Baylor’s graduate school of biomedical sciences working jointly in the Rosen and Zhang laboratories. “We eliminated macrophages with either a small molecule inhibitor or a monoclonal antibody toward CSF1R, a marker on these cells.”

For several months, the team treated the tumors with the combination of drugs. Then, they stopped treatment and followed up tumor progression in the treated animals.

“We were very encouraged by the results,” Singh said. “Typically, a month after stopping single-drug treatment, the tumors returned. We were excited to see that the tumors did not return a month after stopping the combination therapy. We observed a durable response in two animal models of TNBC.”

Interestingly, the animals with a durable response were able to prevent new tumors from growing. “We challenged these animals with fresh tumor cells, and 40% of them rejected them. The tumors did not grow. This suggested that the animals had immune memory capable of fighting back new tumor growth. In addition to primary tumors, we also treated lung tumor metastasis with combination therapy and found that it also eliminated cancer growth effectively.”

Rosen and his colleagues also investigated how the tumor microenvironment had changed in the animals with a durable response.

“We found that when we treated the tumors with one of the two drugs, which did not produce a durable response, immune B and T cells involved in fighting the tumor did not enter it, they remained in the periphery of the tumor mass,” said co-corresponding author Dr. Xiang H.F. Zhang, interim director of the Lester and Sue Smith Breast Center and William T. Butler, M.D., Endowed Chair for Distinguished Faculty. Zhang also is professor of molecular and cellular biology, a member of the Dan L Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center and a McNair Scholar at Baylor.

On the other hand, after combination therapy, both B and T cells entered the tumor mass and remained close to each other, suggesting they were interacting to mediate tumor elimination in a durable manner.

Looking to translate these findings into the clinic, the researchers investigated whether the macrophage signature they had observed in the animal models also was present in TNBC from patients. “Indeed, tumors from patients with the worse prognosis also presented high numbers of macrophages,” Rosen said. “We think this signature can help us identify patients who might be candidates for combination therapy.”

The researchers are planning to conduct a clinical trial to assess the value of their approach in treating human TNBC.

Reference: Singh S, Lee N, Pedroza DA, et al. Chemotherapy coupled to macrophage inhibition induces T-cell and B-cell infiltration and durable regression in triple-negative breast cancer. Cancer Research. 2022:canres.3714.2021. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-21-3714

This article has been republished from the following materials. Note: material may have been edited for length and content. For further information, please contact the cited source.