We've updated our Privacy Policy to make it clearer how we use your personal data.

We use cookies to provide you with a better experience. You can read our Cookie Policy here.

Advertisement
Cell Signaling Insights Leveraged for Glaucoma and Cancer Therapy Development
Article

Cell Signaling Insights Leveraged for Glaucoma and Cancer Therapy Development

Cell Signaling Insights Leveraged for Glaucoma and Cancer Therapy Development
Article

Cell Signaling Insights Leveraged for Glaucoma and Cancer Therapy Development

Read time:
 

Want a FREE PDF version of This Article?

Complete the form below and we will email you a PDF version of "Cell Signaling Insights Leveraged for Glaucoma and Cancer Therapy Development"

First Name*
Last Name*
Email Address*
Country*
Company Type*
Job Function*
Would you like to receive further email communication from Technology Networks?

Technology Networks Ltd. needs the contact information you provide to us to contact you about our products and services. You may unsubscribe from these communications at any time. For information on how to unsubscribe, as well as our privacy practices and commitment to protecting your privacy, check out our Privacy Policy

When you consider the vast number of signaling pathways needed to coordinate the 37.2 trillion cells in the human body, it’s difficult to think of our normal health and functioning as anything less than a miracle.1 Many of the major breakthroughs in our understanding of signaling pathways have been attained by removing organs or creating a “break in the chain”, and observing what functions are affected as a result. For example, an experimental operation intended to halt a man’s severe epileptic seizures left Henry Gustav Molaison with an inability to form new long-term memories. At a huge cost, Molaison’s memory loss led to fundamental insights into the medial temporal lobe and memory organization.2,3 In the 1970s, removal of the cranial cervical sympathetic ganglia from rams,4,5 and removal of the pineal gland6 confirmed the pineal gland as an important mediator of photoperiodic signaling.

There are many similar hallmark stories for each of the major endocrine glands, and studies of specific biological pathways have paved the way for a deeper understanding of disease and created opportunities for therapeutic applications. Cell signaling is now studied on a remarkably intricate level, and new signaling mechanisms continue to be discovered. If you mentioned exosomes, epigenetics or T cell engineering to someone 100 years ago, you would have received blank looks. Here, we share two examples to demonstrate how the intricate knowledge of cell signaling can reveal therapeutic approaches to treating major diseases.

In light of World Glaucoma Week for 2020 (March 8th
14th) we delve into the pathways surrounding a unique neurotrophic factor, Ciliary Neurotrophic Factor (CNTF). We show you the mechanism of its unique receptor binding and share the rationale behind CNTF being explored in glaucoma clinical trials today. Second, we explore the intricacies of poly-ADP ribose polymerase (PARP) signaling and show how it is being pursued as a promising approach to the treatment of cancer.

Protecting retinal ganglion cells important for treating glaucoma


Glaucoma
is a group of eye diseases that cause progressive damage to the optic nerve at the point where it leaves the eye to carry visual information to the brain. As the second leading cause of vision impairment in the world, glaucoma is estimated to affect 6.9 million people globally. The disease is often referred to as the “sneak thief of sight” or the “silent blinding disease”, because it has no symptoms until significant vision loss has occurred. The exact causes of glaucoma are unknown, and its complexities are evident in the ever-growing list of epigenetic and environmental risk factors for the disease. Often, but not always, glaucoma is associated with increased intraocular pressure (IOP), and overcoming this change in IOP has been a major therapeutic approach. However, this is not enough; glaucoma is also associated with the degeneration of retinal ganglion cells (RGCs). Therefore, finding ways to protect or enhance the function of RGCs is a major priority for the field.

Ciliary neurotrophic factor as a candidate therapeutic for glaucoma


CNTF is a neurotrophic cytokine, with a name derived from the finding that CNTF promotes the survival of chick ciliary ganglion neurons (the cells that control pupil constriction) during a critical period of embryonic development.7 While CNTF is not essential for development and survival in mammals, its demonstrated neurotrophic activity across different cell populations has led to it being pursued in clinical trials.8
Jeffrey Goldberg, Professor and Chair of Ophthalmology at the Byers Eye Institute at Stanford University, is focused on the neuroprotection and regeneration of retinal ganglion cells and the optic nerve. His work has been extended to clinical trials across several ocular diseases, as he explains:

“CNTF has shown strong neuroprotection and regeneration effects in many labs and in many preclinical models of glaucoma, and thus is a strong candidate for human testing. A recent Phase 2 trial in a different retinal disease, macular telangiectasia, showed positive neuroprotection effects. We are in the middle of a Phase 2 trial in glaucoma, and based on a strong record of safety and evidence of biological activity in glaucoma patients, we are currently expanding that trial to increase patient numbers and test multiple doses.”

Three-part receptor essential to effects of ciliary neurotrophic factor


CNTF has a unique mode of action, in that it has a three-part component receptor complex. The CNTF-specific component, CNTFRα, does not play a direct role in signaling. Instead, it forms a complex with two other receptor components, gp130 and LIFRβ, which are also shared with other broadly acting cytokines (including interleukin-6 and leukemia inhibitory factor).9 The three receptor components are initially unassociated on the cell surface, and are brought together in a stepwise fashion.9 The effects of CNTF are mostly confined to the nervous system, where the CNTF-specific component of the receptor is mostly found. Meanwhile, the related cytokines are able to exert their effects in non-neuronal cells.

Through this tripartite receptor binding, CNTF has been shown to:

  • Stimulate myelination in oligodendrocyte precursors (via the mitogen activated kinase pathway)10
  • Promote oligodendrocyte precursor survival (mediated by rapid tyrosine phosphorylation of JAK–STAT)11
  • Enhance the survival and regeneration of retinal ganglion cells (RGC) in experimental rat glaucoma, via CNTF overexpression using viral vectors12
  • Protect retinal photoreceptors that have been damaged by excess environmental light or gene mutations13


Goldberg also points to several other pathways that show promise in the pursuit of glaucoma treatment, listed in the table below. He says that “all of these have shown compelling proof-of-concept in pre-clinical models of glaucoma and optic neuropathies, and some are moving into clinical testing in patients.”

Type of signalExample
Neurotrophic factorBDNF, CNTF
Signaling moleculescyclic-AMP
KinasesDLK
Dendrite and synaptic modulatorsC1q
Retinal ganglion cell axon growth regulatorsKruppel-like transcription factors

Examples of signaling molecules showing potential therapeutic benefits for glaucoma.

Critical Challenges in Cell-Based Analysis


Cell-based analysis provides scientists in a wide range of fields with crucial insights into the functionality of cells. However, as cellular models become increasingly advanced, so too do the demands upon the technologies and workflows used to study them. Download this infographic to explore the critical challenges in cell-based analysis.

Download Infographic

Sponsored Content


DNA damage response network leveraged to attack cancer cells


The DNA damage response (DDR) is a network of pathways that sense, signal and repair DNA lesions induced by endogenous (e.g. spontaneous or enzymatic reactions, chemical modifications, replication errors) or exogenous (e.g. ultraviolet radiation, ionizing radiation, genotoxic chemicals) factors.14

Multiple DDR systems repair single-strand and double-strand breaks in DNA, and prevent the generation of potentially deleterious mutations. The dysregulation of DDR pathways results in genome instability, which is a hallmark of cancer.15 Simultaneously, disrupting DNA repair is a therapeutic approach to certain cancer types.

Homologous recombinant repair (HRR) is a type of DDR pathway that repairs double-strand breaks. The most well-known proteins of the HRR pathway are BRCA1 and BRCA2, which play a crucial role in maintaining genome integrity.16 Cells with BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations are HRR deficient, and are a target for a class of cancer drug called “PARP inhibitors”.

PARP is a family of enzymes that were discovered in the 1960s17,18, and shown to play a critical role in DNA repair 20 years later.19

Cells with defective HRR pathways depend on PARP-mediated base excision repair for survival.20 Consequently, the inhibition of PARP is a promising strategy to selectively kill cancer. PARP inhibitors prevent the backup repair system from working by trapping PARP on the DNA, creating a complex that thwarts DNA repair and replication.21 The accumulation of double-strand breaks eventually leads to cell death, allowing HRR-deficient cells to be targeted while leaving healthy cells alone.

Dr. Constantia Pantelidou, Research Fellow at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, was the lead author of a 2019 paper published in
Cancer Discovery that revealed an additional mechanism of action of PARP inhibitors.22 Pantelidou explains:

“We demonstrated that by inducing DNA damage, PARP inhibitors activate a proinflammatory signaling pathway within cancer cells. This leads to production of proinflammatory cytokines and subsequent recruitment and activation of immune cells, such as dendritic cells and CD8+ T cells. CD8+ T cells are the cells that attack and kill tumor cells. Therefore, activation and recruitment of cytotoxic CD8+ T cells to the tumor microenvironment is critical for a productive anti-tumor immune response and subsequent tumor clearance. Our study shows that activation of the proinflammatory signaling pathway in the tumor and CD8+ T cell infiltration are necessary for the anti-tumor efficacy of PARP inhibitors in BRCA-mutated triple negative breast cancers. Therefore our work provides a mechanistic rationale for combining PARP inhibitors with immunotherapies.”

Pantelidou notes that PARP inhibitors are commonly used in combination with a secondary treatment, and that the goal is to maximize patient responses to PARP inhibitors:

“Despite promising activity in BRCA-associated cancers, PARP inhibitor therapy is not curative and can be hindered by drug resistance, that can develop shortly after treatment. In addition, the majority of non-BRCA-mutated cancers do not respond to PARP inhibition. In order to overcome acquired and inherent tumor resistance to PARP inhibitors and extend their utility to BRCA-proficient cancers, efforts have been focused on combinatorial strategies.”

The use of PARP inhibition is being explored in other types of cancer. Recently, the antitumor activity of olaparib against metastatic prostate cancer was confirmed in a prospective clinical trial in a genomically defined population.23

As demonstrated in the two examples above, incremental insights into signaling pathways can be leveraged for therapeutic approaches
even if we are still building a complete picture of the mechanism of action.

References

  1. Bianconi, E., Piovesan, A., Facchin, F., Beraudi, A., Casadei, R., Frabetti, F., Vitale, L., Pelleri, M. C., Tassani, S., Piva, F., Perez-Amodio, S., Strippoli, P., & Canaider, S. (2013). An estimation of the number of cells in the human body. Annals of Human Biology, 40(6), 463–471. https://doi.org/10.3109/03014460.2013.807878
  2. Scoville, W. B., & Milner, B. (1957). LOSS OF RECENT MEMORY AFTER BILATERAL HIPPOCAMPAL LESIONS. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, 20(1), 11–21. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.20.1.11
  3. Squire, L. R. (2009). The Legacy of Patient H.M. for Neuroscience. Neuron, 61(1), 6–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2008.12.023
  4. Barrell, G. K., & Lapwood, K. R. (1979). Effects of modifying olfactory and pineal gland function on the seasonality of semen production and plasma luteinizing hormone, testosterone and prolactin levels in rams. Animal Reproduction Science, 1(3), 229–243. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-4320(79)90004-6
  5. Barrell, G. K., Lapwood, K. R., & Elgar, H. J. (1987). Seasonality of secretion of follicle stimulating hormone in New Zealand Romney rams and effects of cranial sympathetic ganglionectomy. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research, 30(4), 439–442. https://doi.org/10.1080/00288233.1987.10417954
  6. Barrell, G. K., & Lapwood, K. R. (1978). Effects of Pinealectomy of Rams on Secretory Profiles of Luteinizing Hormone, Testosterone, Prolactin and Cortisol. Neuroendocrinology, 27(5–6), 216–227. https://doi.org/10.1159/000122814
  7. Adler, R., Landa, K., Manthorpe, M., & Varon, S. (1979). Cholinergic neuronotrophic factors: Intraocular distribution of trophic activity for ciliary neurons. Science, 204(4400), 1434–1436. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.451576
  8. Pasquin, S., Sharma, M., & Gauchat, J.-F. (2015). Ciliary neurotrophic factor (CNTF): New facets of an old molecule for treating neurodegenerative and metabolic syndrome pathologies. Cytokine & Growth Factor Reviews, 26(5), 507–515. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cytogfr.2015.07.007
  9. Stahl, N., & Yancopoulos, G. D. (1994). The tripartite CNTF receptor complex: Activation and signaling involves components shared with other cytokines. Journal of Neurobiology, 25(11), 1454–1466. https://doi.org/10.1002/neu.480251111
  10. Stahl, N., & Yancopoulos, G. D. (1994). The tripartite CNTF receptor complex: Activation and signaling involves components shared with other cytokines. Journal of Neurobiology, 25(11), 1454–1466. https://doi.org/10.1002/neu.480251111
  11. Dell’Albani, P., Kahn, M. A., Cole, R., Condorelli, D. F., Giuffrida-Stella, A. M., & de Vellis, J. (1998). Oligodendroglial survival factors, PDGF-AA and CNTF, activate similar JAK/STAT signaling pathways. Journal of Neuroscience Research, 54(2), 191–205. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4547(19981015)54:2<191::AID-JNR7>3.0.CO;2-9
  12. Pease, M. E., Zack, D. J., Berlinicke, C., Bloom, K., Cone, F., Wang, Y., Klein, R. L., Hauswirth, W. W., & Quigley, H. A. (2009). Effect of CNTF on Retinal Ganglion Cell Survival in Experimental Glaucoma. Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science, 50(5), 2194. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.08-3013
  13. LaVail, M. M., Unoki, K., Yasumura, D., Matthes, M. T., Yancopoulos, G. D., & Steinberg, R. H. (1992). Multiple growth factors, cytokines, and neurotrophins rescue photoreceptors from the damaging effects of constant light. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 89(23), 11249–11253. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.89.23.11249
  14. Gourley, C., Balmaña, J., Ledermann, J. A., Serra, V., Dent, R., Loibl, S., Pujade-Lauraine, E., & Boulton, S. J. (2019). Moving From Poly (ADP-Ribose) Polymerase Inhibition to Targeting DNA Repair and DNA Damage Response in Cancer Therapy. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 37(25), 2257–2269. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.18.02050
  15. Hanahan, D., & Weinberg, R. A. (2011). Hallmarks of Cancer: The Next Generation. Cell, 144(5), 646–674. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2011.02.013
  16. Mylavarapu, S., Das, A., & Roy, M. (2018). Role of BRCA Mutations in the Modulation of Response to Platinum Therapy. Frontiers in Oncology, 8, 16. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2018.00016
  17. Drew, Y. (2015). The development of PARP inhibitors in ovarian cancer: From bench to bedside. British Journal of Cancer, 113(S1), S3–S9. https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2015.394
  18. Chambon, P., Weill, J. D., & Mandel, P. (1963). Nicotinamide mononucleotide activation of a new DNA-dependent polyadenylic acid synthesizing nuclear enzyme. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, 11(1), 39–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/0006-291X(63)90024-X
  19. Benjamin, R. C. & Gill, D. M. (1980). ADP-ribosylation in mammalian cell ghosts. Dependence of poly(ADP-ribose) synthesis on strand breakage in DNA. The Journal of Biological Chemistry, 255, 10493–10501. https://www.jbc.org/content/255/21/10493.full.pdf+html
  20. Keung, M. Y., Wu, Y., & Vadgama, J. (2019). PARP Inhibitors as a Therapeutic Agent for Homologous Recombination Deficiency in Breast Cancers. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 8(4), 435. https://dx.doi.org/10.3390%2Fjcm8040435
  21. Pommier, Y., OConnor, M. J., & de Bono, J. (2016). Laying a trap to kill cancer cells: PARP inhibitors and their mechanisms of action. Science Translational Medicine, 8(362), 362ps17-362ps17. https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.aaf9246
  22. Pantelidou, C., Sonzogni, O., De Oliveria Taveira, M., Mehta, A. K., Kothari, A., Wang, D., Visal, T., Li, M. K., Pinto, J., Castrillon, J. A., Cheney, E. M., Bouwman, P., Jonkers, J., Rottenberg, S., Guerriero, J. L., Wulf, G. M., & Shapiro, G. I. (2019). PARP Inhibitor Efficacy Depends on CD8 + T-cell Recruitment via Intratumoral STING Pathway Activation in BRCA-Deficient Models of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer. Cancer Discovery, 9(6), 722–737. https://doi.org/10.1158/2159-8290.CD-18-1218
  23. Mateo, J., Porta, N., Bianchini, D., McGovern, U., Elliott, T., Jones, R., Syndikus, I., Ralph, C., Jain, S., Varughese, M., Parikh, O., Crabb, S., Robinson, A., McLaren, D., Birtle, A., Tanguay, J., Miranda, S., Figueiredo, I., Seed, G., … de Bono, J. S. (2020). Olaparib in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer with DNA repair gene aberrations (TOPARP-B): A multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 2 trial. The Lancet Oncology, 21(1), 162–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30684-9
Meet The Author
Michele Trott, PhD
Michele Trott, PhD
Advertisement