We've updated our Privacy Policy to make it clearer how we use your personal data. We use cookies to provide you with a better experience. You can read our Cookie Policy here.


Experimental Compound Reduced Complications of Diabetes in Mice

Experimental Compound Reduced Complications of Diabetes in Mice content piece image
The larger, centrally located structure shown here is a glomerulus in a mouse kidney, which is known to be damaged by diabetes, as made evident by the scar tissue dyed purple in the image. The study authors show that administration of RAGE229 to diabetic mice reduced damage to the glomeruli and surrounding structures in the kidney. Credit: Reprinted with permission from A. Schmidt et al., Sci. Transl. Med. 13, eabf7084 (2021).
Listen with
Register for free to listen to this article
Thank you. Listen to this article using the player above.

Want to listen to this article for FREE?

Complete the form below to unlock access to ALL audio articles.

Read time: 3 minutes

An experimental compound reduced complications of type 1 and type 2 diabetes in mice – not by lowering blood sugar – but by countering its consequences: cell death, inflammation, and organ damage. 

Published online in Science Translational Medicine on November 24, the study reported that a new class of compounds blocked the ability of a protein called RAGE to pass on inflammatory signals that injure the heart and kidneys in diabetes, and that slow the healing of diabetic wounds.

The results revolve around the body’s immune system, which recognizes and destroys invading bacteria and viruses. This system’s activation causes inflammation, responses like swelling and pain that result from the homing in by immune cells into sites of infection or injury. Many diseases – including diabetes – include misplaced inflammation that damages tissues.

Experiments in human cells and mouse models found that the lead study compound, RAGE229, significantly reduced short- and long-term complications of diabetes.

“Our results establish the molecular backbone of RAGE229 as the foundation for a new approach that targets intracellular RAGE actions to counter diabetic tissue damage,” says lead study author Ann Marie Schmidt, MD, the Dr. Iven Young Professor of Endocrinology at NYU Grossman School of Medicine. “With further refinements, RAGE229 and its descendants have great potential to fill gaps in treatment, including that most current drugs work only against type 2 diabetes.”

Picking a Lead


Most narratives of diabetes say that diet and age (Type 2) or genetic differences (Type 1) reduce action or production of the hormone insulin, which keeps blood sugar levels in check after meals supply the body with energy. While high blood sugar causes inflammatory damage, past work has also established that mechanisms occurring later in, and common to, both types of diabetes could be targeted separately by novel drug candidates.

In particular, high blood sugar generates greater numbers of charged particles that tear apart cell components like DNA. This kills cells, which fall apart and spill their contents, including damage-associated molecular patterns or DAMPS. Such “danger molecules” inform the body that a tissue is under stress, in some cases by activating RAGE, say the authors.  When a DAMP docks into RAGE on a cell’s outer surface, it changes the receptor’s shape to pass messages into the cell’s inner compartment, the cytoplasm. Schmidt and colleagues had shown previously that the RAGE cytoplasmic “tail” (ctRAGE) interacts with a protein called DIAPH1 to pass on such messages, which ultimately activate inflammatory genes.

The current research team screened through a library of 59,000 compounds to ultimately develop RAGE229, the candidate that best interfered with the DIAPH1:ctRAGE interaction. Using a test that triggers inflammation in mice as measured by swelling in their paws, the team showed that those treated with RAGE229 had a significantly lower inflammation score of 2.5 (on a 1-5 scale) versus a score of 3.3 in mice given an inert solvent, also called a vehicle, for comparison.

Other experiments reflected the increased risk for heart attack in patients with diabetes, created in part by higher inflammation levels. In male mice with type-1-like diabetes and a temporary blockage of a coronary artery, simulating a heart attack, the researchers found that the amount of heart muscle that died (infarct volume) downstream of a blockage was 28 percent in RAGE229-treated mice, versus 38 percent in mice treated with vehicle.

The team next incorporated the RAGE229 molecule into mouse chow because dietary intake could better measure its ability to reverse long-term complications like diabetic wounds. High blood sugar and related inflammation have been shown to interfere with cells that create scar tissue to close wounds. The researchers found that the percent of wound closure after 21 days was 90 percent in male type 2 diabetic mice treated with RAGE229, compared to 65 percent in those treated with vehicle. Both male and female mice treated with RAGE229 also had significantly better healing than vehicle-treated mice at the microscopic level (histological evidence).

The research team also found that male and female type 1-like or type-2-like diabetic mice fed RAGE229 chow had significantly less kidney damage than mice fed control chow by several measures, including reduced inflammation-driven mesangial sclerosis – protein build-up that reduces the organs’ capacity to properly filter wastes from the bloodstream.

“The RAGE229 used in the our study will not the be version recommended should it move forward into human clinical trials,” says Schmidt. “We continue to aggressively synthesize and test new compounds and chemically modifications RAGE229. These new molecules promise to yield a final drug candidate with optimal potency in the foreseeable future.”

Reference: Manigrasso MB, Rabbani P, Egaña-Gorroño L, et al. Small-molecule antagonism of the interaction of the RAGE cytoplasmic domain with DIAPH1 reduces diabetic complications in mice. Sci Transl Med. 13(621):eabf7084. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.abf7084

This article has been republished from the following materials. Note: material may have been edited for length and content. For further information, please contact the cited source.