We've updated our Privacy Policy to make it clearer how we use your personal data.

We use cookies to provide you with a better experience. You can read our Cookie Policy here.

New Details of Potential Alzheimer’s Treatment Uncovered

New Details of Potential Alzheimer’s Treatment Uncovered

New Details of Potential Alzheimer’s Treatment Uncovered

New Details of Potential Alzheimer’s Treatment Uncovered

Read time:

Want a FREE PDF version of This News Story?

Complete the form below and we will email you a PDF version of "New Details of Potential Alzheimer’s Treatment Uncovered"

First Name*
Last Name*
Email Address*
Company Type*
Job Function*
Would you like to receive further email communication from Technology Networks?

Technology Networks Ltd. needs the contact information you provide to us to contact you about our products and services. You may unsubscribe from these communications at any time. For information on how to unsubscribe, as well as our privacy practices and commitment to protecting your privacy, check out our Privacy Policy

Taking a new approach, scientists from the Florida campus of The Scripps Research Institute (TSRI) have uncovered some surprising details of a group of compounds that have shown significant potential in stimulating the growth of brain cells and memory restoration in animal models that mimic Alzheimer’s disease.

The new study points to promising new directions using a known therapeutic strategy for Alzheimer’s disease—a disorder that will affect nearly 14 million Americans by 2050, according to the Alzheimer’s Association.

The study, which was led by TSRI Associate Professors Courtney Miller and Gavin Rumbaugh, appears online ahead of print in the journal Neuropsychopharmacology.

This new study builds on previous findings from Miller and Rumbaugh demonstrating the memory-rescuing potential of inhibiting histone deacetylases (HDACs), a family of signaling enzymes that act like molecular switches, silencing gene expression by controlling access to the cell’s nuclear cache of tightly compacted DNA. Mutations in HDACs genes have been associated with health problems including cancer, inflammatory and autoimmune diseases, metabolic disorders and loss of memory function.

Miller and Rumbaugh note that current efforts by many research teams focus on developing “isoform-selective” HDAC inhibitors—for example, select members of Class 1 HDACs such as HDAC 1, -2 or -3—in order to limit the potential for unwanted side effects. However, the Scripps Florida researchers wondered if some of the potential of memory rescue could be lost with this increased selectivity.

To investigate, in the current study, the Scripps Florida team used inhibitors initially developed by Professor Joel Gottesfeld, a molecular biologist on TSRI’s La Jolla campus, and subsequently by biotech firm Repligen Corporation, to attack more than one form of Class 1 HDAC at the same time in a mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease.

“We wanted to find out which inhibitors were the most selective and the most effective in restoring memory function,” Miller said. “We found the key to memory restoration was the growth of new synapses (synaptogenesis), which required simultaneous inhibition of multiple HDACs.”

“We found evidence that better synapse growth was associated with less specific inhibition of Class 1 HDACs,” Rumbaugh added. “There was a clear correlation between synapse building— which may lead to improved network power—and memory restoration by the different HDAC inhibitors.”

Interestingly, memory was not enhanced in normal animals by chronic pretreatment with multiple HDAC inhibitors, suggesting a diseased brain responds to these compounds differently than a healthy brain.

In addition to Miller and Rumbaugh, who was first author the study with Research Associate Stephanie E. Sillivan, other authors of the study, “Pharmacological Selectivity within Class I Histone Deacetylases Predicts Effects On Synaptic Function and Memory Rescue,” include Emin D. Ozkan, Camilo S. Rojas, Christopher R. Hubbs, Massimiliano Aceti and Sathyanarayanan V. Puthanveettil of TSRI; Mark Kilgore and J. David Sweatt of The University of Alabama at Birmingham; and Shashi Kudugunti and James Rusche of Repligen Corporation. For more information on the study, see http://www.nature.com/npp/journal/vaop/ncurrent/full/npp201593a.html.

The work was supported by the National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01DA034116; R03DA033499), National Institute for Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01NS064079; R21NS082640); National Institute for Mental Health (R01MH096847; R01MH57014); and Repligen Corporation.