We've updated our Privacy Policy to make it clearer how we use your personal data. We use cookies to provide you with a better experience. You can read our Cookie Policy here.

Advertisement

Potent Therapeutic 'Warheads' That Target Cancer Cells

Listen with
Speechify
0:00
Register for free to listen to this article
Thank you. Listen to this article using the player above.

Want to listen to this article for FREE?

Complete the form below to unlock access to ALL audio articles.

Read time: 1 minute

In a pair of related studies, chemists from the Florida campus of The Scripps Research Institute (TSRI) have identified and designed dozens of molecular “warheads” that not only can detect a key biomarker of cancer, but also could be developed into a potent new class of drug candidates for a range of diseases.

A number of these molecules are already “hidden” in drugs approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), raising the possibility that these widely used pharmaceuticals could be made even more effective using more potent/selective covalent inhibitors or “warheads.”

The studies, which were published recently in the journals Chemical Science and Chemical Communication, were led by TSRI Associate Professor Kate Carroll.

The molecules in question are known as “nucleophiles” (literally, nucleus lovers), which share their electrons with “electrophiles” (literally, electron lovers) and serve as their atomic dance partners. This sharing of electrons creates an interaction known as a covalent bond, which some consider the fundamental basis of chemical reactivity.

Electrophiles have been available to the scientific community for decades for use as tools to probe levels of cysteine sulfenic acid—a marker for cancer and other diseases—and to install as “warheads” or covalent modifiers in drugs that target high levels of sulfenic acid in cells.

The downside of electrophiles is that they compete with high concentrations of off-target nucleophiles in the cell, such as glutathione. In addition, this class of covalent inhibitors indiscriminately targets the protein in healthy and diseased cells. “To counteract this effect, our complementary approach would use nucleophile ‘warheads’ attached to a binding scaffold that would target sulfenic acid on therapeutically important proteins in unhealthy cells under oxidative stress,” said Carroll.

To produce a library of “designer” nucleophiles with far greater reactivity, Carroll and her colleague, Senior Research Associate Vinayak Gupta, developed a unique screen. So far, some of the nucleophiles they identified possess more than 200 times the current standard for sulfenic acid probes.

“We now have about 150 of these ‘warheads’ in our library,” Carroll said.

While the greater interest in the scientific community has been in electrophiles, the TSRI team also examined previously unidentified nucleophilic functional groups, such as those within the Pfizer rheumatoid arthritis drug tofacitinib (XELJANZ®).

“The nucleophiles we identified in this study represent the first covalent strategy to target sulfenic acid that should be highly enabling for the drug discovery community,” Gupta said. “Moreover, our findings that tofacitinib reacts robustly with sulfenic acid shows that ‘warheads’ or other functional groups in these drugs may indeed have new or alternative mechanisms of action.”

Carroll added, “Tofacitinib may have multiple modes of action that include a nucleophile targeting cysteine sulfenic acid in the active site of JAK kinases. If the nucleophile contributes positively to therapeutic outcome, it might be possible to optimize that chemical property and make the drug more effective.”

Carroll says she uncovers more instances of nucleophiles “hidden in plain sight” every day, suggesting that nucleophiles may, in fact, be unsung central players in these reactions.