We've updated our Privacy Policy to make it clearer how we use your personal data. We use cookies to provide you with a better experience. You can read our Cookie Policy here.


“Unclear” Whether Opioids Are Effective Against Cancer Pain

A pile of empty prescription pill bottles.
Credit: Haley Lawrence/ Unsplash
Listen with
Register for free to listen to this article
Thank you. Listen to this article using the player above.

Want to listen to this article for FREE?

Complete the form below to unlock access to ALL audio articles.

Read time: 2 minutes

The world's largest review on opioid medicines for cancer pain has found it is unclear whether some commonly used opioid medicines are better than a placebo and suggests that non-opioid medicines, including aspirin, may be as effective as opioids.

Researchers examining the data on opioids for pain caused by cancer have found surprisingly large gaps in evidence regarding the true benefits of these medicines for cancer pain. The review challenges the commonly held view that opioids are the most powerful pain relievers.

The University of Sydney-led review highlights there is no ‘one size fits all’ treatment approach for cancer pain, urging health professionals and patients to carefully weigh up the evidence when deciding on a suitable pain management plan.

Opioid pain relievers are the most common treatment for cancer pain management. Many international guidelines including the World Health Organization, recommend opioid medications to manage background cancer pain (constant pain) and breakthrough cancer pain (temporary flare-ups of pain in addition to background pain).

However, the study found very few trials have compared commonly used opioid medicines such as morphine, oxycodone and methadone with placebo.

Want more breaking news?

Subscribe to Technology Networks’ daily newsletter, delivering breaking science news straight to your inbox every day.

Subscribe for FREE

The study did not find convincing evidence that morphine was better or safer than other opioid medicines for background cancer pain outside of end-of-life care.

This is despite morphine being widely viewed as the ‘gold standard treatment’ for cancer care by physicians and recommended in many international clinical guidelines for moderate to severe cancer pain because of its low cost and accessibility.

The review also found non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) including aspirin and diclofenac may be at least as effective as some opioids for background cancer pain.

“The lack of evidence comparing opioid medicines to placebo for cancer pain probably reflects the ethical and logistical challenges associated with carrying out such trials. Yet these trials are necessary to guide clinical decision making,” says lead researcher Dr Christina Abdel Shaheed from the University of Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health and Sydney Musculoskeletal Health which is an initiative of the University of Sydney, Sydney Local Health District and Northern Sydney Local Health District.

“In practise, opioids are indispensable for intractable pain and distress at the end of life. What is worth highlighting is that non-opioids, particularly NSAIDs, are surprisingly effective for some cancer pain, and may avoid the problems of dependence and waning opioid analgesia over time,” says co-author Professor Jane Ballantyne, from the University of Washington School of Medicine, USA.

“People with background cancer pain may have an overall better life experience if there is less focus on using opioids to reduce their pain level,” says co-author Professor Martin Underwood from the University of Warwick, UK.


“The hope is that the findings can help guide doctors and patients to choose between different opioid treatment for cancer pain and empower individuals to consider alternatives if they are unable to tolerate opioid medicines or choose not to take them,” said senior author Dr Mark Sidhom, from the Cancer Therapy Centre, Liverpool Hospital, Australia.

Key findings:

    • The study examined data from more than 150 published clinical trials.
    • There were very few trials comparing opioid medicines to placebo.
    • Of the placebo-controlled trials, there is moderate certainty evidence tapentadol works better than placebo for background pain caused by cancer.
    • Opioids commonly thought of as weaker (eg codeine), or NSAIDs such as aspirin, piroxicam, ketorolac, diclofenac and the antidepressant medicine imipramine may be just as good as ‘powerful’ opioids for background cancer pain, with fewer side effects.
    • For breakthrough cancer pain, fentanyl used as a nasal spray, under the tongue, between the gum and cheek, or as an oral spray, may be more effective than placebo (although not for regular use). Fentanyl was also associated with more side effects than placebo.
    • It is possible that morphine and other opioids may affect how well the body is able to fight cancer. Research is needed to determine whether there are negative interactions between opioid medicines and anti-cancer treatments or the immune system, to ensure that pain management does not negatively impact the ability to effectively treat the cancer.
    • More research is needed, particularly on non-drug interventions for cancer pain management.

    Reference: Abdel Shaheed C, Hayes C, Maher CG, et al. Opioid analgesics for nociceptive cancer pain: A comprehensive review. CA: Cancer J Clinic. 2023. doi: 10.3322/caac.21823

    This article has been republished from the following materials. Note: material may have been edited for length and content. For further information, please contact the cited source.