From Tissue to Sequencing-Ready Nuclei
App Note / Case Study
Published: April 17, 2026
Credit: Miltenyi.
Single-nucleus RNA sequencing (snRNA-seq) has become an essential tool for profiling gene expression in difficult-to-isolate cell types, frozen samples, and rare or fragile cell types.
The quality of any snRNA-seq experiment ultimately depends on what happens before sequencing begins. Inaccurate nuclei counts introduce bias, skew cell-type representation, and compromise the biological conclusions that can be drawn from the data.
This application note presents a validated, standardized workflow for automated nuclei extraction, enrichment, and purification from snap-frozen tissues that can achieve purities of over 90% in under 40 minutes.
Download this application note to learn how to:
- Obtain reliable sequencing results and meet quality standards
- Fine-tune nuclei counting, even for samples with irregular morphology
- Increase nuclei purity easily using magnetic separation
Optimized nuclei preparation workflow
for genomic applications
Background
Nuclei preparation is a crucial step for downstream genomics
applications, such as single-nucleus RNA sequencing
(snRNA-seq), and often requires high quality and purity of
nuclei to achieve reproducible results. SnRNA-seq offers
numerous advantages over single-cell RNA-sequencing
(scRNA-seq), including the ability to study difficult-to-isolate
cell types, overcome cell-size limitations, facilitate frozen-tissue
analysis, and access the nuclear transcriptome to provide
valuable insights into transcriptional regulation and splicing
patterns. To meet quality standards and obtain reliable results
for snRNA-seq, an optimized workflow for the preparation of
nuclei is required.
Automating nuclei extraction with gentleMACS™ Tissue
Dissociators enables high-throughput extraction without
requiring extensive hands-on time. Subsequent purification of
the nucleus suspension is essential and can be accomplished
in as little as 40 minutes with MACS® Technology, making the
entire preparation process as simple and fast as possible.
This application note presents a comprehensive workflow for
preparing nuclei from snap-frozen tissue samples, including
human ovarian carcinoma (human OvCa) as well as mouse
heart, liver, and brain samples. An essential factor that can
affect subsequent enrichment and analysis is the correct nuclei
count. In terms of sequencing, accurate counting not only
determines the exact number of nuclei available, but also helps
to achieve a balanced representation of different cell types
within the sample.
Any inaccuracies in counting can lead to biased results,
misinterpretations, or the exclusion of rare cell populations,
which can significantly compromise the biological insights
gained from snRNA-seq experiments. To mitigate the potential
pitfalls of inaccurate counting, it is recommended to employ
multiple counting methods, such as flow cytometry-based
and fluorescence image-based techniques. This multifaceted
approach enhances the robustness of the counting process
and helps validate the accuracy of the results.
In addition, ensuring the purity of the nuclei is essential for
snRNA-seq for several reasons. It ensures biologically relevant
results by preventing contamination from foreign RNA sources,
maintains data integrity by reducing imprecision, and improves
resource efficiency by reducing the sequencing depth required
for meaningful results. This application note demonstrates
how to optimize nuclei preparation, perform accurate counting,
and thus obtain reliable and reproducible snRNA-seq data.
Materials and methods
Nuclei extraction and enrichment
Nuclei were extracted from three samples of 50 mg human
OvCa samples, whole mouse hearts, 75 mg mouse liver, and
50 mg mouse brain samples in biological triplicates using
Nuclei Extraction Buffer with a gentleMACS C Tube on a
gentleMACS Octo Dissociator with Heaters, according to the
manufacturer’s instructions. The temperature of the nucleus
suspension was kept cold during the extraction process
using the gentleMACS Octo Coolers. After extraction,
1×10⁶ nuclei from each sample were used for further
enrichment by magnetic separation with Anti-Nucleus
MicroBeads on a QuadroMACS™ Separator, according to
the manufacturer’s instructions.*
Nuclei counting
Quantification of nuclei was performed first after extracting
and second after enriching the nuclei. Analysis of the
nucleus count was conducted by flow cytometry using
the MACSQuant® Analyzer 10 utilizing DAPI as the nuclei
staining agent. Subsequent data analysis was carried out
using MACSQuantify™ Software. In parallel, single-nuclei
suspensions were stained using the acridine orange (AO)/
propidium iodide (PI) Viability Assay (DeNovix®) in order to
differentiate between nuclei, intact cells, and debris.
Nuclei count was then determined using the CellDrop™
FL Automated Cell Counter (DeNovix), according to the
manufacturer’s instructions.
1
Fine-tuning the nuclei count for nuclei with aberrant shape
Adjusting protocol settings for improved nuclei counts in
specific tissues with the CellDrop FL Automated Cell Counter
(CellDrop FL) relies on the user’s expertise to optimize the
settings for different sample types. Lowering the maximum
diameter threshold helps separate nuclei that are counted
as a single large object, while increasing the threshold
prevents single large objects from being inaccurately counted.
Fluorescence thresholds reduce interference from
background signals.
The so-called “irregular cell mode” accommodates nonspherical nuclei, such as those found in smooth muscle and
cardiac cells as well as in binucleated cells that are regularly
present in cancer samples. Once this mode is set, diameter
adjustments can be performed in real time for each tissue
and saved for future nuclei counts. Ensuring appropriate
fluorescence threshold settings is also an important
consideration depending on media/extraction or if high
exposures are required. For more information, please visit
the DeNovix website.
Fluorescence imaging of nuclei
For fluorescence microscopy analysis, the brain nuclei were
stained after enrichment using DRAQ5™. Subsequently,
these stained nuclei were examined using the laser-scanning
microscope LSM 710 (ZEISS®) at 63× magnification using a
Plan-Apochromat 63×/1.4 Oil DICII objective (ZEISS®). This
configuration allowed in-depth inspection of nuclear integrity.
Results
Efficient and automated nuclei extraction
from different tissue types
Automated nuclei extraction for each tissue type was
performed in triplicates, each sample of the same weight.
The total extraction volume for each sample was 4 mL after
rinsing the gentleMACS C Tube with an additional 2 mL of
Nuclei Extraction Buffer to maximize the recovery of nuclei
(as described in the Nuclei Extraction Buffer data sheet).
Following extraction, nuclei quantification was conducted on
the MACSQuant Analyzer 10 utilizing DAPI staining (fig 2).
In detail, extraction of human OvCa samples obtained from
50 mg tissue fragments yielded an average number of
1.46×10⁵ nuclei/mg. Whole mouse heart samples yielded an
average of 0.48×10⁵ nuclei/mg. For liver samples weighing
75 mg, the average nuclei yield was 2.26×10⁵ nuclei/mg, while
mouse brain samples weighing 50 mg, the average yield of
nuclei was 2.36×10⁵ nuclei/mg. Overall, the individual nuclei
concentrations of the biological replicates demonstrated a
high level of reproducibility.
Figure 1: Nuclei preparation workflow overview. Generation of single-nucleus suspensions from tissue for snRNA-seq analysis, including automated
extraction on the gentleMACS Octo Dissociator with Heaters and enrichment with Anti-Nucleus MicroBeads based on MACS Technology. Ori: original
fraction, POS: positive fraction.
1×10⁶
1×10⁵
1×10⁴
Count nuclei/mg
169,721 mm
Human OvCa
Mouse heart Mouse liver Mouse brain
Figure 2: Preparation of single-nucleus suspensions from different
tissues. The figure shows the numbers of extracted nuclei per mg
of dissociated human OvCa, mouse heart, mouse liver, and mouse
brain, as indicated in the figure legend. Single-nucleus suspensions
were obtained from frozen tissue samples by using the Nuclei Extraction
Buffer in combination with the gentleMACS Octo Dissociator with
Heaters and installed frozen gentleMACS Octo Coolers. Nuclei
were stained with DAPI and analyzed by flow cytometry using the
MACSQuant Analyzer 10.
Extraction Spin and filter
Extraction Enrichment Downstream analysis
Count ORI Filter and Count POS
labeling
MACS
Technology
LS Columns
Anti-Nucleus
MicroBeads
DeNovix
CellDrop™
Automated
Cell Counter
DeNovix
CellDrop™
Automated
Cell Counter
2
Comparable nuclei counts between MACSQuant Analyzer
and CellDrop FL for increased reliability
To validate the nuclei concentration values, a comparative
analysis was conducted between the cell counter (CellDrop
FL) and the MACSQuant Analyzer 10, both immediately after
nuclei extraction (fig. 3A) and after nuclei enrichment (fig. 3B).
To better illustrate the comparison, nuclei/mL concentration
values were assessed. Strikingly, an initial observation reveals
a close alignment in the count of nuclei concentration
recorded across all tissue types (fig. 3A).
In particular, human OvCa samples exhibited a notable
prevalence of nuclei from binucleated cells, a phenomenon
commonly seen in tumor samples, which appeared as a distinct
population in the flow cytometer dot plot with increased
DAPI signal and interconnected nuclei in the fluorescence
microscopy image. Fine tuning of the settings on the CellDrop
FL was necessary to accurately quantify these binucleated
cells as described in the method section.
Furthermore, due to the non-uniform, oval/oblong
morphology of nuclei in heart and muscle tissues, specific
adjustments in the cell counter were also essential to
determine accurate nuclei concentration (see methods
section). Subsequently, 1×106
nuclei from each sample were
further enriched by MACS Technology using Anti-Nucleus
MicroBeads and the numbers were re-evaluated after elution
of the positive fraction (POS) (fig. 3B). Again, no significant
differences were observed between the results of the two
counting methods, demonstrating their high comparability.
Anti-Nucleus MicroBeads significantly
increased nuclei purity in all samples
Next, the purity of nuclei from each sample was determined
using the MACSQuant Analyzer 10 by measuring the DAPIpositive events before and after enrichment (fig. 4A). For
human OvCa samples, purity was already at a high level
of approximately 80% immediately after extraction, and
enrichment resulted in an increase in purity to approximately
90%. Mouse heart and mouse liver samples showed lower
purity after extraction, both at around 60%.
Further enrichment of both mouse heart and liver samples
resulted in a significant increase in purity to around 90%.
High amounts of debris were found in mouse brain samples
with a very low nuclei purity of approximately 6%.
Count ORI
1×10⁷
1×10⁶
1×10⁵
1×10⁴
Count nuclei/mL
Human
OvCa
Mouse
heart
Mouse
liver
Mouse
brain
A
Count POS
1×10⁷
1×10⁶
1×10⁵
1×10⁴
Count nuclei/mL
Human
OvCa
Mouse
heart
Mouse
liver
Mouse
brain
B
CellDrop FL MACSQuant Analyzer
Figure 3: Comparison of nuclei counts. Nuclei quantification was
performed using both the MACSQuant Analyzer 10 with DAPI staining
and the CellDrop FL Automated Cell Counter (CellDrop FL) with
AO/PI staining in two stages: (A) after extraction: ORI, and (B) after
enrichment: POS.
15,196 mm
Purity %
Human
OvCa
Mouse
heart
Mouse
liver
Mouse
brain
A
100
90
80
60
40
20
0
ORI POS
B ORI POS Human OvCa Mouse heart Mouse liver Mouse brain
Figure 4: Purity assessment after enrichment with Anti-Nucleus
MicroBeads using MACS Technology. (A) The percentage of
nuclei purity, including both ORI and POS levels, measured with the
MACSQuant Analyzer 10 and visualized with DAPI staining. (B) Cropped
image regions from the CellDrop FL to illustrate changes in ORI and
POS samples. The nuclei, shown by red PI staining, represent DNA,
while viable cells are highlighted in green with AO staining. Unstained
particles are identified as debris.
3
Products Order no.
Nuclei extraction
Nuclei Extraction Buffer 130-128-024
gentleMACS C Tubes 130-093-237
gentleMACS Octo Dissociator with Heaters 130-096-427
gentleMACS Octo Coolers 130-130-533
MACS SmartStrainers (30 µm) 130-098-458
MACS SmartStrainers (70 µm) 130-098-462
MACS SmartStrainers (100 µm) 130-098-463
MACS BSA Stock Solution 130-091-376
Nuclei enrichment
Anti-Nucleus MicroBeads 130-132-997
LS Columns 130-042-401
QuadroMACS Separator 130-090-976
MACS MultiStand 130-042-303
Nuclei staining
MACSQuant Analyzer 10 130-096-343
DAPI Staining Solution 130-111-570
DRAQ5 Staining Solution 130-117-343
* RNase inhibitor (0.2 U/μL final concentration) was added to the
nucleus separation buffer for mouse brain samples after the
extraction procedure for subsequent enrichment and preparation
of snRNA-seq.
Figure 5: Single-nuclei suspension from enriched mouse brain
nuclei. Single nuclei were enriched via MACS Technology using
Anti-Nucleus MicroBeads. Immediately after the nuclei enrichment,
the nuclei were stained using DRAQ5 Staining Solution. The image
shows an overlay of DRAQ5 (pink) and brightfield obtained with a
LSM 710 microscope at 63× magnification.
50 µm 10 µm
Nucleus enrichment was able to significantly increase the
purity of the mouse brain nucleus suspension to over 90%,
demonstrating the strength of Anti-Nucleus MicroBeads in
bringing samples with high amounts of debris to maximum
purity in a relatively short period of time.
While purity was quantified using the flow cytometer, the
images from the CellDrop instrument were used as a visual
indication of sample quality (fig. 4B). Here, we observed
both debris and residual viable cells present in the original
fraction (ORI) and clean samples with only nuclei obtained
in the enriched fraction (POS), confirming the purity results
previously obtained with the MACSQuant Analyzer.
Enriched nuclei demonstrate high
integrity as seen in microscopic images
Visual validation of nuclei integrity is highly recommended
when downstream experiments are planned that require
high-quality assessment of nuclei, such as snRNA-seq.
To demonstrate the integrity of enriched brain nuclei samples,
fluorescence imaging was performed at 63× magnification
(fig. 5). The results demonstrate clean samples, with the
lack-of-debris particles confirming the high levels of purity
determined by flow cytometry. In addition, the nuclei have a
round appearance and sharp borders, highlighting the integrity
of the nuclei, as clearly seen in the enlarged picture on the right.
Conclusion
• Automated extraction of nuclei using Nuclei Extraction
Buffer on the gentleMACS Octo Dissociator with Heaters
from a variety of tissues results in a high yield of nuclei.
The use of gentleMACS Octo Coolers during the process
ensures the integrity of the nuclei.
• Enrichment with Anti-Nucleus MicroBeads increases the
purity of all sample types, ensuring high-quality sample
input for downstream genomics applications, such as
single-nucleus RNA sequencing.
• Accurate cell-counting methods, using systems such as the
MACSQuant Analyzer and the DeNovix CellDrop FL, show
close correlation in the cell concentration numbers obtained
across all tissue types, ensuring accurate quantification.
• High-quality snRNA-seq results can be achieved with
enriched nuclei, enhancing transcriptome confidence,
improving gene counts, and reducing error susceptibility
for downstream experiments.
See how enriched nuclei generate
high-quality snRNA-seq results with
the Chromium™ Single Cell 5’ v1.1
Reagent Kit (10× Genomics®) and
an Illumina® System.
miltenyibiotec.com/
nuclei-enrichment
LEARN MORE
130-134-254
Miltenyi Biotec B.V. & Co. KG | Friedrich-Ebert-Straße 68 | 51429 Bergisch Gladbach | Germany | Phone +49 2204 8306-0 | Fax +49 2204 85197
macsde@miltenyi.com | www.miltenyibiotec.com
Miltenyi Biotec provides products and services worldwide. Visit www.miltenyibiotec.com/local to find your nearest Miltenyi Biotec contact.
Unless otherwise specifically indicated, Miltenyi Biotec products and services are for research use only and not for therapeutic or diagnostic use. gentleMACS,
MACS, MACSQuant, MACSQuantify, QuadroMACS, and the Miltenyi Biotec logo are registered trademarks or trademarks of Miltenyi Biotec B.V. & Co. KG and/or
its affiliates in various countries worldwide. All other trademarks mentioned in this document are the property of their respective owners and are used for
identification purposes only. Copyright © 2024 Miltenyi Biotec and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved.
Brought to you by
Download the Application Note for FREE Now!
Information you provide will be shared with the sponsors for this content. Technology Networks or its sponsors may contact you to offer you content or products based on your interest in this topic. You may opt-out at any time.
Experiencing issues viewing the form? Click here to access an alternate version