Driving Discovery Through Superior NGS Data Quality
eBook
Published: May 20, 2026
Credit: Covaris.
Next-generation sequencing continues to transform translational research by enabling deeper genomic insight across diverse sample types.
Yet inconsistent DNA fragmentation, workflow inefficiencies, and sequencing bias can compromise coverage uniformity, variant detection, and overall data reliability. As pressure grows to accelerate discovery with confidence, researchers need streamlined workflows that support reproducible, high-quality library preparation.
This eBook explores how integrated acoustic shearing and optimized library prep workflows improve sequencing consistency, reduce variability, and support more accurate downstream analysis.
Download this eBook to discover:
- How DNA fragmentation using Adaptive Focused Acoustics (AFA®) technology improves coverage uniformity and variant detection
- Why integrated library preparation workflows reduce variability and failed libraries
- Strategies for improving sequencing accuracy across low-input and challenging sample types
Driving Discovery
Through Data Quality
Reliable Library Preparation and NGS
Results Powered by Adaptive Focused
Acoustics® (AFA®) TechnologyContents
Foreword........................................................................................................................................................3
Shear Brilliance: Precision Sample Prep for Trustworthy Genomic Data ............................................4
From Tissue Samples to Therapeutic Insight: Data Integrity at Every Step........................................8
Smarter DNA Fragmentation for Enhanced Genome Sequencing........................................................9
Unlocking Precision in WGS Through Better Library Preparation.......................................................12
Resources....................................................................................................................................................16
2 covaris.comForeword
In today’s rapidly advancing world of therapeutic innovation, next-generation sequencing (NGS) sits at the heart of
discovery and development. This powerful technology enables high-throughput, comprehensive analysis of genomic
material for analyzing genetic variations associated with diseases and other biological processes.
High-integrity NGS results – essential for breakthroughs – begin with optimized sample preparation. Any error
introduced in upstream workflows can propagate through sequencing, ultimately affecting the quality and
interpretability of the results. A common source of upstream errors is inconsistent fragmentation, which can lead to
sequence bias and variability.
Adaptive Focused Acoustics® (AFA®) offers a solution to minimize these errors, giving researchers and drug
developers greater confidence in their data and the insights that follow. By delivering precise, reproducible
mechanical fragmentation, AFA eliminates the inconsistencies commonly associated with enzymatic methods.
This eBook explores the importance of data integrity for NGS workflows and highlights how integrating AFA
technology into a purpose-built workflow streamlines processes, accelerates decision making and delivers the
consistency and quality essential for cutting-edge research and therapeutic innovation.Shear Brilliance: Precision Sample Prep
for Trustworthy Genomic Data
Therapeutic innovation depends on the integrity of the
data that informs it. Whether in academia, uncovering
novel mechanisms, or in pharma, validating targets
and biomarkers, every breakthrough starts with
accurate genomic insight. Achieving such quality
begins with optimized sample preparation, which
enables the generation of robust sequencing libraries
that drive discoveries based on the highest-quality
data. However, high-throughput sequencing labs report
failures in the range of 10%, with errors introduced
through various steps of next-generation sequencing
(NGS) workflows, such as sample handling, library
preparation, PCR enrichment and sequencing.1,2
Errors stemming from upstream processes, such as
library preparation, silently degrade data quality in the
early stages of the process, influencing subsequent
downstream applications. However, not all sequencing
libraries are created equal. Various fragmentation
techniques can introduce bias and variability, while
disjointed workflows can result in sample loss, slow
down processes and leave room for error.
This article explores how acoustic shearing
technology, when embedded within a purpose-built,
cohesive workflow ecosystem, can accelerate
therapeutic discoveries. It will examine technology to
achieve precise nucleic acid fragmentation, the
limitations of disjointed approaches, the principles
underlying successful workflow integration and
real-world applications across diverse fields of
biomedical research.
Meeting standards for translational results
Ensuring high-quality DNA library preparation is crucial
for generating the reliable and reproducible results
necessary in translational research. Preparing genetic
material for sequencing on NGS platforms includes
fragmenting the target sequences to a desired length,
producing double-stranded DNA from target
fragments, attaching oligonucleotide adapters to the
ends of target fragments and, finally, quantifying the
final library product for sequencing.3
Rigorous standardization and quality control
throughout the workflow are crucial to meeting the
demands of translational applications to ensure robust
and reproducible results. However, even when
performed by highly skilled personnel, workflows
remain vulnerable to errors introduced through
instrument limitations, multi-step workflows or poor
integration between workflow components.
Precision fragmentation with mechanical shearing
Fragmentation of nucleic acids is the first, and one of
the most critical, steps in NGS library preparation. As
the name suggests, the act of fragmentation breaks
long DNA into shorter segments and can be achieved
via two primary methods: enzymatic digestion and
mechanical shearing. The chosen technique can
influence the resulting level of fragment bias,
reproducibility and uniformity, impacting overall
data quality.
Enzymatic fragmentation uses methods such as
endonuclease digestion and tagmentation. Studies
demonstrate that tagmentation by transposases like
Tn5 may preferentially target lower-GC regions for
cleaving, while specific endonucleases can also
display nucleotide-sequence preferences.4,5 Both
biases lead to non-uniform representation across the
genome.6 Enzyme batch variability further compounds
reproducibility challenges, with fragment size
distributions varying between lots and requiring
optimization for each sample type.5
On the other hand, mechanical shearing encompasses
several physical methods including sonication,
nebulization and acoustic shearing. Adaptive Focused
Acoustics (AFA®) technology delivers controlled
INTRODUCTION
4 covaris.comfragmentation through focused acoustic energy.
Focused ultrasonication disperses mechanical stress
almost uniformly along the DNA backbone, yielding tight
fragment distributions and equal coverage across the
genome.7,8 This approach fragments nucleic acids
through isothermal physical force rather than sequenceand context-dependent enzymatic processes, helping to
minimize fragmentation bias at the source.7
Because fragmentation is governed by precisely
controlled acoustic energy rather than sequencedependent interactions, it produces consistent fragment
size distributions across varying GC content – supporting
the generation of libraries with greater coverage
uniformity. AFA eliminates the need for precise
quantification and normalization of the genetic sample
prior to fragmentation, simplifying workflow execution
and reducing opportunities for variability. For applications
requiring precise quantification, the reproducible nature
of mechanical fragmentation is particularly valuable,
particularly with FFPE and low-input samples.
Fewer failed libraries, lower risk of bias and more rapid
workflows inspire confidence in the first stage of library
prep, which cascades down the entire therapeutic
innovation pipeline, empowering researchers to move
from patient samples to therapeutic insight with
uncompromising data quality.
An integrated workflow for seamless transitions
Though mechanical shearing with AFA Technology can
optimize fragmentation, a chain is only as strong as its
weakest link. In therapeutic innovation, a seamless,
cohesive system expedites workflows and can be the
difference between leading discoveries and
following them.
The hidden cost of disjoined workflows
Many laboratories approach NGS library prep as a
series of independent steps, selecting kits, reagents
and solutions regardless of their ability to seamlessly
interact with each other. While this can be a valid
approach due to preference or availability, it can
introduce unnecessary errors and inefficiencies that
accumulate throughout the workflow.
Sample transfer is a primary source of loss and
contamination, which is especially crucial when
working with limited sample sizes. Transferring
samples into tubes, plates or instruments with
incompatible vessels risks sample loss, which can
mean the difference between successful library
generation and library failure. For challenging sample
types such as formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE)
tissues, which yield fragmented and chemically
modified nucleic acids, workflow inefficiencies become
even more problematic. FFPE samples often exhibit
low library complexity, high duplication rates and
sequencing artifacts that can confound the
identification of single-nucleotide variants.
Using incompatible reagents can also risk mismatched
chemistries, leading to inconsistent reactions. The
cumulative impact of disjointed workflows manifests
as increased sample QC failures, variable library
conversion rates and the need for repeat runs that
consume precious samples and delay timelines. For
translational research where sample material is often
irreplaceable, these inefficiencies translate directly into
lost opportunities for discovery.
The advantages of integration
By ensuring that each solution, kit and shearing
technology component is purpose built and designed
to work harmoniously with the next, a structured,
integrated ecosystem is formed. This approach
reduces sample transfers, loss, reagent waste and
hands-on time while lowering total cost by minimizing
repeat runs. With lower variability and fewer failed
libraries, higher-quality data allows for faster decisions
in therapeutic innovation, which allows for both
confidence and the capability to produce
translational results.
For instance, integrating library preparation reagents
configured for use with mechanical shearing using
AFA technology can streamline the workflow by
reducing the number of processing steps and vessel
transfers. Incorporating fragmentation into a singlevessel workflow helps reduce complexity and
turnaround time in preparing NGS-ready libraries.
5 covaris.comCompared to multi-step workflows, which require
separate quantitation, transfer and qPCR stages that
can take 5 to 6 hours, streamlined approaches reduce
workflow burdens by approximately 40% while
maintaining or improving data quality (Figure 1). This
time saving comes from minimizing sample handling
steps and integrating compatible reagent chemistries
that eliminate unnecessary intermediate purifications.
Not only do time savings allow for more time in other
areas of discovery, but such cohesion helps reduce
opportunities for variability, supporting more
consistent and reproducible results.
Trust your data, drive discovery
Reliable library preparation is essential to widespread
areas of research, including oncology, pathology,
molecular genomics, spatial multiomics and NGS
assay development. Fragmentation strategy plays a
critical role in shaping downstream sequencing
performance, influencing coverage uniformity and
variant detection accuracy. Recent studies have
demonstrated that mechanical fragmentation can
produce more uniform coverage across GC content
compared to enzymatic approaches, reducing
coverage bias and improving the sensitivity of variant
detection.6
Controlled fragmentation approaches are widely
applied across diverse workflows, including spatially
resolved tissue studies, where consistent sample
preparation is essential for accurate downstream
interpretation.9 In these contexts, minimizing variability
introduced during sample processing supports more
reliable comparisons across samples and
experimental conditions.
Conclusion
Trustworthy genomic data underpins every
downstream application, from biomarker identification
to validation. With the pressure to deliver translational
results ever increasing, a purpose-built, integrated
workflow becomes essential – one that works
harmoniously to eliminate gaps in the therapeutic
pipeline. This foundation provides confidence not only
in sample preparation but also ensures that every
downstream stakeholder can rely on the highestquality inputs for their work. When quality goes in,
quality comes out. With the right workflow in place, the
path from data generation to discovery unfolds with
confidence, as each step builds reliably on the last.
Click here to discover Covaris integrated
workflows using AFA® technology.
Figure 1. Demonstrated time savings through integration of AFA fragmentation and optimized library prep workflows.
LIBRARY PREP
WORKFLOWS FROM
OTHER SUPPLIERS
4h 30 min
5h 50 min
2h 30 min
STREAMLINED
WORKFLOW
WITH truCOVER
LIBRARY PREP
Input gDNA Shearing Quantitation Transfer Library Prep Clean-Up Quantitation qPCR
Enzymatic Library Prep Incubation Clean-Up Quantitation qPCR
Input gDNA Fragmentation
AFA Library Prep Clean-Up qPCR
Input gDNA Shearing
6 covaris.comReferences
1. Yang GS, Stott JM, Smailus D, et al. Highthroughput sequencing: a failure mode
analysis. BMC Genomics. 2005;6:2. doi:
10.1186/1471-2164-6-2
2. Ma X, Shao Y, Tian L, et al. Analysis of error
profiles in deep next-generation sequencing
data. Genome Biol. 2019;20:50. doi: 10.1186/
s13059-019-1659-6
3. Head SR, Komori HK, LaMere SA, et al. Library
construction for next-generation sequencing:
overviews and challenges. BioTechniques.
2014;56(2):61–77. doi: 10.2144/000114133
4. Adey A, Morrison HG, Asan, et al. Rapid,
low-input, low-bias construction of shotgun
fragment libraries by high-density in vitro
transposition. Genome Biol. 2010;11:R119. doi:
10.1186/gb-2010-11-12-r119
5. Ribarska T, Bjørnstad PM, Sundaram AYM,
Gilfillan GD. Optimization of enzymatic
fragmentation is crucial to maximize genome
coverage: a comparison of library preparation
methods for Illumina sequencing. BMC
Genomics. 2022;23:92. doi: 10.1186/s12864-
022-08262-0
6. Process V, Ambavaram MMR, Vasantgadkar S,
et al. Optimization of DNA fragmentation
techniques to maximize coverage uniformity
of clinically relevant genes using whole
genome sequencing. Diagnostics.
2025;15(18):2294. doi: 10.3390/
diagnostics15182294
7. Process V, Donaldson J, Khoja H, Durin G,
Laugharn J. Covaris truSHEAR mechanical
DNA shearing for NGS applications. Covaris,
Inc. http://www.covaris.com/wp-content/
uploads/M020033_truSHEARTechNote_RevA.
pdf. Accessed October 28, 2025.
8. DNA shearing for next generation sequencing
(NGS) with the M220 focused-ultrasonicator.
Covaris, Inc. http://www.covaris.com/wpcontent/uploads/M020013.pdf. Accessed
October 28, 2025.
9. Herrera JA, Mallikarjun V, Rosini S, et al. Laser
capture microdissection coupled mass
spectrometry (LCM-MS) for spatially resolved
analysis of formalin-fixed and stained human
lung tissues. Clin Proteomics. 2020;17:24. doi:
10.1186/s12014-020-09287-6
7 covaris.com3. Shearing
Controlled and optimized
fragmentation reduces biased
shearing and produces
uniform coverage.3
From Tissue Samples
to Therapeutic Insight:
Data Integrity at Every Step
Therapeutic innovation depends on the integrity of the data that drives it. Obtaining accurate genomic insights
is essential to transform samples into new therapies. At every stage – from tissue collection and nucleic acid
extraction to sequencing and analysis – maintaining data integrity ensures that the results faithfully reflect
the underlying biology. This infographic highlights how robust next-generation sequencing (NGS) workflows –
grounded in precise and consistent library preparation – deliver reliable, high-quality data that empower confident
discoveries and meaningful advances in patient care.
The journey from sample to therapeutics
The journey from patient tissue to meaningful therapeutic insight follows a complex workflow. It begins with
careful tissue sample preparation and nucleic acid extraction, shearing of DNA and preparation of the library for
sequencing.1 Each of these steps builds the foundation for reliable sequencing and downstream analysis that
powers the development of new therapies.
Why fragmentation matters
Cutting-edge Adaptive Focused Acoustics (AFA) technology uses controlled bursts of focused high-frequency
ultrasound to mechanically process samples efficiently and reproducibly in a non-contact, temperaturecontrolled environment. It works by creating and collapsing tiny, controlled bubbles (cavitation) that generate
localized shear forces to precisely fragment the sample. The mechanical nature of AFA offers consistent,
tunable control of insert sizes, whereas the biochemical nature of enzymatic shearing requires customer
optimization of every workflow.
1. Tissue Samples
Biological starting point.
7. Therapeutic
Discovery
Actionable insights driving
drug development.
2. Extraction
Effective isolation and
extraction of DNA
ensures high yield,
purity and integrity.2
6. Data Analysis
The large dataset
is analyzed using
bioinformatic tools.
5. Sequencing
Data containing the order of
the four bases (A, T, C and
G) in a given nucleic acid
molecule is generated.
4. Library Prep
Library preparation repairs, adapts and
amplifies the DNA to generate sufficient
material for sequencing.
Click here to learn more about efficient and effective library prep.
References:
1. Hess JF, Kohl TA, Kotrová M, et al. Library preparation for next generation sequencing: A review of automation strategies. Biotechnol Adv. 2020; 41:107537. doi: 10.1016/j.
biotechadv.2020.107537
2. Gupta N. DNA extraction and polymerase chain reaction. J Cytol. 2019; 36(2):116–117. doi: 10.4103/JOC.JOC_110_18
3. Process V, Ambavaram MMR, Vasantgadkar S, et al. Optimization of DNA fragmentation techniques to maximize coverage uniformity of clinically relevant genes using whole
genome sequencing. Diagnostics. 2025;15(18):2294. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15182294
AFA Shearing Enzymatic Shearing
Fragmentation
Method
Bias
Acoustic energy —
tunable and controlled
Biochemical activity —
sequence dependent
Bias-free,
uniform, sequenceindependent
GC bias,
uneven coverage
Highly consistent Enzyme batch
variability
Preserved (low input,
FFPE-compatible)
Risk of over-digestion
or loss
Reliable,
high-fidelity data
Variable, often
requires reruns
Seamless Multiple transfers/
vendors
Reproducibility
Sample
Integrity
Outcome
Integration With
FFPE Extraction
and Library
Preparation Steps
Integrating these three solutions
allows you to:
• Streamline workflows
• Reduce QC failures
• Mitigate inter-operator
variability
• Maximize library quality
truXTRAC®
FFPE Extraction
(optional)
AFA® Shearing truCOVER®
Library Prep
Improved input quality
Minimal sample loss
Bias-free fragmentation
Uniform coverage
Integrated design
Reproducible results
The advantages of integrated workflows
Extraction, shearing and library preparation are critical stages for preserving nucleic acid quality prior
to sequencing. Using purpose-built, cohesive tools during these steps enables reliability and brings
control, consistency and integration to the earliest stages of the NGS workflow. This is especially
valuable for challenging, low-input sample types such as FFPE tissues, which contain fragmented and
chemically modified nucleic acids.Smarter DNA Fragmentation for Enhanced
Genome Sequencing
Whole genome sequencing (WGS) enables
comprehensive insight into genetic variation within
both coding and noncoding regions.1 It is widely
applied across research areas such as oncology,
hereditary disease diagnostics and pharmacogenomics.
However, the value of this insight depends on the
accuracy and completeness of the underlying data.
Reliable WGS depends on key performance metrics
such as coverage uniformity, i.e., the consistency of
read depth across regions of interest.2 High and uniform
coverage minimizes false negatives, even in GC-rich or
repetitive sequences, which is crucial for accurate
variant detection and reliable downstream analyses.3
The method used to fragment DNA during library
preparation is key to determining coverage uniformity.
Enzyme-based fragmentation methods often introduce
sequence-dependent biases, such as preferential
cleavage of low-GC regions, producing non-uniform
genome coverage and ultimately reducing variation
detection accuracy.4 Choosing the right DNA
fragmentation method is therefore essential to ensure
high-quality data in downstream analysis.
In a 2025 study, researchers compared sequencing
coverage and variant detection after using enzymatic
fragmentation versus mechanical fragmentation
across various sample types (a reference human cell
line, blood, saliva and FFPE lung tissue).5 The study
compared four PCR-free WGS library preparation kits.
One kit utilized Adaptive Focused Acoustics (AFA)
fragmentation – a type of mechanical fragmentation
by Covaris – while the others used non-mechanical
fragmentation (tagmentation by Supplier I
and enzymatic-based methods by Supplier N and
Supplier W). The libraries were then sequenced using
the Illumina NovaSeq 6000 and each sample was
aligned to the human reference genome. This provided
a standardized framework to evaluate coverage and
sequencing bias across library preparation methods.
AFA fragmentation for unbiased results
The results showed that AFA fragmentation produced
a base composition closely matching the human
genome, indicating minimal bias. On the other hand,
enzymatic-based and tagmentation-based methods
exhibited pronounced base composition biases across
all four bases.
RESEARCH SUMMARY
9 covaris.comOwing to its high consistency, the authors selected a
single library preparation with mechanical
fragmentation to act as a singular benchmark for their
main uniformity of coverage analysis. The study’s
success stems from this controlled experimental
design, which enabled the authors to isolate a
fragmentation method and investigate whether base
bias leads to uneven sequencing coverage across
chromosomes and critical genomic regions
within genes.
Since the authors observed differences in fragmentation
in the sequencing reads, they then explored how these
differences relate to coverage performance across
varying GC-content regions within the human genome.
They discovered that AFA fragmentation achieved the
most uniform coverage across all sample types, while
non-mechanical methods exhibited greater bias in lowand high-GC regions.
Next, they analyzed the impact of GC content on
coverage at the chromosomal level. They found that
AFA fragmentation produced the most consistent
coverage, indicating a reduced GC bias compared to
non-mechanical methods. Similar results were found
for coverage uniformity at the gene level using 504
clinically relevant genes (TSO500 gene set). Thus, the
Covaris library preparation workflow was proven to
ensure more consistent coverage across sample types
at both the chromosome and gene levels.
Better variant performance
As well as coverage analysis, the study evaluated
variant detection accuracy and the impact of reduced
sequencing coverage, focusing on single nucleotide
polymorphisms (SNPs). The results showed that at the
lowest coverage, the truCOVER workflow achieved the
lowest false negative call rate. Supplier I’s workflow
displayed significantly more false positives and
negatives. At higher coverage, variant calling
performance improved across kits, with both
mechanical and enzymatic methods exhibiting low
error rates. However, Supplier I’s workflow continued
to show high false negative and positive rates.
The researchers then assessed variant calling
performance across different GC-content regions of
the human genome. They measured performance for
both SNPs and indels at two reduced sequencing
coverages. At both sequencing coverages, the Covaris
workflow consistently achieved greater accuracy of
SNP detection across a broader range of GC content,
while Supplier I exhibited pronounced GC-dependent
bias, particularly at the lowest coverage. Detection of
indels showed greater variability across all workflows.
Overall, the Covaris library preparation workflow
consistently achieved higher SNP and indel F1 scores
at both coverages across a broader range of GC
content. In contrast, the other workflows showed
mixed results.
Implications for WGS
This innovative study demonstrated that AFA
fragmentation produced more consistent coverage
uniformity across chromosomes and genes than
non-mechanical methods. This led to more reliable
detection of variants, even in challenging samples,
making it potentially advantageous for clinical and
diagnostic applications where DNA integrity is often
compromised. Exploration of the influence of coverage
depth and GC content on variant calling accuracy
revealed that AFA fragmentation showed
comparatively higher accuracy across variable GC
contents, even at lower sequencing depths. Thus,
mechanical DNA shearing with Covaris library
preparation can enhance coverage uniformity with
minimal GC bias across sample types.
This knowledge can be used to inform sequencing
depth estimations, providing practical guidance for
optimizing WGS protocols to achieve consistent gene
representation and reliable variant detection. Extending
this framework to whole-exome and hybrid-capture
sequencing could help address inefficiencies and
coverage gaps in targeted workflows. Moreover,
applying the study’s methodology to large-insert library
construction may aid uniform genome coverage.
These avenues could contribute to improved variant
detection across a wide spectrum of applications.
10 covaris.comReferences
1. Brlek P, Bulić L, Bračić M, et al. Implementing
Whole Genome Sequencing (WGS) in clinical
practice: advantages, challenges, and future
perspectives. Cells. 2024;13(6):504. doi:
10.3390/cells13060504
2. Jennings LJ, Arcila ME, Corless C, et al.
Guidelines for validation of next-Generation
sequencing-based oncology panels: A joint
consensus recommendation of the
Association for Molecular Pathology and
College of American Pathologists. J Mol
Diagn. 2017;19(3):341–365. doi: 10.1016/j.
jmoldx.2017.01.011
3. Zhou C, Dobrinsky J, Tsoi S, et al.
Characterization of the altered gene
expression profile in early porcine embryos
generated from parthenogenesis and somatic
cell chromatin transfer. PLoS ONE.
2014;9(3):e91728. doi: 10.1371/journal.
pone.0091728
4. Adey A, Morrison HG, Asan, et al. Rapid,
low-input, low-bias construction of shotgun
fragment libraries by high-density in vitro
transposition. Genome Biol. 2010;11:R119. doi:
10.1186/gb-2010-11-12-r119
5. Process V, Ambavaram MMR, Vasantgadkar S,
et al. Optimization of DNA fragmentation
techniques to maximize coverage uniformity
of clinically relevant genes using whole
genome sequencing. Diagnostics (Basel).
2025;15(18):2294. doi: 10.3390/
diagnostics15182294
11 covaris.comUnlocking Precision in WGS Through
Better Library Preparation
Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) has revolutionized
the field of genomics, enabling scientists to explore the
complete genetic makeup of individuals with
unprecedented detail. By providing a comprehensive
view of the genome, WGS has become a critical tool in
research, disease diagnosis and personalized medicine.
However, the accuracy of WGS depends not only on the
sequencing technology itself but also on library quality.
In this interview, Greg Endress, Senior Vice President,
Technology & Innovation at Covaris, explains how
emerging tools and methods help researchers improve
library preparation and achieve more accurate
sequencing results.
How are scientists currently using WGS in the
laboratory and clinic?
WGS is currently utilized as an indispensable
methodology in both research and real-world
environments. Within the laboratory setting, it is
fundamental to large-scale population studies, such as
the All of Us Research Program, which seeks to
elucidate the genetic underpinnings of various diseases.
In practice, WGS is not only vital for the diagnosis of
hereditary conditions but is also increasingly integral to
precision oncology, where it facilitates the creation of
detailed tumor-specific genomic profiles. These profiles
provide critical insights that inform tailored therapeutic
strategies, thereby advancing personalized medicine by
translating complex genomic data into
actionable outcomes.
What is the purpose of library preparation in nextgeneration sequencing (NGS) workflows, and what
are the common challenges researchers face during
this process?
The primary purpose of NGS library preparation is to
convert native DNA molecules into a state suitable for
high-throughput sequencing. This intricate, multi-step
process entails the systematic fragmentation of DNA
to a consistent and optimal size, followed by enzymatic
repair of the fragment ends and ligation of unique
adapter sequences. These adapters are essential for
the sequencing instrumentation to properly identify,
cluster and sequence each molecule. A meticulously
executed library preparation protocol is foundational
for ensuring the efficient utilization of the sequencer
and for generating high-quality, accurate data.
A principal challenge inherent to library preparation is
the introduction of methodological variability.
Numerous workflows, particularly those reliant upon
enzymatic fragmentation, are susceptible to
inconsistent DNA fragment sizes, sample-specific
biases and batch-to-batch effects. Such variability can
lead to non-uniform genome coverage and diminished
data quality. As a result, laboratories are often required
to implement labor-intensive and costly quality control
measures. These procedural necessities extend
turnaround times, escalate operational expenditures
and have the potential to compromise the integrity of
the final dataset.
Greg Endress
Senior Vice President, Technology & Innovation, Covaris
INTERVIEW
12 covaris.comWhy is consistent DNA fragmentation important for
sequencing accuracy and data quality, and what
methods have scientists traditionally used to
fragment DNA samples?
Consistent DNA fragmentation is a fundamental
prerequisite for generating high-fidelity sequencing
data. A uniform distribution of fragment sizes ensures
even coverage across the entire genome without
sequence bias, thereby preventing data gaps in regions
of interest. This uniformity is particularly critical for
achieving high-precision variant detection, especially for
the identification of small insertions and deletions that
are often of significant interest in research. Conversely,
inconsistent fragmentation introduces systemic biases
that can confound data interpretation and diminish the
reliability of the results. Ultimately, consistency in
fragmentation enhances the overall efficiency of the
sequencing process and improves data integrity.
Traditionally, scientists have employed either
mechanical shearing or enzymatic digestion to
fragment DNA. While widely used, enzymatic
fragmentation methods present several significant
problems. These approaches are known to introduce
sample-specific biases, particularly in regions with
high GC or AT content, and can suffer from batch-tobatch variability between enzyme lots. This
inconsistency leads to variable fragment sizes and
lower library conversion rates, resulting in extensive
and costly quality control procedures to ensure data
integrity. Such issues compromise the reproducibility
of experiments and can skew the final
sequencing results.
What innovative library preparation kits are helping
researchers overcome the common WGS challenges?
The Covaris truCOVER® WGS PCR-free Library Prep Kit
represents a comprehensive, integrated solution
engineered to mitigate the principal challenges
associated with library preparation. It uniquely
combines the proprietary AFA technology, which
provides superior mechanical DNA shearing, with a
highly efficient, single-vessel workflow. This synergy
yields consistently sized DNA fragments and
maximizes the conversion efficiency of DNA into
sequence-ready libraries. Consequently, the kit
facilitates reliable mass-based library pooling, often
obviating the need for qPCR, while reducing
turnaround time by as much as 30% and ensuring the
generation of high-quality data from diverse
sample types.
The truCOVER Amplification Kit is an ancillary module
designed for NGS library preparation involving lowinput DNA samples, typically ranging from 0.1 to 50
nanograms. Its primary function is to increase the
quantity of library DNA to a level sufficient for
sequencing, which is critical when working with
precious or limited starting material from sources
such as formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues.
Covaris engineered the kit to perform this amplification
with minimal bias, ensuring that the resulting data
accurately reflects the original sample’s genomic
profile without skewing due to factors such as GC
content. This enables researchers to obtain highquality sequencing data from challenging samples.
What is AFA, and what are the advantages of using
this technology for DNA fragmentation?
AFA is a proprietary Covaris technology that enables
highly precise and reproducible mechanical DNA
shearing. The technology utilizes controlled bursts of
high-frequency acoustic energy focused into a discrete
zone within the sample vessel (Figure 1). This noncontact process creates controlled cavitation, resulting
in hydrodynamic shear forces that fragment
biomolecules. Because the fragmentation process is
highly controlled, AFA delivers exceptional precision
and reproducibility, yielding a tight and uniform
fragment size distribution.
Unlike enzymatic methods, AFA is an unbiased
physical process, preventing fragmentation
preferences in GC- or AT-rich genomic regions and
eliminating batch-to-batch variability. This process
enhances data integrity and ensures more uniform
genome coverage. The controlled, non-contact nature
of AFA also improves workflow robustness across
diverse sample types, solidifying its status as the gold
standard for high-quality DNA fragmentation.
13 covaris.comWhat are the benefits of using the truCOVER Library
Prep Kits over other library preparation methods?
The truCOVER Library Prep Kits provide several distinct
advantages over alternative methods. First, by
employing AFA technology, they facilitate unbiased
and highly reproducible DNA fragmentation, resulting
in more uniform genomic coverage and higher
confidence in variant calling. Second, the streamlined,
single-vessel workflow is designed to minimize sample
transfers and manual intervention, which contributes
to a reduction in overall turnaround time and avoids
sample loss. Finally, the combination of higher library
conversion efficiency and exceptional consistency
enables accurate mass-based pooling, which
frequently eliminates the requirement for expensive
qPCR-based quantification and thus lowers the total
per-sample cost.
How might innovations like these kits affect the
future of genomics research and personalized
medicine?
Innovations such as the truCOVER kits serve as
catalysts for the advancement of genomics research
and personalized medicine. By alleviating critical
bottlenecks related to time, cost and methodological
variability, these technologies enhance the
accessibility and scalability of high-quality WGS. The
resulting standardization is crucial for conducting
robust, large-scale population studies and for the
reliable detection of clinically significant variants. By
providing a more rapid and cost-effective pathway to
high-confidence data, this technology empowers
researchers and clinicians to more effectively translate
genomic information into actionable insights that drive
better outcomes.
Optimized
Consumables
Sensors
Focused
Acoustics
Controlled
Enviroment
Control
- Intensity
- Cycles
- Time
Adaptive
Energy Input
Computer
Control
Duty Factor
Cycles per Burst
x
x
x
x
Figure 1. Adaptive Focused Acoustics® (AFA®) technology uses precise high-frequency
acoustic energy to efficiently and consistently fragment DNA, ensuring uniform shearing for
high-quality results.
14 covaris.comFinally, the library prep
you deserve.
Improved performance, simpler
workflow, lower cost per sample—
truCOVER® Library Prep.
Purpose-built to leverage Covaris gold standard ultrasonication technology,
truCOVER® Library Prep transforms WGS sample prep into a streamlined,
high-precision process that enhances data quality from the very start.
truCOVER Library Prep streamlines your sequencing workflow with:
Create robust, reproducible libraries in less time from a variety of sample
types, including FFPE, blood, and saliva. With truCOVER Library Prep,
every decision, every discovery, and every breakthrough begins with
confidence.
Discover how truCOVER® Library Prep - Powered by Adaptive Focused
Acoustics® (AFA®) - Advances the Accuracy of your NGS Data
Learn more at covaris.com/trucover-dna-library-prep-kits
Higher Variant
Calling Accuracy
Uniform,Unbiased
Coverage
High Coverage
& Complexity
Efficient &
Scalable Workflow
Robust Performance
for Low Input &
All Sample Types
Reduced fragmentation bias enables more accurate variant detection
Consistent fragment size distribution supports reliable calling
Minimizes sequence- and GC-dependent fragmentation bias
Enables more even representation across the genome
2X higher library conversation vs. competitor with same input DNA
Consistently higher depth of coverage and 30–50% greater complexity
Standardized workflow 30% faster turnaround time
Pooling by mass or equal volume without qPCR quantification
High quality from even 1 ng FFPE DNA or 0.1 ng high-quality DNA
All sample types - blood, saliva, FFPE, cell culture & microbial DNAResources
In a recent webinar, Lia Abarzua, Sr. Applications Scientist at Covaris, discussed
how the truCOVER® WGS library prep kit portfolio can help you to streamline
DNA library preparation for next-generation sequencing.
Watch the webinar here
Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) samples are an invaluable resource
for clinical research; however, their fixation process is known to severely damage
DNA. Covaris integrated workflow provides a robust solution consolidating the
most critical steps into a single, highly reproducible system.
Download this technical note to learn more
Whole-genome sequencing requires a robust method for generating high-quality
libraries. The truCOVER Library Prep Kit, enabled by AFA technology, ensures
versatile, consistent performance across multiple sample types.
Download this application note to learn more
16 covaris.comThe ability to perform WGS from samples with limited DNA input remains a
significant challenge in genomic research. The truCOVER workflow solves this
problem generating high-quality libraries from low-input DNA samples.
Download this technical note to learn more
Library pooling for NGS can be expensive and time consuming. The truCOVER
WGS PCR-free Library Prep Kit significantly reduces hands-on laboratory time,
lowers operational costs, and consistently delivers high-quality
sequencing results.
Download this technical note to learn more
Extend Your NGS Workflow to the Transcriptome
Degraded FFPE RNA shouldn’t stand between you and actionable transcriptomic
data. Discover how truCOVER Total RNA Library Prep delivers consistent,
high-quality WTS results in under 4 hours with 100% gene fusion detection
sensitivity from even highly degraded RNA.
Download this technical note to learn more
17 covaris.com
Brought to you by
Download the eBook for FREE Now!
Information you provide will be shared with the sponsors for this content. Technology Networks or its sponsors may contact you to offer you content or products based on your interest in this topic. You may opt-out at any time.
Experiencing issues viewing the form? Click here to access an alternate version