Fully Automated Algorithm for NGS-Based Clonality Testing
Complete the form below to unlock access to ALL audio articles.
B and T cells undergo random recombination of the VH/DH/JH portions of the immunoglobulin loci (B cell) and T-cell receptors before becoming functional cells. When one V-J rearrangement is over-represented in a population of B or T cells indicating an origin from a single cell, this indicates a clonal process. Clonality aids in the diagnosis and monitoring of lymphoproliferative disorders and evaluation of disease recurrence.
Want more breaking news?
Subscribe to Technology Networks’ daily newsletter, delivering breaking science news straight to your inbox every day.Subscribe for FREE
In a new study, researchers Sean T. Glenn, Phillip M. Galbo Jr., Jesse D. Luce, Kiersten Marie Miles, Prashant K. Singh, Manuel J. Glynias, and Carl Morrison from Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center aimed to develop objective criteria, which can be automated, to classify B and T cell clonality results as positive (clonal), No evidence of clonality, or invalid (failed).
“Using clinical samples with 'gold standard' clonality data obtained using PCR/CE testing, we ran NGS-based amplicon clonality assays and developed our own model for clonality reporting.”
To assess the performance of their model, the researchers analyzed the NGS results across other published models. Their model for clonality calling using NGS-based technology increases the assay’s sensitivity, more accurately detecting clonality. In addition, they built a computational pipeline to use their model to objectively call clonality in an automated fashion.
“Collectively the results outlined below will have a direct clinical impact by expediting the review and sign-out process for concise clonality reporting.”
Reference: Glenn S. T., Galbo Jr. P. M., Luce J. D., Miles K. Marie, Singh P. K., Glynias M. J., Morrison C. Development and implementation of an automated and highly accurate reporting process for NGS-based clonality testing. Oncotarget. 2023; 14: 450-461. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.28429
This article has been republished from the following materials. Note: material may have been edited for length and content. For further information, please contact the cited source.