We've updated our Privacy Policy to make it clearer how we use your personal data. We use cookies to provide you with a better experience. You can read our Cookie Policy here.


Gene Mutations That Promote Reproduction Tend To Shorten Lifespan

Double helix structure of DNA.
Credit: iStock.
Listen with
Register for free to listen to this article
Thank you. Listen to this article using the player above.

Want to listen to this article for FREE?

Complete the form below to unlock access to ALL audio articles.

Read time: 3 minutes

A University of Michigan-led study based on a review of genetic and health information from more than 276,000 people finds strong support for a decades-old evolutionary theory that sought to explain aging and senescence.

In 1957, evolutionary biologist George Williams proposed that genetic mutations that contribute to aging could be favored by natural selection if they are advantageous early in life in promoting earlier reproduction or the production of more offspring. Williams was an assistant professor at Michigan State University at the time.

Williams’ idea, now known as the antagonistic pleiotropy theory of aging, remains the prevailing evolutionary explanation of senescence, the process of becoming old or aging. While the theory is supported by individual case studies, it has lacked unambiguous genome-wide evidence.

Want more breaking news?

Subscribe to Technology Networks’ daily newsletter, delivering breaking science news straight to your inbox every day.

Subscribe for FREE

In the new study, scheduled for publication Dec. 8 in Science Advances, U-M evolutionary biologist Jianzhi Zhang and a Chinese colleague tested the Williams hypothesis using genetic, reproductive and death-registry information from 276,406 participants in the United Kingdom’s Biobank database.

They found reproduction and lifespan to be genetically strongly negatively correlated, meaning that genetic mutations that promote reproduction tend to shorten lifespan.

In addition, individuals carrying mutations that predispose them to relatively high reproductive rates have lower probabilities of living to age 76 than those carrying mutations that predispose them to relatively low reproductive rates, according to the study.

However, the authors caution that reproduction and lifespan are affected by both genes and the environment. And compared with environmental factors—including the impacts of contraception and abortion on reproduction and medical advances on lifespan—the genetic factors discussed in the study play a relatively minor role, according to the authors.

“These results provide strong support for the Williams hypothesis that aging arises as a byproduct of natural selection for earlier and more reproduction. Natural selection cares little about how long we live after the completion of reproduction, because our fitness is largely set by the end of reproduction,” said Zhang, the Marshall W. Nirenberg Collegiate Professor in the U-M Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology.

Fitness is a concept biologists use to describe the degree to which an organism’s characteristics increase its number of offspring.

“Interestingly, we found that when you control for the genetically predicted amount and timing of reproduction, having two kids corresponds to the longest lifespan,” Zhang said. “Having fewer or more kids both lower the lifespan.” That result supports the findings of several previous studies.

Zhang’s co-author on the Science Advances paper is Erping Long of the Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College. Long was a visiting student at U-M when the study began.

In genetics, the concept of pleiotropy posits that a single mutation can influence multiple traits. The idea that the same mutation can be both beneficial and harmful, depending on the situation, is known as antagonistic pleiotropy and was proposed by Williams to underlie the origin of aging in a paper titled “Pleiotropy, natural selection, and the evolution of senescence.”

To a biologist, senescence refers specifically to a gradual decline of bodily functions that manifests as a decline in reproductive performance and an increase in the death rate with age.

The U.K.’s Biobank database enabled Zhang and Long to assess the genetic relationship between reproduction and lifespan at the genomic scale.

The researchers examined the frequency of 583 reproduction-associated genetic variants in the database and found that several of the variants associated with higher reproduction have become more common in recent decades, despite their simultaneous associations with shorter lifespan. The increased frequency of the variants is presumably a result of natural selection for higher reproduction.

“The antagonistic pleiotropy hypothesis predicts that most mutations that increase reproduction but reduce lifespan have larger fitness advantages than disadvantages so are selectively favored,” Zhang said.

Even so, human life expectancy, birth rate and reproductive behavior have all changed drastically in the last few decades. Specifically, more than half of humans live in areas of the world where birth rates have declined, along with increased incidences of contraception, abortion and reproductive disorder, according to the new study.

Global human life expectancy at birth, on the other hand, has steadily increased from 46.5 years in 1950 to 72.8 years in 2019.

“These trends are primarily driven by substantial environmental shifts, including changes in lifestyles and technologies, and are opposite to the changes caused by natural selection of the genetic variants identified in this study,” Zhang said. “This contrast indicates that, compared with environmental factors, genetic factors play a minor role in the human phenotypic changes studied here.”

Reference: Long E, Zhang J. Evidence for the role of selection for reproductively advantageous alleles in human aging. Sci Adv. 2023;9(49):eadh4990. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.adh4990

This article has been republished from the following materials. Note: material may have been edited for length and content. For further information, please contact the cited source.