We've updated our Privacy Policy to make it clearer how we use your personal data.

We use cookies to provide you with a better experience. You can read our Cookie Policy here.

Advertisement
Is the German Suspension of MON810 Maize Cultivation Scientifically Justified?
News

Is the German Suspension of MON810 Maize Cultivation Scientifically Justified?

Is the German Suspension of MON810 Maize Cultivation Scientifically Justified?
News

Is the German Suspension of MON810 Maize Cultivation Scientifically Justified?

Read time:
 

Want a FREE PDF version of This News Story?

Complete the form below and we will email you a PDF version of "Is the German Suspension of MON810 Maize Cultivation Scientifically Justified?"

First Name*
Last Name*
Email Address*
Country*
Company Type*
Job Function*
Would you like to receive further email communication from Technology Networks?

Technology Networks Ltd. needs the contact information you provide to us to contact you about our products and services. You may unsubscribe from these communications at any time. For information on how to unsubscribe, as well as our privacy practices and commitment to protecting your privacy, check out our Privacy Policy



- Agnès Ricroch, Jean Baptiste Bergé and Marcel Kuntz, Transgenic Research, Vol. 19, No. 1, Feb. 2010

Abstract  We examined the justifications invoked by the German government in April 2009 to suspend the cultivation of the genetically modified maize varieties containing the Bt insect-resistance trait MON810. We have carried out a critical examination of the alleged new data on a potential environmental impact of these varieties, namely two scientific papers describing laboratory force-feeding trials on ladybirds and daphnia, and previous data on Lepidoptera, aquatic and soil organisms.

We demonstrate that the suspension is based on an incomplete list of references, ignores the widely admitted case-by-case approach, and confuses potential hazard and proven risk in the scientific procedure of risk assessment. Furthermore, we did not find any justification for this suspension in our extensive survey of the scientific literature regarding possible effects under natural field conditions on non-target animals.

The vast majority of the 41 articles published in 2008 and 2009 indicate no impact on these organisms and only two articles indicate a minor effect, which is either inconsistent during the planting season or represents an indirect effect. Publications from 1996 to 2008 (376 publications) and recent meta-analyses do not allow to conclude on consistent effects either. The lower abundance of some insects concerns mainly specialized enemies of the target pest (an expected consequence of its control by Bt maize). On the contrary, Bt maize have generally a lower impact than insecticide treatment.

The present review demonstrates that the available meta-knowledge on Cry1Ab expressing maize was ignored by the German government which instead used selected individual studies.

( Université Paris; INRA-Sophia Antipolis, & Laboratory Physiologie Cellulaire Végétale - France)
Advertisement