New Way to Control Protein Activity could Lead to Cancer Therapies, Stanford Study Shows
News Sep 30, 2008
Investigators at the Stanford University School of Medicine have found a way to quickly and reversibly fine-tune the activity of individual proteins in cells and living mammals, providing a new laboratory tool for identifying - more precisely than ever before - the functions of different proteins.
The new technique also could help to speed the development of therapies in which cancer-fighting proteins are selectively delivered to tumors.
The procedure, described in a Nature Medicine paper published online Sept. 28, appears to be broadly applicable to efforts to understand the biological roles of all kinds of proteins, including those that are secreted by cells. This category includes many potent intercellular signaling proteins that can influence the immune system, for example by attracting its attention to an existing tumor.
“We have yet to find a protein the system doesn’t work with,” said senior author Steve Thorne, PhD, an assistant professor at the University of Pittsburgh who was involved in the work while a research associate at Stanford. The work was conducted under the direction of Chris Contag, PhD, associate professor of pediatrics, of radiology and of microbiology and immunology; and Tom Wandless, PhD, assistant professor of chemical and systems biology.
This technique, which was tested in mice, involves pairing specially bioengineered proteins with a drug, aptly named Shield-1, that prevents the proteins from being degraded.
This approach stands in contrast to current ways of learning about proteins’ functions, which are largely based on impeding a cell’s production of the protein. Unfortunately, that cellular process can be slow and cumbersome, meaning that scientists get a sluggish response to such manipulations.
In addition, current methods to perturb protein function are either irreversible - once a protein’s production is knocked out, it can’t be turned back on - or difficult to execute.
The new technique, instead, influences the level of speed with which the protein is broken down-a much faster process than its production. Moreover, it is reversible and works like a dimmer switch for an overhead light. The rate of a protein’s degradation - and, thus, the level of its biological activity - can be increased or decreased by supplying more or less of Shield-1, permitting scientists to study the biological effects of slightly increasing or diminishing a protein’s activity inside a cell over short time frames: for example, during a particular period in an organism’s development.
The Stanford team succeeded in controlling levels of proteins by a relatively simple method pioneered by Wandless and his then-graduate student, Laura Banaszynski, PhD. They created special, bioengineered versions of several different proteins, in each case altering the protein by adding a small extra piece that didn’t interfere with its biological function, but flagged it for rapid degradation.
This degradation can be halted in its tracks, however, by Shield-1, which binds to the bioengineered protein, shielding it from destruction by the cell’s breakdown machinery. The drug thus can enhance the bioengineered protein’s intracellular concentration and activity; withdrawing the drug has the opposite effect.
“The process is tunable, and fast. As soon as you remove the drug, you affect the degradation time of the protein,” said Mark Sellmyer, a graduate student at the School of Medicine, who shares lead authorship of the study with Banaszynski.
The degradation-vulnerable bioengineered proteins were each produced by attaching the gene coding for a protein to another DNA sequence coding for the small extra piece that flags the protein for rapid degradation. The scientists then inserted the altered gene into a virus capable of infecting cells and introducing the altered gene into the cells’ genomes.
Previous work by the International Multiple Sclerosis Genetics Consortium (IMSGC) has identified 233 genetic risk variants. However, these only account for about 20% of overall disease risk, with the remaining genetic culprits proving elusive. A new study has tracked down four of these hard-to-find genes.READ MORE
2nd AI Pharma Innovation: Drug Discovery 2019 Summit
Feb 27 - Feb 28, 2019
5th International Congress on Epigenetics & Chromatin
Aug 22 - Aug 23, 2019
14th World Congress on Medicinal Chemistry and Drug Design
Jun 10 - Jun 11, 2019
International Conference on e-Health and Healthcare Innovations
May 08 - May 09, 2019