We've updated our Privacy Policy to make it clearer how we use your personal data.

We use cookies to provide you with a better experience. You can read our Cookie Policy here.

Advertisement
Rectangle Image
News

Sequencing Shows How Evolution Can Undermine Bioprocess Commercialization

Rectangle Image
News

Sequencing Shows How Evolution Can Undermine Bioprocess Commercialization

Credit: Boesen Photography & Design/boesenfoto.dk via DTU
Read time:
 

The transition towards sustainable biobased chemical production is important for green growth, but productivity and yield of engineered cells frequently decrease in large industry-scale fermentation. This barrier to commercialization of more bioprocesses is largely ascribed to the physical inefficacies of large cubic-meter steel tanks. 


Bioengineers have long debated whether it was realistic for evolution to eliminate production of engineered production cells during the relatively short time courses of large industrial-scale production. 


According to a new study published in Nature Communications, the role of evolution has been underestimated in limiting bioprocesses. 


“Using a new ultra-deep DNA-sequencing approach, we found that evolution constrains bioproduction. We can use this insight to redesign our cell factories to produce more efficiently at industrial large-scale,” says Morten Sommer, Professor and Scientific Director of the Bacterial Synthetic Biology section at the Novo Nordisk Foundation Center for Biosustainability, DTU.


Detrimental evolution underestimated

The study from the Novo Nordisk Foundation Center for Biosustainability suggests that the mechanisms of evolution are constraining the scale-up by a variety of mutations wider and faster than previously expected. 


"Using a new ultra-deep DNA-sequencing approach, we found that evolution constrains bioproduction. We can use this insight to redesign our cell factories to produce more efficiently at industrial large-scale"


Findings indicate that evolution is a more important threat to scale-up, and it cannot be ruled out that it limits the efficiency of commercialized large-scale fermentation. 


“Evolution of non-productive cell subpopulations leads to loss of production in our case studies. The speed of evolution depends on the biochemical product, but it can definitely happen within industrial time-scales. This makes it difficult to scale-up biobased processes,” says Peter Rugbjerg, Postdoc at the Novo Nordisk Foundation Center for Biosustainability. 


Nevertheless, by using ultra-deep sequencing of thousands of different cells, it is now possible to score the different error modes of scale-up and design against evolution earlier.


The researchers are now validating their bioinformatics approach and testing how widespread the problem is in actual industry by collaborating with fermentation companies. 


Early evolution determined the long-term fate at scale

Results hint that engineered production genes in chemical producing bacteria were mainly mutated by non-expected disruptions and genetic rearrangements, rather than the slower, classical point mutations known as single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). The mutations make the nonproducing cells more fit in the competition for nutrients of a fermentation tank.


“We discovered that a wide diversity of genetic disruptions turned producing cells into nonproducing when we deep-sequenced thousands of production organisms over time. Cells have many build-in ways to remove unneeded genes, and it turned out the most important are overlooked in standard analysis tools,” says Peter Rugbjerg, Postdoc at the Novo Nordisk Foundation Center for Biosustainability.


The evolutionary mutants that eventually led to complete loss of production could be detected very early at frequencies below 0.1 %, which may permit future identification of failing fermentations earlier. 


Residing at ultra-low frequency when grown in the laboratory, the mutants played no negative role on production in shake flasks and were traditionally difficult to detect. However, the advantage of lost production means these early mutations had already determined the magnitude of production decline that happens as the process is scaled up to industrial growth durations.


“Based on these findings I would encourage companies running industrial scale fermentations to deploy deep sequencing of the fermentation populations to assess the extent of detrimental evolution,” says Morten Sommer.


He expects that addressing this detrimental evolution would substantially improve commercial bioprocesses.


This article has been republished from materials provided by the Technical University of Denmark. Note: material may have been edited for length and content. For further information, please contact the cited source.
Advertisement