We've updated our Privacy Policy to make it clearer how we use your personal data.

We use cookies to provide you with a better experience. You can read our Cookie Policy here.

Advertisement
Past Infection Doesn't Mean Young People Won't Get COVID-19 Again
News

Past Infection Doesn't Mean Young People Won't Get COVID-19 Again

Past Infection Doesn't Mean Young People Won't Get COVID-19 Again
News

Past Infection Doesn't Mean Young People Won't Get COVID-19 Again

Credit: Pixabay.
Read time:
 

Want a FREE PDF version of This News Story?

Complete the form below and we will email you a PDF version of "Past Infection Doesn't Mean Young People Won't Get COVID-19 Again"

First Name*
Last Name*
Email Address*
Country*
Company Type*
Job Function*
Would you like to receive further email communication from Technology Networks?

Technology Networks Ltd. needs the contact information you provide to us to contact you about our products and services. You may unsubscribe from these communications at any time. For information on how to unsubscribe, as well as our privacy practices and commitment to protecting your privacy, check out our Privacy Policy

Antibodies induced by infection with SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19, do not completely protect young people against reinfection, as evidenced through a study of more than 3,000 young, healthy members of the U.S. Marine Corps conducted by researchers at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai and the Naval Medical Research Center, published Thursday, April 15, in The Lancet Respiratory Medicine.

“Our findings indicate that reinfection by SARS-CoV-2 in healthy young adults is common,” says Stuart Sealfon, MD, the Sara B. and Seth M. Glickenhaus Professor of Neurology at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai and senior author of the paper. “Despite a prior COVID-19 infection, young people can catch the virus again and may still transmit it to others. This is an important point to know and remember as vaccine rollouts continue. Young people should get the vaccine whenever possible, since vaccination is necessary to boost immune responses, prevent reinfection, and reduce transmission.”


The longitudinal, prospective study, conducted between May and November 2020, found that nearly half of the Marines who had not previously experienced SARS-CoV-2 infection tested positive at some point during the period. But so did 10 percent of participants who had previously been infected with SARS-CoV-2, indicating that they are still at risk of reinfection, even though the risk is lower in that group.


The study population consisted of 3,249 predominantly male, 18-20-year-old Marine recruits who, upon arrival at a Marine-supervised two-week quarantine prior to entering basic training, were tested for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies. This showed whether they had been infected sometime in the past (“seropositive”) before arrival at the Marine base.


At the beginning, middle, and end of the quarantine period, they were also tested for active SARS-CoV-2 infection using polymerase chain reaction (PCR), the standard and very accurate testing mode that shows whether a person is currently infected. Those who tested positive during the quarantine period were excluded from the study. Once the Marines left quarantine and entered basic training, they were tested for infection three times a week by PCR for the duration of the study.


Recruits who tested positive for a new COVID-19 infection during the study were isolated and the study team followed up with additional testing. Levels of neutralizing antibodies were also taken from subsequently infected seropositive and selected seropositive participants who were not reinfected during the study period.


Of the 2,346 Marines followed long enough for this analysis of reinfection rate, 189 were seropositive and 2,247 were seronegative at the start of the study. Across both groups of recruits, there were 1,098 (45 percent) new infections during the study. Among the seropositive participants, 19 (10 percent) tested positive for a second infection during the study. Of the recruits who were seronegative, 1,079 (48 percent) became infected during the study.


To understand why these reinfections occurred, the authors studied the reinfected and not-infected participants’ antibody responses. They found that, among the seropositive group, participants who became reinfected had lower antibody levels than those who did not become reinfected


Comparing new infections between seropositive and seronegative participants, the authors found that viral load (the amount of measurable SARS-CoV-2 virus) in reinfected seropositive recruits was on average only 10 times lower than in infected seronegative participants, which could mean that some reinfected individuals could still have a capacity to transmit infection. The authors note that this will need further investigation.


In the study, most of the new COVID-19 cases in the Marines were asymptomatic or only mildly symptomatic—84 percent (16 out of 19 participants) in the seropositive group and 68 percent (732 out of 1,079 participants) in the seronegative group—and none required hospitalization.


The authors note some limitations to their study, including that it likely underestimates the risk of reinfection in previously infected individuals because it does not account for people with very low antibody levels following their past infection. They strongly suggest that even young people with previous SARS-CoV-2 infection be a target of vaccination since efforts must be made to prevent transmission and prevent infection amongst this group.

Reference
Letizia A G et al. SARS-CoV-2 seropositivity and subsequent infection risk in healthy young adults: a prospective cohort study. Lancet Respir. Med. April 15, 2021. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-2600(21)00158-2

This article has been republished from the following materials. Note: material may have been edited for length and content. For further information, please contact the cited source.

Advertisement