Make or Buy: A Strategic Decision for Lab Automation Instruments
Whitepaper
Last Updated: August 12, 2024
(+ more)
Published: July 30, 2024
Credit: Tecan
Laboratory automation is transforming the diagnostics industry, enhancing efficiency, accuracy and scalability.
However, diagnostic companies face the strategic choice of developing automation instruments in-house or outsourcing to a trusted OEM partner. Evaluating the benefits and trade-offs of each approach is essential to make a decision that optimizes operations and drives growth.
This whitepaper provides a comprehensive framework to guide this critical decision, examining cost, expertise and time-to-market.
Download this whitepaper to discover:
- Advantages and disadvantages of in-house development and outsourcing
- All the factors to consider when choosing between in-house development and outsourcing
- Practical steps to mitigate risks and enhance collaboration with external partners
WHITE PAPER
MAKE OR BUY:
A STRATEGIC DECISION
FOR LABORATORY
AUTOMATION
INSTRUMENTS.
2
INTRODUCTION.
The diagnostics industry is experiencing rapid growth
and transformation, and automation plays a pivotal
role in enhancing laboratory efficiency, accuracy and
quality, while also enabling easier scaling of diagnostic
testing. In this changing landscape, it is imperative for
diagnostics companies to carefully evaluate whether
to develop laboratory automation instruments inhouse, or to leverage external expertise by purchasing
them. Strategic decision-making requires careful
consideration of all the benefits and trade-offs
associated with the ‘make or buy’ decision.
This whitepaper aims to guide commercial leaders in
diagnostics companies in making informed choices
between in-house development and outsourcing
when it comes to laboratory automation instruments.
The paper analyzes the advantages and disadvantages
of both approaches, and provides a comprehensive
framework to aid decision-making, looking at factors
such as cost, expertise, time-to-market and strategic
alignment. By understanding the implications of each
option, businesses can make well-informed decisions
that optimize their operations and drive business
growth.
1
Evaluate market landscape
2
Define strategic objectives
3
Analyze time-to-market and resources
4
Assess internal capabilities
5
Consider intellectual property
6
Conduct cost-benefit analysis
7
Mitigate risks
8
Stay flexible and agile
9
Optimize collaboration
10
Monitor continously
‘Make or buy’ strategic assessment.
3
ADVANTAGES.
• Control and customization:
Developing laboratory automation instruments
in-house offers diagnostics companies full
control of the design and customization, so
that they can align instrument specifications
precisely with their unique needs and workflow
requirements.
• Flexible cost allocation:
Keeping the development of an automation
instrument in-house allows more flexibility
in allocating costs, based on the individual
requirements of each project.
• Change management: Developing instruments
in-house with internal stakeholders may simplify
change management if project scopes alter
during product development.
POINTS TO CONSIDER.
• Resource intensive:
Developing laboratory automation instruments
in-house requires a significant investment in
skilled personnel, research and development and
infrastructure, as well as ongoing maintenance
and support.
• Time-to-market:
Manufacturing complex laboratory automation
instruments in-house can be time-consuming,
potentially delaying market entry and diminishing
any competitive advantages associated with
rapid production.
• Opportunity costs:
Allocating internal resources to in-house
development may divert attention from core
competencies and other strategic initiatives.
ADVANTAGES.
• Access to expertise:
Collaborating with an original equipment
manufacturer (OEM) grants diagnostics
companies access to their automation expertise
and experience, to produce instruments that
incorporate cutting-edge technologies and are
guided by industry best practices.
• Time and cost efficient:
Developing laboratory automation instruments
with established OEM partners can expedite timeto-market and lower the cost of ownership of the
solution, as an OEM will already have existing
infrastructure and digital support tools in place.
• Scalability and flexibility:
Outsourcing provides the flexibility to adapt
to evolving market demands, leveraging the
OEM partner’s ability to scale the production of
instruments up and down.
• Highest quality and reliability:
Working with an OEM partner supports the highest
levels of product quality, as they will already have
rigorous quality checks and well-established
quality management systems (QMSs) in place.
POINTS TO CONSIDER.
• Dependency on suppliers:
Relying on poorly selected external partners
can entail potential risks, such as quality control,
supplier reliability and possible limitations in
customization.
• Intellectual property concerns:
Outsourcing may involve licensing agreements
or shared intellectual property, potentially
limiting the exclusivity of new instruments and
the resulting competitive advantage.
• Strategic alignment:
Selecting a suitable OEM partner requires careful
evaluation of the compatibility between the
proposed solution roadmap and the outsourcing
company’s long-term strategic objectives.
OPTION 1:
‘MAKE’ – IN-HOUSE DEVELOPMENT.
OPTION 2:
‘BUY’ – OUTSOURCING
AUTOMATION DEVELOPMENT.
4
STRATEGIC FRAMEWORK FOR THE ‘MAKE OR BUY’ DECISION.
The following framework highlights all the factors to consider when choosing between developing laboratory
automation instruments in-house or outsourcing them. The purpose of the framework is to help business
unit leaders in diagnostics companies make informed ‘make or buy’ decisions regarding the development
of laboratory automation. In turn, this will enable them to optimize their company’s resources, accelerate
innovation and enhance their competitive position in the market.
Evaluate the market availability of both options
• Research and evaluate the availability of laboratory
automation systems in the market, including offthe-shelf solutions and potential partnerships with
technology providers.
• Assess the scalability, reliability and compatibility of
existing solutions with respect to your company’s
specific requirements.
• Consider the time-to-market advantage and potential
risks associated with buying instruments or partnering
with external vendors.
Define the company’s strategic objectives
• Clearly define the strategic objectives and long-term
goals of your company in the context of laboratory
automation development.
• Determine the specific benefits and competitive
advantages that you aim to achieve through laboratory
automation.
• Align your company’s strategic objectives with its
overall business strategy and vision.
Analyze implementation time and resources
• Consider the time required for developing automation
systems internally versus the implementation time
associated with external development.
• Assess the availability of resources – including skilled
personnel, infrastructure and project management
capabilities – required for successful implementation.
Assess the available internal capabilities and resources
• Evaluate your company’s existing internal capabilities,
expertise and resources in laboratory automation
development.
• Identify your core competencies, and determine
if they align with the requirements of developing
laboratory automation systems.
• Assess your company’s technological infrastructure,
research and development capabilities, and talent
pool in relevant areas such as robotics, software
development and engineering.
Consider intellectual property
• Evaluate the potential impact of both options on your
company’s intellectual property (IP) rights and trade
secrets.
• Assess whether developing automation internally
allows better protection of proprietary technologies,
or if partnering poses minimal risk to IP.
Conduct a cost-benefit analysis
• Analyze the financial implications of developing
laboratory automation systems internally versus
outsourcing to an OEM partner.
• Consider factors such as total cost of ownership and
potential return on investment.
Mitigate risks
• Identify potential risks and challenges associated with
both the ‘make’ and ‘buy’ options.
• Evaluate the risks associated with developing
automation systems internally, such as delays,
resource constraints and technological uncertainties.
• Assess the risks associated with external sourcing,
including vendor reliability and long-term support
Flexibility and agility
• Maintain flexibility and adaptability in the decisionmaking process.
• Monitor industry trends and emerging technologies
to identify opportunities for innovation or potential
disruptions.
• Adjust your strategic approach as needed, to ensure
that your company remains competitive and is always
Optimize collaboration
• If you decide to partner with external vendors, identify
key criteria for selecting the right partner(s).
• Establish clear communication channels, collaborative
frameworks and performance metrics to ensure an
effective collaboration.
• Define expectations, milestones and accountability
measures to ensure the successful delivery of
laboratory automation systems.
Continuous monitoring and evaluation
• Regularly monitor the progress and performance of
laboratory automation systems.
• Establish metrics to assess the effectiveness and
efficiency of the chosen approach (‘make’ or ‘buy’).
• Continuously evaluate the strategic fit, and revisit
the ‘make or buy’ decision periodically based on
changing market dynamics, internal capabilities and
technological advancements. aligned with market
demands.
5
CONCLUSIONS.
When considering whether to ‘make’ or ‘buy’ laboratory
automation instruments, business leaders must
carefully weigh the advantages and disadvantages of
in-house development versus outsourcing. While both
options have their merits, outsourcing can provide
significant benefits in terms of time-to-market, cost
efficiency and access to expertise.
If outsourcing is your preferred approach, selecting
the right OEM partner becomes critical, as the success
of the venture relies heavily on their capabilities and
alignment with your company’s goals. Choosing
an OEM partner requires a systematic evaluation
process to ensure a successful and mutually beneficial
collaboration. This checklist has been developed to
aid commercial leaders in evaluating potential OEM
partners. Careful consideration of all aspects of this
decision can help your business to mitigate risks
and maximize the potential benefits of outsourcing
instrument development. It is crucial to approach
the OEM selection process with due diligence and
transparency.
In conclusion, the ‘make or buy’ decision requires a
thorough analysis of your company’s resources, goals
and market dynamics. Well-informed decisions help
you to navigate the complex landscape of laboratory
automation instruments, positioning your company
for success in the dynamic diagnostics industry.
Realize the potential of sustainable growth
Are you considering outsourcing the development
of your next laboratory automation system? Tecan
Synergence™ automation development services offer
cutting-edge automation solutions and expertise to
meet the evolving needs of the diagnostics industry.
By leveraging Tecan’s extensive industry know-how,
commitment to innovation, collaborative approach
and forward-thinking mindset, our Synergence services enable customers to accelerate development
today, and continuously adapt to drive more sustainable growth and business success into the future.
LEARN MORE about our Synergence OEM services:
partnering.tecan.com/synergence-oem-system-development
• Control and customization
• Flexible cost allocation
• Change management
• Resource intensivity
• Time-to-market
• Opportunity cost
• Access to expertise
• Time and cost efficiency
• Scalability and flexibility
• Dependency on supplier
• Intellectual property concerns
• Strategic alignment
MAKE: In-house development. BUY: Outsourcing to a partner.
www.tecan.com
402642 V1.1, 2023-10
Tecan Group Ltd. makes every effort to include accurate and up-to-date information within this publication; however, it is possible that omissions
or errors might have occurred. Tecan Group Ltd. cannot, therefore, make any representations or warranties, expressed or implied, as to the accuracy or
completeness of the information provided in this publication. Changes in this publication can be made at any time without notice. For technical details
and detailed procedures of the specifications provided in this document please contact your Tecan representative. This brochure may contain reference
to applications and products which are not available in all markets. Please check with your local sales representative.
All mentioned trademarks are protected by law. In general, the trademarks and designs referenced herein are trademarks, or registered trademarks,
of Tecan Group Ltd., Mannedorf, Switzerland. A complete list may be found at www.tecan.com/trademarks. Product names and company names that are
not contained in the list but are noted herein may be the trademarks of their respective owners.
© 2023, Tecan Trading AG, Switzerland, all rights reserved. For disclaimer and trademarks please visit www.tecan.com.
Australia +61 3 9647 4100 Austria +43 62 46 89 330 Belgium +32 15 42 13 19 China +86 21 220 63 206 France +33 4 72 76 04 80 Germany +49 79 51 94 170
Italy +39 02 92 44 790 Japan +81 44 556 73 11 Netherlands +31 18 34 48 17 4 Nordic +46 8 750 39 40 Singapore +65 644 41 886 Spain +34 93 595 25 31
Switzerland +41 44 922 89 22 UK +44 118 9300 300 USA +1 919 361 5200 Other countries +41 44 922 81 11
Brought to you by
Download the Whitepaper for FREE Now!
Information you provide will be shared with the sponsors for this content. Technology Networks or its sponsors may contact you to offer you content or products based on your interest in this topic. You may opt-out at any time.
Experiencing issues viewing the form? Click here to access an alternate version