We've updated our Privacy Policy to make it clearer how we use your personal data.

We use cookies to provide you with a better experience. You can read our Cookie Policy here.

Advertisement
Advancing research diagnostic criteria for Alzheimer's disease: the IWG-2 criteria
Article

Advancing research diagnostic criteria for Alzheimer's disease: the IWG-2 criteria

Advancing research diagnostic criteria for Alzheimer's disease: the IWG-2 criteria
Article

Advancing research diagnostic criteria for Alzheimer's disease: the IWG-2 criteria

Read time:
 

Want a FREE PDF version of This Article?

Complete the form below and we will email you a PDF version of "Advancing research diagnostic criteria for Alzheimer's disease: the IWG-2 criteria"

First Name*
Last Name*
Email Address*
Country*
Company Type*
Job Function*
Would you like to receive further email communication from Technology Networks?

Technology Networks Ltd. needs the contact information you provide to us to contact you about our products and services. You may unsubscribe from these communications at any time. For information on how to unsubscribe, as well as our privacy practices and commitment to protecting your privacy, check out our Privacy Policy

Bruno Dubois, Howard H Feldman, Claudia Jacova, Harald Hampel, José Luis Molinuevo, Kaj Blennow, Steven T DeKosky, Serge Gauthier, Dennis Selkoe, Randall Bateman, Stefano Cappa, Sebastian Crutch, Sebastiaan Engelborghs, Giovanni B Frisoni, Nick C Fox, Douglas Galasko, Marie-Odile Habert, Gregory A Jicha, Agneta Nordberg, Florence Pasquier, Gil Rabinovici, Philippe Robert, Christopher Rowe, Stephen Salloway, Marie Sarazin, Stéphane Epelbaum, Leonardo C de Souza, Bruno Vellas, Pieter J Visser, Lon Schneider, Yaakov Stern, Philip Scheltens, Jeffrey L Cummings.
The Lancet Neurology
June 2014

Summary:  In the past 8 years, both the International Working Group (IWG) and the US National Institute on Aging—Alzheimer's Association have contributed criteria for the diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease (AD) that better define clinical phenotypes and integrate biomarkers into the diagnostic process, covering the full staging of the disease. This Position Paper considers the strengths and limitations of the IWG research diagnostic criteria and proposes advances to improve the diagnostic framework. On the basis of these refinements, the diagnosis of AD can be simplified, requiring the presence of an appropriate clinical AD phenotype (typical or atypical) and a pathophysiological biomarker consistent with the presence of Alzheimer's pathology. We propose that downstream topographical biomarkers of the disease, such as volumetric MRI and fluorodeoxyglucose PET, might better serve in the measurement and monitoring of the course of disease. This paper also elaborates on the specific diagnostic criteria for atypical forms of AD, for mixed AD, and for the preclinical states of AD.


http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(14)70090-0


Advertisement