42 Gene Variants Associated With Dyslexia Identified
Complete the form below to unlock access to ALL audio articles.
An international team of scientists, including researchers at the University of Edinburgh and the Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics in Nijmegen (Netherlands), has for the first time pinpointed a large number of genes that are reliably associated with dyslexia. Around a third of the 42 genetic variants identified have been previously linked to general cognitive abilities and educational attainment. The researchers say their findings may aid our understanding of the biology behind why some children struggle to read or spell.
Dyslexia is known to run in families – partly because of genetic factors – but, until now, little was known about the identities of the genes involved. The new study, led by the University of Edinburgh and published in the journal Nature Genetics, represents the largest molecular genetic investigation of dyslexia to date. Previous studies linking dyslexia to individual genes have been carried out with much smaller numbers of families and the evidence was unclear, the research team says.
The team analysed DNA from more than 50,000 adults who have been diagnosed with dyslexia and more than one million adults who have not, identified via collaboration with the US company, 23andMe, Inc. “Over several decades of earlier research, more limited genetic investigations of dyslexia gave us tantalizing first clues to how DNA may be involved.” notes Simon Fisher, director of the Language and Genetics department at the Max Planck Institute. “Now, largescale genomic studies of this kind promise to transform understanding of how our genes help us learn to read and write.”
Researchers screened the entire genome, testing the association between millions of common DNA variants with dyslexia status, and found 42 genetic loci that were significantly related to the trait. Some of these are associated with other neurodevelopment conditions, such as language delay, and with thinking skills and academic achievement. Many, however, are novel and could represent genes that more specifically associate with processes essential for learning to read.
Many of the genes associated with dyslexia are also associated with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. A much smaller overlap of the genes associated with dyslexia was found for psychiatric, lifestyle and health conditions.
The genetic findings were successfully validated in an independent sample of almost 34,000 people tested for word reading skills, collected by GenLang, an international consortium led by researchers at the Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics in Nijmegen. Several of the associated genetic variants were also significant in a Chinese speaking sample, suggesting that there are cognitive processes in learning to read that are not dependent on the type of language that people use.
The researchers also used the DNA findings for investigation of four different cohorts, together with teams at the QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute in Australia, Oxford University in the UK, and the University of Colorado in the USA. They found that genetic information from the study could give an approximate index of how well children and adults can read and spell, but not with the accuracy that would be needed for diagnostic use.
Lead researcher Michelle Luciano, of the University of Edinburgh’s School of Philosophy, Psychology and Language Sciences, says the study sheds light on many unanswered questions around dyslexia.
“Our findings show that common genetic differences have very similar effects in boys and girls, and that there is a genetic link between dyslexia and ambidexterity,” says Dr Luciano. “Our results also suggest that dyslexia is very closely genetically related to performance on reading and spelling tests reinforcing the importance of standardised testing in identifying dyslexia.”
Doust C, Fontanillas P, Eising E, et al. Discovery of 42 genome-wide significant loci associated with dyslexia. Nat Genet. Published online October 20, 2022:1-9. doi:10.1038/s41588-022-01192-y
This article has been republished from the following materials. Note: material may have been edited for length and content. For further information, please contact the cited source.