Brain size matters when it comes to animal self-control
Brain size matters when it comes to animal self-control
Complete the form below and we will email you a PDF version of "Brain size matters when it comes to animal self-control"
Complete the form below to unlock access to this Audio Article: "Brain size matters when it comes to animal self-control"
Chimpanzees may throw tantrums like toddlers, but their total brain size suggests they have more self-control than, say, a gerbil or fox squirrel, according to a new study of 36 species of mammals and birds ranging from orangutans to zebra finches.
Scientists at Duke University, UC Berkeley, Stanford, Yale and more than two-dozen other research institutions collaborated on this first large-scale investigation into the evolution of self-control, defined in the study as the ability to inhibit powerful but ultimately counter-productive behavior. They found that the species with the largest brain volume -- not volume relative to body size -- showed superior cognitive powers in a series of food-foraging experiments.
Moreover, animals with the most varied diets showed the most self-restraint, according to the study published April 21 in the journal of the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
"The study levels the playing field on the question of animal intelligence," said UC Berkeley psychologist Lucia Jacobs, a co-author of this study and of its precursor, a 2012 paper in the journal, Animal Cognition.
This latest study was led by evolutionary anthropologists Evan MacLean, Brian Hare and Charles Nunn of Duke University. The findings challenge prevailing assumptions that "relative" brain size is a more accurate predictor of intelligence than "absolute" brain size. One possibility, they posited, is that "as brains get larger, the total number of neurons increases and brains tend to become more modularized, perhaps facilitating the evolution of new cognitive networks."
While participating researchers all performed the same series of experiments, they did so on their own turf and on their own animal subjects. Data was provided on bonobos, chimpanzees, gorillas, olive baboons, stump-tailed macaques, golden snub-nosed monkeys, brown, red-bellied and aye-aye lemurs, coyotes, dogs, gray wolves, Asian elephants, domestic pigeons, orange-winged amazons, Eurasian jays, western scrub jay, zebra finches and swamp sparrows.
Food inside a tube used as bait
In one experiment, creatures large and small were tested to see if they would advance toward a clear cylinder visibly containing food -- showing a lack of self-restraint -- after they had been trained to access the food through a side opening in an opaque cylinder. Large-brained primates such as gorillas quickly navigated their way to the treat or "bait." Smaller-brained animals did so with mixed results.
Still shot from video of squirrel inhibition failure. Credit: UC Berkeley
Jacobs and UC Berkeley doctoral student Mikel Delgado contributed the only rodent data in the study, putting some of the campus's fox squirrels and some Mongolian gerbils in their lab through food-foraging tasks.
Mixed results on campus squirrels' self-restraint
In the case of the fox squirrels, the red-hued, bushy-tailed critters watched as the food was placed in a side opening of an opaque cylinder. Once they demonstrated a familiarity with the location of the opening, the food was moved to a transparent cylinder and the real test began. If the squirrels lunged directly at the food inside the bottle, they had failed to inhibit their response. But if they used the side entrance, the move was deemed a success.
"About half of the squirrels and gerbils did well and inhibited the direct approach in more than seven out of 10 trials," Delgado said. "The rest didn't do so well."
In a second test, three cups (A, B and C) were placed in a row on their sides so the animals could see which one contained food. It was usually cup A. The cups were then turned upside down so the "baited" cup could no longer be seen. If the squirrels touched the cup with the food three times in a row, they graduated to the next round. This time, the food was moved from cup A to cup C at the other end of the row.
"The question was, would they approach cup A, where they had originally learned the food was placed, or could they update this learned response to get the food from a new location?" Delgado said. "The squirrels and gerbils tended to go to the original place they had been trained to get food, showing a failure to inhibit what they originally learned."
"It might be that a squirrel's success in life is affected the same way as in people," Jacobs said. "By its ability to slow down and think a bit before it snatches at a reward."
Note: Material may have been edited for length and content. For further information, please contact the cited source.
E. L. MacLean, B. Hare, C. L. Nunn, E. Addessi, F. Amici, R. C. Anderson, F. Aureli, J. M. Baker, A. E. Bania, A. M. Barnard, N. J. Boogert, E. M. Brannon, E. E. Bray, J. Bray, L. J. N. Brent, J. M. Burkart, J. Call, J. F. Cantlon, L. G. Cheke, N. S. Clayton, M. M. Delgado, L. J. DiVincenti, K. Fujita, E. Herrmann, C. Hiramatsu, L. F. Jacobs, K. E. Jordan, J. R. Laude, K. L. Leimgruber, E. J. E. Messer, A. C. de A. Moura, L. Ostoji , A. Picard, M. L. Platt, J. M. Plotnik, F. Range, S. M. Reader, R. B. Reddy, A. A. Sandel, L. R. Santos, K. Schumann, A. M. Seed, K. B. Sewall, R. C. Shaw, K. E. Slocombe, Y. Su, A. Takimoto, J. Tan, R. Tao, C. P. van Schaik, Z. Viranyi, E. Visalberghi, J. C. Wade, A. Watanabe, J. Widness, J. K. Young, T. R. Zentall, Y. Zhao. The evolution of self-control. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Published April 21 2014. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1323533111