We've updated our Privacy Policy to make it clearer how we use your personal data.

We use cookies to provide you with a better experience. You can read our Cookie Policy here.

Copy Number Variants Contribute to Risk of 'Schizophrenia-Like' Bipolar Disorder Subtype

Copy Number Variants Contribute to Risk of 'Schizophrenia-Like' Bipolar Disorder Subtype

Copy Number Variants Contribute to Risk of 'Schizophrenia-Like' Bipolar Disorder Subtype

Copy Number Variants Contribute to Risk of 'Schizophrenia-Like' Bipolar Disorder Subtype

Credit: Pixabay
Read time:

Want a FREE PDF version of This News Story?

Complete the form below and we will email you a PDF version of "Copy Number Variants Contribute to Risk of 'Schizophrenia-Like' Bipolar Disorder Subtype"

First Name*
Last Name*
Email Address*
Company Type*
Job Function*
Would you like to receive further email communication from Technology Networks?

Technology Networks Ltd. needs the contact information you provide to us to contact you about our products and services. You may unsubscribe from these communications at any time. For information on how to unsubscribe, as well as our privacy practices and commitment to protecting your privacy, check out our Privacy Policy

A form of rare genomic structural variation called copy number variants (CNVs) may be more closely associated with schizophrenia than bipolar disorder. A new study published in Biological Psychiatry failed to find that CNVs were associated broadly with risk for bipolar disorder. However, schizoaffective disorder, which is a hybrid of bipolar disorder and schizophrenia, had higher rates of CNVs compared with controls and other bipolar disorder subtypes.

"This study sheds important new light on the heterogeneity of bipolar disorder. It suggests an important new mechanism linking the biology of the most severely disabling form of bipolar disorder, schizoaffective disorder, to that of schizophrenia," said John Krystal, MD, Editor of Biological Psychiatry.

Schizophrenia and bipolar disorder share many symptoms and genetic characteristics, but the contribution of CNVs to genetic risk has only been confirmed in schizophrenia. Although some studies have previously reported increased CNVs in bipolar disorder, the new genome-wide study, which included 6,353 bipolar disorder cases and 8,656 controls, did not find strong support for any of these.

"In this paper, we can strongly conclude that these variants do not make a substantial contribution to risk of bipolar disorder broadly. However, we provide some evidence that CNVs do contribute to risk of a more 'schizophrenia-like' subtype of bipolar disorder and that this does not seem to be predominantly driven by symptoms of psychosis," said Douglas Ruderfer, PhD, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Tennessee, a senior author of the study.

No differences in CNVs were found between subtypes of bipolar I disorder with and without psychosis. The lack of connection between CNVs and psychosis led the authors to suggest that these rare genetic alterations may instead contribute to the nuances that differentiate psychotic illnesses, including bipolar disorder with psychosis, schizoaffective bipolar, and schizophrenia.

"Our findings diverge from previous studies of common genetic variation that show genetic risk of schizophrenia is associated with risk of psychosis in bipolar disorder. These observations support the notion that different classes of genetic variation contribute to different domains of psychopathology, and suggest that the combination of genetic variants in a given individual create his or her unique symptom profile," said lead author Alexander Charney, MD, PhD, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York.

The symptoms of bipolar disorder vary between people, and the subtypes of the disorder are characterized by differences in strength and timing of the symptoms. The findings that CNVs are not associated with bipolar disorder as a whole, but rather a subtype of the disorder, provide insight into how symptom variation arises within the disease and highlights that considering these different subgroups as a single diagnosis might overlook important differences that define them.

This article has been republished from materials provided by Elsevier. Note: material may have been edited for length and content. For further information, please contact the cited source.

Alexander W. Charney, Eli A. Stahl, Elaine K. Green, Chia-Yen Chen, Jennifer L. Moran, Kimberly Chambert, Richard A. Belliveau, Liz Forty, Katherine Gordon-Smith, Phil H. Lee, Evelyn J. Bromet, Peter F. Buckley, Michael A. Escamilla, Ayman H. Fanous, Laura J. Fochtmann, Douglas S. Lehrer, Dolores Malaspina, Stephen R. Marder, Christopher P. Morley, Humberto Nicolini, Diana O. Perkins, Jeffrey J. Rakofsky, Mark H. Rapaport, Helena Medeiros, Janet L. Sobell, Lena Backlund, Sarah E. Bergen, Anders Juréus, Martin Schalling, Paul Lichtenstein, James A. Knowles, Katherine E. Burdick, Ian Jones, Lisa A. Jones, Christina M. Hultman, Roy Perlis, Shaun M. Purcell, Steven A. McCarroll, Carlos N. Pato, Michele T. Pato, Ariana Di Florio, Nick Craddock, Mikael Landén, Jordan W. Smoller, Douglas M. Ruderfer, Pamela Sklar. Contribution of rare copy number variants to bipolar disorder risk is limited to schizoaffective cases. Biological Psychiatry, 2018; DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2018.12.009