We've updated our Privacy Policy to make it clearer how we use your personal data.

We use cookies to provide you with a better experience. You can read our Cookie Policy here.

Advertisement
Important Brain Receptor Doesn't Work the Way We Thought It Did
News

Important Brain Receptor Doesn't Work the Way We Thought It Did

Important Brain Receptor Doesn't Work the Way We Thought It Did
News

Important Brain Receptor Doesn't Work the Way We Thought It Did

Credit: Gerd Altmann/ Pixabay
Read time:
 

Want a FREE PDF version of This News Story?

Complete the form below and we will email you a PDF version of "Important Brain Receptor Doesn't Work the Way We Thought It Did"

First Name*
Last Name*
Email Address*
Country*
Company Type*
Job Function*
Would you like to receive further email communication from Technology Networks?

Technology Networks Ltd. needs the contact information you provide to us to contact you about our products and services. You may unsubscribe from these communications at any time. For information on how to unsubscribe, as well as our privacy practices and commitment to protecting your privacy, check out our Privacy Policy

One of the most important molecules in the brain doesn’t work quite the way scientists thought it did, according to new work by researchers at Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons and Carnegie Mellon University.


The results, published April 20 in Naturemay aid the development of a new generation of more effective neurological and psychiatric therapies with fewer side effects.


The new research takes a close look at glutamate, the most prevalent neurotransmitter in the brain. Glutamate binds to receptors on brain cells, which opens a channel into the cell, allowing ions to pass through to propagate an electrical signal.


“The way the brain works is through communication between neurons, and these are the main receptors which allow this communication,” says Alexander Sobolevsky, PhD, associate professor of biochemistry and molecular biophysics at Columbia and senior author on the paper.


Each receptor can bind up to four molecules of glutamate and produce four different levels of conductivity. Previous studies had linked binding to conductivity in a simple stepwise fashion, in which binding each additional glutamate molecule increased the conductivity another step.


While that explanation made sense, nobody had looked closely enough to confirm it. In the new work, the investigators combined a technique called cryo-electron microscopy with sophisticated data analysis to reveal the first detailed pictures of glutamate binding to its receptors.


“We actually carried out experiments in the conditions where we see all these intermediates, one glutamate and then two glutamates, three glutamates, and then it binds all four,” says Sobolevsky.


These images reveal that glutamate binds to the subunits of its receptor only in specific patterns. That overturns the prevailing view that each subunit binds glutamate independently and points toward new levels of complexity in neuronal signaling and drug responses.


Instead of straightforward stepwise transitions, Sobolevsky and his colleagues found that a glutamate molecule must bind to one of two specific receptor subunits before any glutamates can bind to the other two subunits. In addition, the conductivity levels of the receptor didn’t correlate directly to the number of glutamates bound to it; a receptor could have two or more glutamates attached but still only reach the first level of conductivity.


The results open an entirely new line of investigation, and the team is now probing how different accessory molecules on neurons affect the interaction. Learning more about the glutamate receptors’ specific activation states may aid the development of better drugs for conditions that involve glutamate receptors, such as depression, dementia, Parkinson’s disease, epilepsy, and stroke.


Reference: Yelshanskaya MV, Patel DS, Kottke CM, Kurnikova MG, Sobolevsky AI. Opening of glutamate receptor channel to subconductance levels. Nature. 2022:1-7. doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-04637-w


This article has been republished from the following materials. Note: material may have been edited for length and content. For further information, please contact the cited source.

 
Advertisement