We've updated our Privacy Policy to make it clearer how we use your personal data.

We use cookies to provide you with a better experience. You can read our Cookie Policy here.

Advertisement
Theory for Why Sleep Enhances Learning Confirmed by New Study
News

Theory for Why Sleep Enhances Learning Confirmed by New Study

Theory for Why Sleep Enhances Learning Confirmed by New Study
News

Theory for Why Sleep Enhances Learning Confirmed by New Study

Credit: Andrea Piacquadio/ Pexels
Read time:
 

Want a FREE PDF version of This News Story?

Complete the form below and we will email you a PDF version of "Theory for Why Sleep Enhances Learning Confirmed by New Study"

First Name*
Last Name*
Email Address*
Country*
Company Type*
Job Function*
Would you like to receive further email communication from Technology Networks?

Technology Networks Ltd. needs the contact information you provide to us to contact you about our products and services. You may unsubscribe from these communications at any time. For information on how to unsubscribe, as well as our privacy practices and commitment to protecting your privacy, check out our Privacy Policy

The consolidation of learning that occurs during sleep is a result of the learning process and not merely because certain brain regions get used a lot during learning, a RIKEN researcher and her collaborator have shown. This finding resolves a long-standing debate among sleep researchers.


In Japan, many school students stay up very late to cram for exams, but that is a self-defeating strategy according to Masako Tamaki of the RIKEN Center for Brain Science. “When you want to learn something, you should go to bed at a regular time,” she recommends. “Students study very late, but a lot of that knowledge will be lost if they don’t get enough sleep.”


That’s because new knowledge and skills that we acquire while awake are consolidated through neural processing that occurs when we sleep.


But there has been much debate about how this consolidation occurs. Is it simply because neurons that get used a lot when learning are downregulated for renormalization during sleep? Or is there something inherent in the learning process that causes this consolidation to occur?


Now, strong evidence for the learning-dependent model for consolidation during sleep has been found by Yuka Sasaki at Brown University in the United States and Tamaki, who first became interested in sleep research after a sleep-paralysis episode during which she thought she was being strangled by a stranger.


Two groups of young volunteers each underwent two sessions of training with a visual exercise. For the first group, the two training sessions were identical and they got better at the exercise. In contrast, the second training session for the second group was designed to nullify the learning achieved in the first session, and consequently they showed very little overall improvement.


The two groups then slept, and their performances on the visual exercise were measured on waking. The results provided strong support for the learning-dependent model. First, the behavioral results indicated that the first group showed substantial improvements after sleeping, whereas the second group showed almost none despite having been trained for the same amount of time. Second, the brain-signal monitoring during sleeping revealed that two kinds of activities consistent with that model were involved in processing, namely theta activity during rapid eye movement (REM) sleep and sigma activity during non-REM sleep. However, the study found no involvement of slow-wave activity during non-REM sleep, which has been shown to be associated with use-dependent processes.


These results confirmed the pair’s suspicions: learning, and not just brain usage, is critical for consolidation during sleep. “Previous studies we had done were more consistent with the learning-dependent model,” notes Tamaki.


Reference: Tamaki M, Sasaki Y. Sleep-Dependent facilitation of visual perceptual learning is consistent with a learning-dependent model. J Neurosci. 2022;42(9):1777-1790. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0982-21.2021


This article has been republished from the following materials. Note: material may have been edited for length and content. For further information, please contact the cited source.

Advertisement