Microplastic pollution has become a global challenge, with a growing number being detected worldwide, even in remote regions, such as the Arctic Ocean.
Studies exploring the impact these contaminants have on human and environmental health aim to quantify the presence of microplastics and identify their sources, providing crucial data for future regulatory and monitoring efforts.
In this Q&A, experts from the Norwegian Institute for Water Research (NIVA) discuss their collaborative efforts with Russian researchers to study microplastics in the Arctic Ocean using FTIR spectroscopy.
Download this interview to explore:
- The global impact of microplastics pollution on human and environmental health.
- The use of FTIR spectroscopy to study the impact on microplastics in the sensitive Arctic ecosystem.
- How current studies could shape future regulations and monitoring of microplastics pollution.
CASE
STUDY
Customer Spotlight: Norwegian Institute
for Water Research (NIVA)
CUSTOMER
STORY
Customer Spotlight: Norwegian Institute
for Water Research (NIVA)
The challenges of microplastics pollution in the
environment continues to generate global interest.
Many studies are underway to better understand
the impact that plastics can have on human and
environmental health as well as the scope of the
problem. Micro- and nanoplastics have been found
across the globe even in the most remote regions of
the world.
In the following Q&A, representatives from the
Norwegian Institute for Water Research (NIVA)
discuss their work in this area. The team is
collaborating with colleagues from Russia to
investigate the presence of microplastics in the
Arctic Ocean. This pristine environment is particularly
sensitive to environmental pollution and pressures
because it has very short food chains where
impacts to any one species will quickly spread. In
a region highly reliant on the health of its fisheries,
there is significant concern on maintaining a
healthy environment. The investigations underway
are focused on understanding the amount of
microplastics which might be present and the
sources of the pollution. This information can be
used in the future to make informed decisions for
regulating and monitoring microplastics.
NIVA Representatives:
Professor Bert van Bavel, Chief Scientist
An analytical chemist and expert on QA/QC with over
30 years of experience in the analyses of priority and
emerging pollutants, Dr. van Bavel has been leading
the United Nations Environment Program’s capacity
building program for the Stockholm Convention.
He is part of the EU project, EUROqCHARM, which
is focused on developing technology to measure
microplastics in the aquatic environment and
harmonizing microplastics measurement methods.
Dr. Evgeny Yakushev, Senior Research Scientist
A chemical oceanographer, Dr. Yakushev has
extensively studied nutrient cycling in seawater
and is involved with mathematical modeling of
ecological systems. He is focused regionally
on the Artic and scientific collaborations with
Russia, including several projects between the
Norwegian Ministry of Environment and the
Russian Ministry of Environment.
Dr. Svetlana Pakhomova, Engineer
Dr. Pakhomova has been with NIVA for the last
5 years and her work is focused around the
evaluation of technologies for the measurement
and identification of microplastics.
Customer Spotlight: Norwegian Institute for Water Research (NIVA)
www.perkinelmer.com 2
Please tell us about your work studying
microplastics in the Barents and Arctic
Seas and why it was conducted?
Van Bavel: If you look at the area of microplastics
research, there is very little information about this
particular region. These joint expeditions between
NIVA and our Russian counterparts provided us with a
good opportunity to obtain more knowledge. There is a lot
of discussion about microplastics possibly entering this
pristine area, so we wanted to acquire more information.
Yakushev: There were several research questions
which we wanted to answer. Before we conducted
our studies, it wasn’t clear whether this area was
polluted with microplastics or not, so we wanted
to confirm the presents of microplastics. Once we
found microplastics, we wanted to understand how
microplastics came to be found in this region – is it
currents from the Atlantic which brings polluted water
or is it rivers in the region which flow into the Barents
Sea? Around the world rivers are a main source of
microplastic introduction into ocean so we wanted to
examine that dynamic in this region as well.
We found that the concentration of microplastics in
river waters was less than that at sea because these
rivers flow through unpopulated areas. So, we really
wanted to find the sources of microplastics so that
we could have data that we can then examine and
extrapolate with mathematical models. If we can
identify sources of microplastics, we can inform
decision makers who can then take action to prevent
this pollution.
Russia conducts several scientific expeditions to the
Arctic every year and NIVA’s participation allowed
for the application of more modern methods and
technologies for the detection of microplastics that are
not available in Russia. The data that we were able to
generate can be used to help both Russia and Western
nations in combating plastics pollution.
Van Bavel: With our expertise in the instrumentation
including the PerkinElmer Spectrum Two™ which was
on board, we have the technology to measure the
pollution. Our Russian colleagues have the access
to areas of interest with their expeditions. Coming
together we can lend our expertise and help harmonize
methods for measuring microplastics.
There are also some big questions related to microplastics.
Is there an accumulation zone in the Barents Sea? If so,
where do these plastics come from? Those were the
main questions we tried to focus on for this project. Figure 3: Map showing high plastic concentration in the Barents Sea, the Kara Gate
area in particular.
Q
A
Figure 2: 2021 Sample Collection Locations.
Figure 1: 2020 Sample Collection Locations.
Customer Spotlight: Norwegian Institute for Water Research (NIVA)
www.perkinelmer.com 3
What type of work were the students
involved with?
Pakhomova: The students and young scientists on-board
were very interested in microplastics studies and asked
how to do the sampling and analysis. The Spectrum Two
is a very good device and easy to use. It works very well
for microplastics. I taught several students how to use it
and they helped us process our large number of samples
– almost 130 samples with each sample having from 5 to
1000 microplastic particles.
The PerkinElmer solution is the gold standard at NIVA.
We tested other devices and always compare them to
the Spectrum Two.
Van Bavel: We can analyze the microplastics down to
500 microns, or half a millimeter, with the Spectrum
Two. The other samples go to the lab, and we analyze
them with the Spotlight™ 400, FTIR Microscopy System.
If you take the strict definition from 2 millimeters to
0.5, larger microplastics can be analyze on-board the
ship which is a big achievement because that is a large
portion of the microplastics. The real small particles we
need to do in the lab because we need liquid nitrogen
to cool down the Spotlight and that’s not available on
research ships.
Q
A
Could you explain what the environment is
like in this region and what impact pollution
could have on the ecosystems there?
Van Bavel: While the area is very pristine it is also very
biologically active. The food webs are very abundant
from plankton to whales. If you disturb this area which
is already under pressure from climate change, what
will be the impact – that is what we are trying to
investigate and understand.
Yakushev: Its ecosystem isn’t as diverse as some other
areas, but it is being impacted by pollution. The Arctic
is an important are for fisheries. We found microplastic
fibers inside fish, so it is there an effect on organisms.
How dangerous is it? We still don’t know; we need to
study more.
Van Bavel: From the NIVA perspective, we do a lot of
work in the Arctic area, and this is another pressure
on a pristine area and its short food chains. These
food chains are important for a lot of species which
are unique to the arctic area. We see that there are
a lot of plastics accumulating in ice and if the ice
melts, that would be another source for the release of
microplastics into this environment. So, we are looking
at this multi-pressure environment to try and protect
the Arctic as much as possible.
When you speak about the collaboration
between NIVA and Russia, can you tell us
what institutes were involved?
Yakushev: There were several institutes that were
involved in the expeditions that we have referenced.
These include the Institute of Oceanology which is
situated in Moscow, and the Pacific Oceanographic
Institute from Vladivostok. They were studying
the methane cycle, CO2
levels and climate related
phenomena but were kind enough to give us ship time
and invite us on the expedition to study plastics.
In addition, there are expeditions organized which are
“floating universities” where students from several
universities go on a cruise to conduct scientific
experiments. We were happy to show them how to
collect samples for microplastics analysis which were
then analyzed with the Spectrum Two. These universities
included Moscow State University, St. Petersburg State
University, St. Petersburg Hydrometeorological University
and Northeaster University.
Q
Q
A
A
Figure 4: Samples are collected, numbered, measured and photographed.
Customer Spotlight: Norwegian Institute for Water Research (NIVA)
For a complete listing of our global offices, visit www.perkinelmer.com/ContactUs
Copyright ©2024, PerkinElmer U.S. LLC. All rights reserved. PerkinElmer® is a registered trademark of PerkinElmer U.S. LLC. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners.
126850 (761715)
PerkinElmer U.S. LLC
710 Bridgeport Ave.
Shelton, CT 06484-4794 USA
(+1) 855-726-9377
www.perkinelmer.com
What has been the results of your research
thus far?
Yakushev: We have been able to determine that there
are indeed microplastics present in the Arctic Ocean.
The most polluted location that we have samples
thus far is the Barents Sea, especially the Kara Gate
area. The plastic concentration generally decreases
from West to East and from the Central Arctic to the
unpopulated Siberian coast.
Van Bavel: One of the big learnings is that we need more
information. This is one of the first analyses of this area.
Weather conditions, season, and currents can all influence
the data so we would like to have more information.
We have purchased two Spectrum Two instruments to
be placed on cruise ships which will be visiting these
areas. Our objective would be to use these cruise ships
as a platform to expand our sampling. I’ll be installing
one of the instruments on a cruise ship next week.
This additional information will be fed into the models
that we are developing to provide us with a better view
of the microplastic distribution and influxes in the region.
What will be your next steps in this work?
Van Bavel: We must figure out what the biggest
sources of microplastics are and if our data is reliable
in terms of season, place, time, and weather conditions.
We will continue working on site with the students to
test a large number of samples and we will make a
Spectrum Two available for the students from Russia
to work with.
Pakhomova: Another existing problem in microplastics
research is that different research groups utilize different
methods which makes it difficult to compare results. We
have been trying to harmonize methods and analysis
techniques to allow for a comparison of results from
different regions, seasons and weather conditions.
Van Bavel: We are leading a harmonization effort
for which we have 15 or 18 European partners. Our
collaboration with our Russian partners gives us the
opportunity to introduce the same methods to them so
that we will be able to reliably compare results and feed
the data that they generate into the same models.
Q Q
A A
Figure 5: The NIVA team pictured with the Spectrum Two FTIR.