Inhibitory motor control problems may be unique identifier in adults with ADHD
News Nov 16, 2016 | Victora M. Indivero, Pennsylvania State University
Young adults diagnosed with ADHD may display subtle physiological signs that could lead to a more precise diagnosis, according to Pennsylvania State University (Penn State) researchers.
In a recent study, young adults with ADHD, when performing a continuous motor task, had more difficulty inhibiting a motor response compared to young adults who did not have ADHD. The participants with ADHD also produced more force during the task compared to participants without ADHD.
See Also: Inside the adult ADHD brain
Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a common childhood disorder that can continue to affect up to 65 percent of these children as they become adults, according to the researchers.
"A large group of individuals have the label 'ADHD,' but present with different symptoms," said Kristina A. Neely, assistant professor, kinesiology. "One of the goals of our ADHD research is to discover unique physiological signals that may characterize different subgroups of the disorder."
Previous studies have shown that some individuals with ADHD may have poor control of their motor systems, but until recently, the way that it was measured was not very sensitive.
"In previous tasks, motor and cognitive function was evaluated with a key-press response: You hit the button or you didn't," said Neely. "We measure precisely how much force an individual is producing during a continuous motor task. This type of task provides us with more information than the dichotomous 'yes/no' response."
In a recent study using a continuous motor task, participants produced force with their index finger and thumb in response to cues on a visual display. Participants were instructed to produce force when the visual cue was any color except blue. In the "blue" trials, participants were told to withhold force production.
Neely and colleagues found that participants with ADHD symptoms produced more force on trials when they were told to withhold a response, compared to those without ADHD. Further, the amount of force that was produced during these trials was correlated with specific ADHD-related symptoms. The researchers presented their findings at the annual Society for Neuroscience meeting November 12-16 in San Diego, California.
"The use of a precise and continuous motor task provides a more nuanced understanding of inhibitory control, compared to a button-press task," said Neely. "We found that young adults with ADHD produced more force on the 'blue' trials compared to young adults without ADHD. And the amount of force produced was related to self-report of ADHD-related symptoms of inattention, hyperactivity and impulsivity. Moving forward, we will manipulate the parameters of our force-production task to determine which aspects of motor control are related to specific symptoms."
Understanding the impact of particular types of ADHD and their effect on motor function could lead to more targeted diagnoses—which could aid in determining optimal treatment options for patients based on their specific symptom profile.
Note: Material may have been edited for length and content. For further information, please contact the cited source.
Researchers Find a Way to Separate Side Effects of Opioid Drugs Reducing RiskNews
Scientists have discovered a way to separate these two effects -- pain relief and breathing, opening a window of opportunity to make effective pain medications without the risk of respiratory failure.READ MORE
Biological Mechanism of a Leading Cause of Childhood Blindness RevealedNews
Scientists have revealed the pathology of cells and structures stricken by optic nerve hypoplasia, a leading cause of childhood blindness in developed nations.READ MORE
Machine Learning: Helping Determine How a Drug Affects the BrainNews
Machine learning could improve our ability to determine whether a new drug works in the brain, potentially enabling researchers to detect drug effects that would be missed entirely by conventional statistical tests, finds a new UCL study published today in Brain.READ MORE