We've updated our Privacy Policy to make it clearer how we use your personal data. We use cookies to provide you with a better experience. You can read our Cookie Policy here.

Advertisement

Mouse Study Explores Link Between Trisomy 21 and Learning Disabilities in Down Syndrome

Mouse Study Explores Link Between Trisomy 21 and Learning Disabilities in Down Syndrome content piece image
A Down syndrome karyotype with trisomy 21 highlighted in red.
Listen with
Speechify
0:00
Register for free to listen to this article
Thank you. Listen to this article using the player above.

Want to listen to this article for FREE?

Complete the form below to unlock access to ALL audio articles.

Read time: 1 minute

Most people have 46 chromosomes in each cell, divided into 23 pairs: people with Down syndrome (DS) have an extra copy of chromosome 21, which carries over 200 genes.

In this study, published in Cell Reports, researchers at UCL, supported by Cardiff University and the Francis Crick Institute, used mouse models to try and find out how having these extra genes causes learning disability.

Chromosome 21 and its genes are also found in mice, although the genes have dispersed onto three smaller regions on three different mouse chromosomes. These are mouse chromosomes 16, 10 and 17 containing 148 genes, 62 genes and 19 genes respectively.

The researchers looked at the effect of the genes in each of these three different mouse regions (chromosomes) on learning and memory. To do this three different mouse strains (groups of mice), were genetically modified to carry an extra copy of one of the gene groups on mouse chromosomes 16, 10 or 17.

During navigation tests, where mice needed to negotiate a simple ‘left-right’ T-maze, each group was measured for both memory and decision-making ability.

During these tests, the electrical activity of brain regions important for memory and decision-making was also monitored, using an electroencephalogram (EEG).

The researchers found that one of the mouse strains (‘Dp10Yey’ mice) had worse memory, and had irregular brain circuity (signals) in a part of the brain called hippocampus – which is known to be very important for memory.

They also found another strain (‘Dp1Tyb’ mice) had worse decision-making ability and had poor brain signalling between the hippocampus and the pre-frontal cortex – needed for planning and decision-making. And the third strain (‘Dp17Yey’ mice) had no unusual electrical activity in the brain.

Co-author, Professor Matthew Walker (UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology), said: “These findings are a complete surprise – we did not expect the three different gene groups would act completely differently.

“Scientists have traditionally worked on the hypothesis that a single gene, or single genes, was the likely cause of intellectual disabilities associated with Down syndrome.

“We have shown – for the first time – that different and multiple genes are contributing to the various cognitive problems associated with Down syndrome.”

Researchers will now look to discover specifically which gene or genes, within the smaller gene groups, are responsible for impaired memory and decision-making.

Corresponding author Professor Elizabeth Fisher (UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology) said: “Our study provides critical insights into the mechanisms underlying neuro-disability in Down syndrome and indicates that intellectual disability in Down syndrome may result from different underlying genetic, functional and regional brain abnormalities.

“This implies that therapies for people with Down syndrome should perhaps target multiple processes, and we have made the initial steps in identifying what some of these processes are.”

Researchers were supported by grant funding from Wellcome.  

Reference: Chang, P., Bush, D., Schorge, S., Good, M., Canonica, T., Shing, N., Noy, S., Wiseman, F. K., Burgess, N., Tybulewicz, V. L. J., Walker, M. C., & Fisher, E. M. C. (2020). Altered Hippocampal-Prefrontal Neural Dynamics in Mouse Models of Down Syndrome. Cell Reports, 30(4), 1152-1163.e4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2019.12.065

This article has been republished from the following materials. Note: material may have been edited for length and content. For further information, please contact the cited source.