What Makes a Good Scientist?
Article Jun 15, 2016
The ability to replicate published findings is vital for supporting scientific claims. However, a recent survey published in PLOS Biology1 has found that the largest effect on the perception of a researcher’s ability and character comes from how they respond to the process of replication.
A survey of 4,786 members of the public, 428 undergraduates, and 313 scientific professionals was conducted to explore the perception of scientists based on statements about their research, its reproducibility and how they respond following success or failure to replicate.
Respondents evaluated the scientist who produces boring but certain results more favourably to the scientist who produces exciting but uncertain results. A researcher’s reputation was more closely tied to their process, whether they were responding to others replications or pursuing their own, opposing the notion that failure to replicate is a threat to reputation.
The group, from The Department of Psychology, University of Virginia, and Center of Open Science, conducted this study to reveal peoples’ idealized views of scientific practices in order to motivate more open science communication and to promote greater success in scientific research.
‘Because true innovations are rare, valuing replication is important to foster efficient filtering of interesting findings and accelerate knowledge building’. This paper presents timely research on views towards scientific research and character, and provide an opportunity to challenge our own beliefs and biases about the research and reporting process.
About the paper, Chares Ebersole commented ‘I think researchers are, overall, pretty level-headed about these issues. These data support that idea. We understand that research is very difficult and judge others accordingly’.
1. Ebersole, C. R., Axt, J. R., & Nosek, B. A. (2016). Scientists’ Reputations Are Based on Getting It Right, Not Being Right. PLoS Biol, 14(5), e1002460.
The Quest for Exascale: Have the Goal Posts Changed in HPC?Article
The High-Performance Computing community has in recent years been dominated by the quest for Exascale systems, capable of a billion billion calculations per second. However, the interest in artificial intelligence and machine learning capabilities has pushed exascale off the front of stage. In this article, David Yip, HPC and Storage Business Development Manager at OCF, asks whether the quest for exascale is truly over.READ MORE
Why do Humans Have Such Large Brains? Our Study Suggests Ecology Was the Driving ForceArticle
Most animals have brains in proportion to their body size – species with larger bodies often have larger brains. But the human brain is almost six times bigger than expected for our bodies.READ MORE
King of Pop Inspired Moves Means More Visits to the DocArticle
Neurosurgeons raise awareness of the stresses of extreme dance moves on the spineREAD MORE
Comments | 0 ADD COMMENT
Like what you just read? You can find similar content on the communities below.Analysis & Separations Applied Sciences Biopharma Cancer Research Cell Science Diagnostics Drug Discovery Genomics Research Informatics Proteomics & Metabolomics Neuroscience Immunology & Microbiology
To personalize the content you see on Technology Networks homepage, Log In or Subscribe for FreeLOGIN SUBSCRIBE FOR FREE
2nd Annual Artificial Intelligence in Drug Development Congress
Sep 20 - Sep 21, 2018