We've updated our Privacy Policy to make it clearer how we use your personal data. We use cookies to provide you with a better experience. You can read our Cookie Policy here.

Advertisement

Exposomics Reveals the Environment’s Impact on Our Health

Transparent anatomical view of a human body highlighting internal organs, illustrating exposomics research.
Credit: iStock
Listen with
Speechify
0:00
Register for free to listen to this article
Thank you. Listen to this article using the player above.

Want to listen to this article for FREE?

Complete the form below to unlock access to ALL audio articles.

Read time: 2 minutes

As concerns about the impact of contaminants on human health continue to grow, a relatively new scientific field is gaining traction: exposomics. The exposome encompasses the totality of environmental exposures across a person’s lifetime. While genomics explores fixed genetic information and inherited predispositions, exposomics investigates the influence of external factors on biological processes and disease development.


Technology Networks recently spoke with Susan Bird, senior manager at Thermo Fisher Scientific, to learn more about the analytical challenges of identifying low-level exposures, the importance of quantifying unknown compounds without established libraries and how cutting-edge mass spectrometry (MS) platforms are advancing exposomics research. 

Kate Robinson (KR):

What is the exposome? How could exposomics inform public health initiatives? 


Susan Bird, PhD (SB):

Our exposome is the sum of all environmental exposures we encounter over our lifetime. These are all individual encounters influenced by air and water quality, our diet and the pharmaceuticals or personal care products we use. Unlike the genome, which is fixed, predictive and well-mapped, the exposome is much more dynamic andcontinues to belargely unknown.


The field of exposomics is promising because it offers insight into how external factors contribute to individual and population health outcomes by revealing exposure patterns. It could also inform local public health initiatives and address regional disparities. 



KR:

What challenges are associated with exposomics research? 


SB:

One major challenge in exposomics research is that many of these individual exposures can occur at extremely low levels and significantly impact health in some populations but not as much in others. For example, differences in diet could impact how people living in the same neighborhood are affected by the air quality.


Researchers must also account for a wide dynamic range from low- to high-level exposures and track large families of compounds, like PFAS, which are evolving as chemicals are slightly altered to avoid regulations.


As the number of compounds we’re studying continues to increase and we have to consider individual sensitivity, assessing the full health impact becomes increasingly complex. The broader research community will have to come together to fully understand what’s happening.



KR:

With millions of potential exposures, which contaminants are being prioritized in research? 


SB:

Exposomics is still a relatively new field, with the study only beginning to gain mainstream prominence in the last two decades. Our research community is still building our understanding of all the potential exposures and how they may impact human health to see where research efforts should go. For example, we’re seeing increasingly high cancer rates in younger populations across the United States. Why is that? Many hypothesize that it’s due to exposures from the environment, processed food, and mainly, our interaction with chemical compounds like PFAS, which are everywhere today, from food and the environment to other consumer products and packaging.


Women’s health is an area I’m particularly interested in because we are seeing increases in breast cancer, and we need to figure out how the environment plays a role. Unlike the genome, where we can be more predictive, there’s a lot more differentiation in exposomics that needs understanding, and we’re at the precipice of that with this field gaining more steam from technology advances and overall awareness.  




KR:

How have advancements in MS enabled researchers to detect and quantify emerging contaminants more accurately?   


SB:

Recent advancements in MS are significantly improving researchers’ ability to detect and quantify known and emerging contaminants with high accuracy and sensitivity.


High-resolution accurate mass spectrometers  allow scientists to identify compounds present in complex samples (known or unknown), which is essential in exposomics research as our understanding of how different compounds affect human health continues to evolve. These instruments are capable of performing both quantitation and discovery simultaneously, which is all the more important when supporting targeted analysis or achieving other breakthrough discoveries. Our Orbitrap Astral mass spectrometer, for example, has dual detectors that allow researchers to combine sensitivity and speed to uncover the potential biological impact of these many different exposures.  



KR:

How can researchers confidently identify unknown compounds if reference standards or established libraries do not exist? 


SB:

Identifying unknown compounds is another key challenge in exposomics. This is where MS shines, because researchers have to do it analytically in the absence of libraries. We have to use the whole analytical toolbox to conduct this research, and MS, in particular, provides the most robust and sensitive analysis when studying different molecules, for example.


One important approach made possible by MS involves using alternative fragmentation techniques to break apart molecules in many different ways, giving scientists a richer dataset to interpret.