We've updated our Privacy Policy to make it clearer how we use your personal data. We use cookies to provide you with a better experience. You can read our Cookie Policy here.

Advertisement

POLE/POLD1 Mutations in Cancer Improve Immunotherapy Response

POLE/POLD1 Mutations in Cancer Improve Immunotherapy Response  content piece image
Listen with
Speechify
0:00
Register for free to listen to this article
Thank you. Listen to this article using the player above.

Want to listen to this article for FREE?

Complete the form below to unlock access to ALL audio articles.

Read time: 1 minute

New research from Cleveland Clinic is demonstrating that pathogenic polymerase epsilon and delta (POLE/POLD1) genetic mutations lead to improved response to immune checkpoint blockade, a powerful class of immunotherapy drugs.


The findings, published in Nature Genetics, contribute to a growing list of discoveries that prove certain classes of drugs are more effective in cases where the genetic makeup of the tumor – and not the type or origin of the tumor – should determine the decision-making process for treatment.


“To date, this is the most comprehensive analysis of the mutations in POLE/POLD1 genes in patients with cancer,” said Timothy Chan, M.D., Ph.D., chair of the Center for Immunotherapy and Precision Immuno-Oncology at Cleveland Clinic. “Our research here shows that patients with POLE/POLD1 mutations should get immune checkpoint blockade therapy as a preferred treatment, and that POLE/POLD1 mutations are a potential indication for immunotherapy regardless of the cancer type or where the cancer started in the body.”


POLE/POLD1 are DNA repair genes that are genetically altered in nearly 4% of tumors across all cancer types. Not all the POLE/POLD1 mutations are pathogenic (predisposed to a certain disease) or functional that could lead to sensitivity to immunotherapy.


Tumors containing pathogenic POLE/POLD1 mutations have high levels of immune cell infiltrations, and until this point, it was challenging to distinguish these pathogenic mutations from non-functional ones. It had remained unclear how these mutations would affect patients’ response to anti-tumor immunity therapy.


In preclinical models, the growth of tumors introduced with well-established POLE/POLD1 pathogenic mutations was dramatically inhibited by immune checkpoint blockade therapies. In contrast, treatment had little effect on growth of the parental POLE/POLD1 non-mutated tumors.


To determine whether similar phenomena could be observed in patients, the team generated statistical learning models based on mutational signatures of the POLE/POLD1 mutant tumors. These signatures could identify the telltale DNA fingerprints of functional POLE/POLD1 mutations. Modeling demonstrated high accuracy for distinguishing the tumors with pathogenic POLE/POLD1 mutations from tumors with the functional mutation. The researchers further found that their model outperformed other traditional approaches for identifying the patients with pathogenic POLE/POLD1 mutations that are more likely to benefit from immunotherapy. It was able to identify mutations that sensitize tumors to immunotherapy that would otherwise have been missed.


Further analysis indicated that the underlying mechanism is associated with the increased quantity and quality of the immunogenic mutations, as well as the improved immune microenvironment in the tumors harboring pathogenic POLE/POLD1 mutations.

 

“The short-term impact of this study on cancer immunotherapy is that we demonstrated that tumors with functional POLE/POLD1 mutations are sensitive to immunotherapy,” said Xiaoxiao Ma, Ph.D., a postdoctoral researcher at Cleveland Clinic and lead author of the study. “The long-term impact is that we demonstrated it’s possible to utilize genomic features, such as mutational signatures, to identify a major indication for immune checkpoint therapy.”


Reference: Ma X, Riaz N, Samstein RM, et al. Functional landscapes of POLE and POLD1 mutations in checkpoint blockade-dependent antitumor immunity. Nat Genet. 2022:1-17. doi: 10.1038/s41588-022-01108-w

 

This article has been republished from the following materials. Note: material may have been edited for length and content. For further information, please contact the cited source.