Automated Solid-Phase Extraction of Oraganochlorine Pesticides from Drinking Water
Poster Jul 30, 2014
Frans Schoustsen and Pranathi R Perati
Organochlorine pesticides (OCP) are a class of chemicals that were used to control insect pests since the 1940s. The use of OCPs was banned in the later part of last century due to their longevity, a trait that made them effective for long term pest control, but also increased concerns of potential health outcomes such as cancer in humans and ecosystem disruption.
Pesticides are regulated in the U.S. by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) under the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA). Some states also regulate pesticides under FIFRA, in a more restrictive manner than the EPA. The Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants, a UN treaty, has established global bans on several organochlorine pesticides including DDT, hexachlorobenzene, pentachlorobenzene, chlordane, dieldrin, endrin, heptachlor, mirex, toxaphene, hexachlorocyclohexane (alpha-HCH, beta-HCH, and gamma-HCH (lindane)), and chlordecone.
OCPs can be highly toxic, are hydrophobic, lipophilic, and extremely stable. Once in the air, water, and soil, they are subject to global deposition processes and bioaccumulation in the food chain. Diet is the main source of human exposure, primarily through food consumption where OCPs have bioaccumulated.
In this study twenty chlorinated pesticides were extracted from drinking water using a Thermo Scientific™ Dionex™ AutoTrace™ 280 Solid-Phase Extraction instrument and the Thermo Scientific™ Dionex™ SolEx™ C 18 cartridges. The recoveries were compared to the traditional liquid-liquid extraction method (LLE). Analysis for both sample preparation methods was performed by gas chromatography with Electron Capture Detection (GC-ECD)
Fundamentals and Comparisons for Organic Sample Extract EvaporationPoster
Sample preparation is a key step in the analysis process
Parameters for evaporation and their impact on analysis have been discussed
Improvements in matching the sample to the evaporation device characteristics can help reduce variability and improve recovery
Examples for choosing a system based on sample volume, types of analytes, sample load, and initial investment considerations
Using Elemental Analysis For Discrimination Of Pinot Noir Wines From Six Different Districts In An AvaPoster
The determination of geographical origin of wine is gaining increased interest by researchers and federal agencies around the world, partially due to increased fraud with regards to place of origin labelling. For wine, multi-elemental profiling of macro, micro, and trace elements has been proposed for determination of authenticity. Commercial wines from different wineries in 5 different neighborhoods within one AVA show characteristic elemental fingerprints. Macro, micro and trace elements as well as elemental ratios contribute to the observed separation, indicating the involvement of multiple factors and underlying mechanisms, including location and soil composition, elemental uptake by vine and rootstock, viticulture and nutrient management, water sources, and small differences in the different wineries.READ MORE
Fast arsenic speciation analysis of wines and rice with LC-ICP-QQQPoster
This method was designed in response to recent and proposed food standards, both international and national, that limit inorganic arsenic rather than total, organic, or individual arsenic species such as arsenite (AsIII) and arsenate (AsV). Analysis time is 10x faster than the current FDA regulatory method, increasing sample throughput, avoided spectral interferences and dramatically increased sensitivity. Validation data from two laboratories demonstrate the method’s accuracy and reproducibility of both wine and rice matrices in a single analytical batch.READ MORE