Comparison of Dissociated Phoria Measuring Methods. Repeatability and Reliability
Poster Apr 24, 2013
Ane Murueta-Goyena Larrañaga
Many methods of heterophoria measurement are clinically available. Several studies have been carried out to compare their results. Due to the difference of the methods in the ability to control accommodation, the induced proximal convergence, the technique used for dissociation, and the method of data analysis1, the results can vary on the same patient.
The aim of this study is to determine the reliability and compare reproducibility of different dissociated phoria measure tests: Modified Thorington, Von Graefe, and “fast” and “slow” Cover Test. For that purpose, I designed a specific protocol, in order to control and equate test conditions.
Bioluminescent Kinase Profiling Systems For Characterizing Small Molecule Kinase InhibitorsPoster
In order to profile compounds against a broad panel of kinases, in-house profiling requires rigorous kinase assay development.READ MORE
Assessment of Oral LISPRO Treatment in Ameliorating Amyloid and Tau Pathology in Transgenic Alzheimer’s Mice ModelPoster
Ionic co-crystals of lithium salicylate with organic proline (LISPRO) showed better safety and pharmacokinetic profile of lithium in plasma and brain of wild-type and transgenic Alzheimer mice model compared to lithium salts.READ MORE
CiPA Phase 2 Study: validation of an automated microelectrode array (MEA) assay of hiPSC-derived cardiomyocyte electrophysiology for cardiac safety evaluationPoster
These results support the use of hSC-CM and MEA technology for preclinical assessment of proarrhythmic risk within the proposed CiPA paradigm, and, more generally, demonstrate that automation of the CM-MEA assay can achieve high reliability and throughput for cardiac risk assessment in vitro.READ MORE
Comments | 0 ADD COMMENT
World Advanced Therapies & Regenerative Medicine Congress
May 16 - May 18, 2018